Anonymous wrote:Vote Yes to stop Trump from rigging the midterms!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cardinal News explanation of how geographic boundaries, e.g. mountains, influenced historical and current district boundaries and what the proposed districts do wrt geography and communities of interest.
Go ahead and vote yes but fully understand your decision.
https://cardinalnews.org/2026/03/20/current-congressional-map-follows-mountains-the-proposed-one-doesnt-should-that-matter/
LOL, the MAGAs are really getting desperate. I couldn't care less if the Blue Ridge Mountains used to be the basis for drawing districts. That was a totally artificial decision, and now we'll make a totally different artificial decision. Let's stop pretending that there's some sacrosanct way that this must be done.
This is exactly why Republicans redrew the maps. Districting is a totally artificial decision.
Trump was very clear that they redrew the maps in TX to pick up 5 more Republican seats.
Anonymous wrote:Saw a good sign on the median right near Rt 50
"Vote NO Don't Divide Arlington"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Saw a good sign on the median right near Rt 50
"Vote NO Don't Divide Arlington"
MAGA scum trying to protect Trump.
Tell me you don't know how Leg Branch works...
Also tell me you are in S Arlington/Alexandria.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Saw a good sign on the median right near Rt 50
"Vote NO Don't Divide Arlington"
MAGA scum trying to protect Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Saw a good sign on the median right near Rt 50
"Vote NO Don't Divide Arlington"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cardinal News explanation of how geographic boundaries, e.g. mountains, influenced historical and current district boundaries and what the proposed districts do wrt geography and communities of interest.
Go ahead and vote yes but fully understand your decision.
https://cardinalnews.org/2026/03/20/current-congressional-map-follows-mountains-the-proposed-one-doesnt-should-that-matter/
LOL, the MAGAs are really getting desperate. I couldn't care less if the Blue Ridge Mountains used to be the basis for drawing districts. That was a totally artificial decision, and now we'll make a totally different artificial decision. Let's stop pretending that there's some sacrosanct way that this must be done.
This is exactly why Republicans redrew the maps. Districting is a totally artificial decision.
Trump was very clear that they redrew the maps in TX to pick up 5 more Republican seats.
What's your point? Districts are arbitrary. You can draw them any way you want for any reason.
The point is that t redistricting was purposeful. Their stated goal was to gain 5 Republican seats, and they drew the lines to achieve that goal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cardinal News explanation of how geographic boundaries, e.g. mountains, influenced historical and current district boundaries and what the proposed districts do wrt geography and communities of interest.
Go ahead and vote yes but fully understand your decision.
https://cardinalnews.org/2026/03/20/current-congressional-map-follows-mountains-the-proposed-one-doesnt-should-that-matter/
LOL, the MAGAs are really getting desperate. I couldn't care less if the Blue Ridge Mountains used to be the basis for drawing districts. That was a totally artificial decision, and now we'll make a totally different artificial decision. Let's stop pretending that there's some sacrosanct way that this must be done.
This is exactly why Republicans redrew the maps. Districting is a totally artificial decision.
Trump was very clear that they redrew the maps in TX to pick up 5 more Republican seats.
What's your point? Districts are arbitrary. You can draw them any way you want for any reason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cardinal News explanation of how geographic boundaries, e.g. mountains, influenced historical and current district boundaries and what the proposed districts do wrt geography and communities of interest.
Go ahead and vote yes but fully understand your decision.
https://cardinalnews.org/2026/03/20/current-congressional-map-follows-mountains-the-proposed-one-doesnt-should-that-matter/
LOL, the MAGAs are really getting desperate. I couldn't care less if the Blue Ridge Mountains used to be the basis for drawing districts. That was a totally artificial decision, and now we'll make a totally different artificial decision. Let's stop pretending that there's some sacrosanct way that this must be done.
This is exactly why Republicans redrew the maps. Districting is a totally artificial decision.
Trump was very clear that they redrew the maps in TX to pick up 5 more Republican seats.