Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.contrariannews.org/p/the-trump-regimes-heinous-attack

The DOJ alleges that the SPLC’s use of informants was part of a “scheme and artifice” to deceive donors. Acting U.S. Attorney Kevin Davidson alleges in the indictment that though SPLC’s “stated mission included the dismantling of white supremacy and confronting hate across the country” it was “unbeknownst to donors,” secretly using “donated money … to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, and the National Alliance.”

However, the indictment utterly fails to explain how these payments to extremist leaders undercut the SPLC’s stated mission. Nor does it say how anyone working for the center intentionally deceived donors. Nor could it; if you surveyed donors to the organization, they have already stated or would almost undoubtedly say that investigating hate is exactly what they wanted to support and that these claims are reprehensible.

The DOJ’s entire case centers on the SPLC’s alleged payments to ten informants inside extremist groups. Our special report, which will be posted here at The Contrarian at noon today, details the facts regarding these informants. The report makes evident that not a one justifies the criminal charges brought against the SPLC.

I understand why people keep saying this, but this really is not the issue and it reflects a misunderstanding of the allegation. The SPLC isn't charged with using donor funds for an impermissible purpose. The allegation is that the SPLC failed to tell prospective donors that it used donor funds to pay extremist informants because it believed that disclosing this information would discourage donations. It is a subtle but important distinction.

There is no way of knowing that. Frankly, I have no issue with what they did to expose these bigots. The only people upset about it are the bigots.

This is just silly and makes you look ignorant.

Point to a donor who is upset about it.

I’m a donor and I’m upset about this. I didn’t donate for this, I think it’s profoundly wrong, and I’m unhappy.

I know you are in such a cult that you are going to claim I’m MAGA now because that’s the only way your world view functions, but I voted for, donated to, and supported Harris all the way.

I don't understand what you're upset about. I'm not even a donor but have been following SPLC and their work for years. They have been investigating and exposing extremist networks for decades. It's what they do. Paying informants for info is one of the tools in the toolbox. That is how many investigative organizations operate. How could anyone not understand that or be shocked by it?

The SPLC was giving money directly to the leadership of some of these groups, arranged transportation, and facilitated communication. It’s almost like they were propping them up.

You know these things or you were told to believe these things by a completely corrupt administration?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were paid informants, I understand the spin but are folks too dense to understand that. The press conference announcing the indictment made that abundantly clear.

Imagine believing that the KKK, Aryan Nations, Proud Boys and other supremacist groups have only ever existed because SPLC is funding them. Imagine believing that SPLC is paying thousands of people to get Nazi tattoos, join biker gangs, commit crimes, go to jail to organize white supremacist prison gangs. Imagine believing that one day someone is a pink haired gay vegan and the next they are Proud Boys members chasing down other pink haired gay vegans and beating them up for no reason other than an SPLC paycheck. Not to mention that SPLC's budget could barely make a dent in paying tens of thousands of people to pretend to be white supremacists.

The MAGA spin machine is truly delusional and is not grounded in any reality whatsoever.

Back to reiterate that the exposed chats from the Young Republicans group and just one single TPUSA chapter showed that racism runs deep in the Republican party.

In delusional MAGA land, those Young Republicans and TPUSA members are probably being rationalized as being undercover Antifa agents on SPLC's payroll. The right has completely lost its marbles.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were paid informants, I understand the spin but are folks too dense to understand that. The press conference announcing the indictment made that abundantly clear.

Imagine believing that the KKK, Aryan Nations, Proud Boys and other supremacist groups have only ever existed because SPLC is funding them. Imagine believing that SPLC is paying thousands of people to get Nazi tattoos, join biker gangs, commit crimes, go to jail to organize white supremacist prison gangs. Imagine believing that one day someone is a pink haired gay vegan and the next they are Proud Boys members chasing down other pink haired gay vegans and beating them up for no reason other than an SPLC paycheck. Not to mention that SPLC's budget could barely make a dent in paying tens of thousands of people to pretend to be white supremacists.

The MAGA spin machine is truly delusional and is not grounded in any reality whatsoever.

Back to reiterate that the exposed chats from the Young Republicans group and just one single TPUSA chapter showed that racism runs deep in the Republican party.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Everyone in DC knows the SPLC’s common playbook: Do the opposite to create the narrative, give it to your friends in the media who will look the other way and just amplify it. Tell the lie, create the craziness, and then raise a bunch of money, make a bunch of stink, and try to curate power.

How do you know any of this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They were paid informants, I understand the spin but are folks too dense to understand that. The press conference announcing the indictment made that abundantly clear.

Imagine believing that the KKK, Aryan Nations, Proud Boys and other supremacist groups have only ever existed because SPLC is funding them. Imagine believing that SPLC is paying thousands of people to get Nazi tattoos, join biker gangs, commit crimes, go to jail to organize white supremacist prison gangs. Imagine believing that one day someone is a pink haired gay vegan and the next they are Proud Boys members chasing down other pink haired gay vegans and beating them up for no reason other than an SPLC paycheck. Not to mention that SPLC's budget could barely make a dent in paying tens of thousands of people to pretend to be white supremacists.

The MAGA spin machine is truly delusional and is not grounded in any reality whatsoever.

Anonymous wrote:They were paid informants, I understand the spin but are folks too dense to understand that. The press conference announcing the indictment made that abundantly clear.

Anonymous wrote:Everyone in DC knows the SPLC’s common playbook: Do the opposite to create the narrative, give it to your friends in the media who will look the other way and just amplify it. Tell the lie, create the craziness, and then raise a bunch of money, make a bunch of stink, and try to curate power.

Anonymous wrote:Everyone in DC knows the SPLC’s common playbook: Do the opposite to create the narrative, give it to your friends in the media who will look the other way and just amplify it. Tell the lie, create the craziness, and then raise a bunch of money, make a bunch of stink, and try to curate power.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.contrariannews.org/p/the-trump-regimes-heinous-attack

The DOJ alleges that the SPLC’s use of informants was part of a “scheme and artifice” to deceive donors. Acting U.S. Attorney Kevin Davidson alleges in the indictment that though SPLC’s “stated mission included the dismantling of white supremacy and confronting hate across the country” it was “unbeknownst to donors,” secretly using “donated money … to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, and the National Alliance.”

However, the indictment utterly fails to explain how these payments to extremist leaders undercut the SPLC’s stated mission. Nor does it say how anyone working for the center intentionally deceived donors. Nor could it; if you surveyed donors to the organization, they have already stated or would almost undoubtedly say that investigating hate is exactly what they wanted to support and that these claims are reprehensible.

The DOJ’s entire case centers on the SPLC’s alleged payments to ten informants inside extremist groups. Our special report, which will be posted here at The Contrarian at noon today, details the facts regarding these informants. The report makes evident that not a one justifies the criminal charges brought against the SPLC.

I understand why people keep saying this, but this really is not the issue and it reflects a misunderstanding of the allegation. The SPLC isn't charged with using donor funds for an impermissible purpose. The allegation is that the SPLC failed to tell prospective donors that it used donor funds to pay extremist informants because it believed that disclosing this information would discourage donations. It is a subtle but important distinction.

There is no way of knowing that. Frankly, I have no issue with what they did to expose these bigots. The only people upset about it are the bigots.

This is just silly and makes you look ignorant.

Point to a donor who is upset about it.

I’m a donor and I’m upset about this. I didn’t donate for this, I think it’s profoundly wrong, and I’m unhappy.

I know you are in such a cult that you are going to claim I’m MAGA now because that’s the only way your world view functions, but I voted for, donated to, and supported Harris all the way.

I don't understand what you're upset about. I'm not even a donor but have been following SPLC and their work for years. They have been investigating and exposing extremist networks for decades. It's what they do. Paying informants for info is one of the tools in the toolbox. That is how many investigative organizations operate. How could anyone not understand that or be shocked by it?

The SPLC was giving money directly to the leadership of some of these groups, arranged transportation, and facilitated communication. It’s almost like they were propping them up.

You know these things or you were told to believe these things by a completely corrupt administration?

Pretty sure the SPLC has conceded that they were paying "informants."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.contrariannews.org/p/the-trump-regimes-heinous-attack

The DOJ alleges that the SPLC’s use of informants was part of a “scheme and artifice” to deceive donors. Acting U.S. Attorney Kevin Davidson alleges in the indictment that though SPLC’s “stated mission included the dismantling of white supremacy and confronting hate across the country” it was “unbeknownst to donors,” secretly using “donated money … to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, and the National Alliance.”

However, the indictment utterly fails to explain how these payments to extremist leaders undercut the SPLC’s stated mission. Nor does it say how anyone working for the center intentionally deceived donors. Nor could it; if you surveyed donors to the organization, they have already stated or would almost undoubtedly say that investigating hate is exactly what they wanted to support and that these claims are reprehensible.

The DOJ’s entire case centers on the SPLC’s alleged payments to ten informants inside extremist groups. Our special report, which will be posted here at The Contrarian at noon today, details the facts regarding these informants. The report makes evident that not a one justifies the criminal charges brought against the SPLC.

I understand why people keep saying this, but this really is not the issue and it reflects a misunderstanding of the allegation. The SPLC isn't charged with using donor funds for an impermissible purpose. The allegation is that the SPLC failed to tell prospective donors that it used donor funds to pay extremist informants because it believed that disclosing this information would discourage donations. It is a subtle but important distinction.

There is no way of knowing that. Frankly, I have no issue with what they did to expose these bigots. The only people upset about it are the bigots.

This is just silly and makes you look ignorant.

Point to a donor who is upset about it.

I’m a donor and I’m upset about this. I didn’t donate for this, I think it’s profoundly wrong, and I’m unhappy.

I know you are in such a cult that you are going to claim I’m MAGA now because that’s the only way your world view functions, but I voted for, donated to, and supported Harris all the way.

I don't understand what you're upset about. I'm not even a donor but have been following SPLC and their work for years. They have been investigating and exposing extremist networks for decades. It's what they do. Paying informants for info is one of the tools in the toolbox. That is how many investigative organizations operate. How could anyone not understand that or be shocked by it?

The SPLC was giving money directly to the leadership of some of these groups, arranged transportation, and facilitated communication. It’s almost like they were propping them up.

You know these things or you were told to believe these things by a completely corrupt administration?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.contrariannews.org/p/the-trump-regimes-heinous-attack

The DOJ alleges that the SPLC’s use of informants was part of a “scheme and artifice” to deceive donors. Acting U.S. Attorney Kevin Davidson alleges in the indictment that though SPLC’s “stated mission included the dismantling of white supremacy and confronting hate across the country” it was “unbeknownst to donors,” secretly using “donated money … to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, and the National Alliance.”

However, the indictment utterly fails to explain how these payments to extremist leaders undercut the SPLC’s stated mission. Nor does it say how anyone working for the center intentionally deceived donors. Nor could it; if you surveyed donors to the organization, they have already stated or would almost undoubtedly say that investigating hate is exactly what they wanted to support and that these claims are reprehensible.

The DOJ’s entire case centers on the SPLC’s alleged payments to ten informants inside extremist groups. Our special report, which will be posted here at The Contrarian at noon today, details the facts regarding these informants. The report makes evident that not a one justifies the criminal charges brought against the SPLC.

I understand why people keep saying this, but this really is not the issue and it reflects a misunderstanding of the allegation. The SPLC isn't charged with using donor funds for an impermissible purpose. The allegation is that the SPLC failed to tell prospective donors that it used donor funds to pay extremist informants because it believed that disclosing this information would discourage donations. It is a subtle but important distinction.

There is no way of knowing that. Frankly, I have no issue with what they did to expose these bigots. The only people upset about it are the bigots.

This is just silly and makes you look ignorant.

Point to a donor who is upset about it.

I’m a donor and I’m upset about this. I didn’t donate for this, I think it’s profoundly wrong, and I’m unhappy.

I know you are in such a cult that you are going to claim I’m MAGA now because that’s the only way your world view functions, but I voted for, donated to, and supported Harris all the way.

I don't understand what you're upset about. I'm not even a donor but have been following SPLC and their work for years. They have been investigating and exposing extremist networks for decades. It's what they do. Paying informants for info is one of the tools in the toolbox. That is how many investigative organizations operate. How could anyone not understand that or be shocked by it?

The SPLC was giving money directly to the leadership of some of these groups, arranged transportation, and facilitated communication. It’s almost like they were propping them up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.contrariannews.org/p/the-trump-regimes-heinous-attack

The DOJ alleges that the SPLC’s use of informants was part of a “scheme and artifice” to deceive donors. Acting U.S. Attorney Kevin Davidson alleges in the indictment that though SPLC’s “stated mission included the dismantling of white supremacy and confronting hate across the country” it was “unbeknownst to donors,” secretly using “donated money … to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, and the National Alliance.”

However, the indictment utterly fails to explain how these payments to extremist leaders undercut the SPLC’s stated mission. Nor does it say how anyone working for the center intentionally deceived donors. Nor could it; if you surveyed donors to the organization, they have already stated or would almost undoubtedly say that investigating hate is exactly what they wanted to support and that these claims are reprehensible.

The DOJ’s entire case centers on the SPLC’s alleged payments to ten informants inside extremist groups. Our special report, which will be posted here at The Contrarian at noon today, details the facts regarding these informants. The report makes evident that not a one justifies the criminal charges brought against the SPLC.

I understand why people keep saying this, but this really is not the issue and it reflects a misunderstanding of the allegation. The SPLC isn't charged with using donor funds for an impermissible purpose. The allegation is that the SPLC failed to tell prospective donors that it used donor funds to pay extremist informants because it believed that disclosing this information would discourage donations. It is a subtle but important distinction.

There is no way of knowing that. Frankly, I have no issue with what they did to expose these bigots. The only people upset about it are the bigots.

This is just silly and makes you look ignorant.

Point to a donor who is upset about it.

I’m a donor and I’m upset about this. I didn’t donate for this, I think it’s profoundly wrong, and I’m unhappy.

I know you are in such a cult that you are going to claim I’m MAGA now because that’s the only way your world view functions, but I voted for, donated to, and supported Harris all the way.

I don't understand what you're upset about. I'm not even a donor but have been following SPLC and their work for years. They have been investigating and exposing extremist networks for decades. It's what they do. Paying informants for info is one of the tools in the toolbox. That is how many investigative organizations operate. How could anyone not understand that or be shocked by it?

The SPLC was giving money directly to the leadership of some of these groups, arranged transportation, and facilitated communication. It’s almost like they were propping them up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.contrariannews.org/p/the-trump-regimes-heinous-attack

The DOJ alleges that the SPLC’s use of informants was part of a “scheme and artifice” to deceive donors. Acting U.S. Attorney Kevin Davidson alleges in the indictment that though SPLC’s “stated mission included the dismantling of white supremacy and confronting hate across the country” it was “unbeknownst to donors,” secretly using “donated money … to fund the leaders and organizers of racist groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryan Nation, and the National Alliance.”

However, the indictment utterly fails to explain how these payments to extremist leaders undercut the SPLC’s stated mission. Nor does it say how anyone working for the center intentionally deceived donors. Nor could it; if you surveyed donors to the organization, they have already stated or would almost undoubtedly say that investigating hate is exactly what they wanted to support and that these claims are reprehensible.

The DOJ’s entire case centers on the SPLC’s alleged payments to ten informants inside extremist groups. Our special report, which will be posted here at The Contrarian at noon today, details the facts regarding these informants. The report makes evident that not a one justifies the criminal charges brought against the SPLC.

I understand why people keep saying this, but this really is not the issue and it reflects a misunderstanding of the allegation. The SPLC isn't charged with using donor funds for an impermissible purpose. The allegation is that the SPLC failed to tell prospective donors that it used donor funds to pay extremist informants because it believed that disclosing this information would discourage donations. It is a subtle but important distinction.

There is no way of knowing that. Frankly, I have no issue with what they did to expose these bigots. The only people upset about it are the bigots.

This is just silly and makes you look ignorant.

Point to a donor who is upset about it.

I’m a donor and I’m upset about this. I didn’t donate for this, I think it’s profoundly wrong, and I’m unhappy.

I know you are in such a cult that you are going to claim I’m MAGA now because that’s the only way your world view functions, but I voted for, donated to, and supported Harris all the way.

I don't understand what you're upset about. I'm not even a donor but have been following SPLC and their work for years. They have been investigating and exposing extremist networks for decades. It's what they do. Paying informants for info is one of the tools in the toolbox. That is how many investigative organizations operate. How could anyone not understand that or be shocked by it?