Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Shhhhh!! It’s secret. It’s sensitive. Don’t post anything about a publicly known arbitration. Shhhhh!
What a bunch of dorks.
It’s not secret dumb*ss. It was sent to all union members and if you had any shred of social skills you would just ask a colleague to send it to you. Or, you know, join the freakin’ union like normal people do.
Here’s my take on this whole thing. The reason it is all quiet about the decision is that there will be some sort of a resolution to this. A settlement. Where we will get 2 days per pay period.
This is my prayer and the only reason I have stuck around this long. Realistically, I think there will be a mass exodus when PA digs in and appeals.
100% on an exodus if there isn’t some resolution resulting in regular telework . I think people need 2 days to stay. With only one I think the retirement eligible people leave. I don’t know if they realize how many people are waiting to see if anything shakes out of the Division Directors asking and the Union win and will leave if we stay at 5 days per week.
So PA would defy the EO and opm just bc the division directors “asked” or bc some rando powerless arbitrator said so? Not gonna happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Shhhhh!! It’s secret. It’s sensitive. Don’t post anything about a publicly known arbitration. Shhhhh!
What a bunch of dorks.
It’s not secret dumb*ss. It was sent to all union members and if you had any shred of social skills you would just ask a colleague to send it to you. Or, you know, join the freakin’ union like normal people do.
Here’s my take on this whole thing. The reason it is all quiet about the decision is that there will be some sort of a resolution to this. A settlement. Where we will get 2 days per pay period.
This is my prayer and the only reason I have stuck around this long. Realistically, I think there will be a mass exodus when PA digs in and appeals.
100% on an exodus if there isn’t some resolution resulting in regular telework . I think people need 2 days to stay. With only one I think the retirement eligible people leave. I don’t know if they realize how many people are waiting to see if anything shakes out of the Division Directors asking and the Union win and will leave if we stay at 5 days per week.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Shhhhh!! It’s secret. It’s sensitive. Don’t post anything about a publicly known arbitration. Shhhhh!
What a bunch of dorks.
It’s not secret dumb*ss. It was sent to all union members and if you had any shred of social skills you would just ask a colleague to send it to you. Or, you know, join the freakin’ union like normal people do.
Here’s my take on this whole thing. The reason it is all quiet about the decision is that there will be some sort of a resolution to this. A settlement. Where we will get 2 days per pay period.
This is my prayer and the only reason I have stuck around this long. Realistically, I think there will be a mass exodus when PA digs in and appeals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Shhhhh!! It’s secret. It’s sensitive. Don’t post anything about a publicly known arbitration. Shhhhh!
What a bunch of dorks.
It’s not secret dumb*ss. It was sent to all union members and if you had any shred of social skills you would just ask a colleague to send it to you. Or, you know, join the freakin’ union like normal people do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Shhhhh!! It’s secret. It’s sensitive. Don’t post anything about a publicly known arbitration. Shhhhh!
What a bunch of dorks.
It’s not secret dumb*ss. It was sent to all union members and if you had any shred of social skills you would just ask a colleague to send it to you. Or, you know, join the freakin’ union like normal people do.
Here’s my take on this whole thing. The reason it is all quiet about the decision is that there will be some sort of a resolution to this. A settlement. Where we will get 2 days per pay period.
This is my prayer and the only reason I have stuck around this long. Realistically, I think there will be a mass exodus when PA digs in and appeals.
oh, they will appeal. also don't forget they are going to try to make everyone schedule f. i predict a lot of quiet quitting, but probably not so much actual quitting unless another fork comes along.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Shhhhh!! It’s secret. It’s sensitive. Don’t post anything about a publicly known arbitration. Shhhhh!
What a bunch of dorks.
It’s not secret dumb*ss. It was sent to all union members and if you had any shred of social skills you would just ask a colleague to send it to you. Or, you know, join the freakin’ union like normal people do.
Here’s my take on this whole thing. The reason it is all quiet about the decision is that there will be some sort of a resolution to this. A settlement. Where we will get 2 days per pay period.
This is my prayer and the only reason I have stuck around this long. Realistically, I think there will be a mass exodus when PA digs in and appeals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Shhhhh!! It’s secret. It’s sensitive. Don’t post anything about a publicly known arbitration. Shhhhh!
What a bunch of dorks.
It’s not secret dumb*ss. It was sent to all union members and if you had any shred of social skills you would just ask a colleague to send it to you. Or, you know, join the freakin’ union like normal people do.
Here’s my take on this whole thing. The reason it is all quiet about the decision is that there will be some sort of a resolution to this. A settlement. Where we will get 2 days per pay period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Shhhhh!! It’s secret. It’s sensitive. Don’t post anything about a publicly known arbitration. Shhhhh!
What a bunch of dorks.
It’s not secret dumb*ss. It was sent to all union members and if you had any shred of social skills you would just ask a colleague to send it to you. Or, you know, join the freakin’ union like normal people do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Shhhhh!! It’s secret. It’s sensitive. Don’t post anything about a publicly known arbitration. Shhhhh!
What a bunch of dorks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
It has been circulated within the SEC. And besides the majority of SEC staff are union members. The ones that aren’t obtained the decision one way or the other. The fact that you had to go on the dark web is pretty pathetic.
It was sarcasm. The fact that staff have to individually “obtain” an arbitration opinion is what’s “pathetic.”
The union wouldn’t STFU about the issue for a year, but when the decision finally comes out, it doesn’t even mention it publicly? Shady as hell.
Give it up!!!
Anonymous wrote:Never mind. Found it in the dark web. So secretive!
(It obviously has not been circulated as much as posters say, else Reuters would have published it long ago, like they do everything else.).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's today's meeting about, any guesses??
What meeting?
If you have to pask, you’re probably on the list.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's today's meeting about, any guesses??
What meeting?
Anonymous wrote:What's today's meeting about, any guesses??