Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It might have set a record for how quickly it drove the main cast underground.
As the actor who played Scott said, they didn't anticipate the mass psychosis event and he logged off all social media to get away from the cesspool.
The two leads have resurfaced for the Olympic torch thing after a week or more of disappearing - probably will disappear again for the sake of their safety and sanity.
Has to be frustrating for them that so few are interested in your actual work and your artistry and instead go overboard in reading into and becoming emotionally invested to the point of insanity in what was meant to be a fun series. I am sure they wish they could just talk about how it was fun to film and how they developed their characters etc. That is what the media was about in the early days.
Now it is just people screaming, clawing at them, sobbing, vomiting, wanting to murder their families, watching it repeatedly / obsessively, thinking every movement is sending some kind of deep message to the fans, fantasizing, and overidentifying with the characters / storyline.
but the leads presented an award at the golden globes last week
Anonymous wrote:It might have set a record for how quickly it drove the main cast underground.
As the actor who played Scott said, they didn't anticipate the mass psychosis event and he logged off all social media to get away from the cesspool.
The two leads have resurfaced for the Olympic torch thing after a week or more of disappearing - probably will disappear again for the sake of their safety and sanity.
Has to be frustrating for them that so few are interested in your actual work and your artistry and instead go overboard in reading into and becoming emotionally invested to the point of insanity in what was meant to be a fun series. I am sure they wish they could just talk about how it was fun to film and how they developed their characters etc. That is what the media was about in the early days.
Now it is just people screaming, clawing at them, sobbing, vomiting, wanting to murder their families, watching it repeatedly / obsessively, thinking every movement is sending some kind of deep message to the fans, fantasizing, and overidentifying with the characters / storyline.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just chuckling at all the Vanilla crowd saying it's just smut. Um, maybe tune out from Bridgerton. Or are we only offended when the leads are gay?
FWIW, I think this and Bridgerton are exactly the same - a smutty romance targeted at a largely female audience with no deep meaning behind it despite trying to throw in a little for respectability (racial stuff for Bridgerton, homophobia issues for HR.)
Neither is much my thing but there is nothing wrong with them. But all the “it is so deep it might as well be the second coming of Shakespeare!” posts here and elsewhere crack me up. It’s not. You don’t need to justify with how intellectual and meaningful and this and that it is to allow yourself to enjoy it. It’s OK to like a trashy, romancy bit of fun and admit this is what that is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just chuckling at all the Vanilla crowd saying it's just smut. Um, maybe tune out from Bridgerton. Or are we only offended when the leads are gay?
FWIW, I think this and Bridgerton are exactly the same - a smutty romance targeted at a largely female audience with no deep meaning behind it despite trying to throw in a little for respectability (racial stuff for Bridgerton, homophobia issues for HR.)
Neither is much my thing but there is nothing wrong with them. But all the “it is so deep it might as well be the second coming of Shakespeare!” posts here and elsewhere crack me up. It’s not. You don’t need to justify with how intellectual and meaningful and this and that it is to allow yourself to enjoy it. It’s OK to like a trashy, romancy bit of fun and admit this is what that is.
To me, the books read like that, but not the show. It feels deeper and makes audiences emotionally invested because of the incredible acting and all the little details that were changed and added in the TV adaptation.
One of the characters struggles with a language barrier and the other is on the spectrum, so verbal communication is not their forte, but the viewer is able to discern their feelings of love, longing, worry, frustration, hope, hurt etc. because of how well the actors portray them with their micro expressions, body language, and choice of specific words and inflection in he dialogue. I forget that I am watching TV; it feels like I am intruding on someone’s private relationship.
Add to that the really hot sex scenes and fresh beautiful faces (and bodies, lol), and you get a global streaming phenomenon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just chuckling at all the Vanilla crowd saying it's just smut. Um, maybe tune out from Bridgerton. Or are we only offended when the leads are gay?
FWIW, I think this and Bridgerton are exactly the same - a smutty romance targeted at a largely female audience with no deep meaning behind it despite trying to throw in a little for respectability (racial stuff for Bridgerton, homophobia issues for HR.)
Neither is much my thing but there is nothing wrong with them. But all the “it is so deep it might as well be the second coming of Shakespeare!” posts here and elsewhere crack me up. It’s not. You don’t need to justify with how intellectual and meaningful and this and that it is to allow yourself to enjoy it. It’s OK to like a trashy, romancy bit of fun and admit this is what that is.
Anonymous wrote:I am just chuckling at all the Vanilla crowd saying it's just smut. Um, maybe tune out from Bridgerton. Or are we only offended when the leads are gay?
Anonymous wrote:I am just chuckling at all the Vanilla crowd saying it's just smut. Um, maybe tune out from Bridgerton. Or are we only offended when the leads are gay?
Anonymous wrote:Episode 5 is among the best TV episodes of all time. For me, it's up there with The Red Wedding in GoT, The Hope That Kills You in Ted Lasso, Ozymandias in Breaking Bad, The Constant in Lost and a couple of episodes in The Last Of Us. It had joy, pain, grief, hope and a big ILY sprinkled on top. I was feeling all the feels!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I appreciate that it is a very low budget show, but the creators clearly put a lot of effort into doing a good job. It’s also great that they gave opportunities to lesser known actors. The actor that plays the Russian is fantastic. He isn’t even Russian he is from Texas.
Yes, all of this. The acting is quite good, especially the actor who plays Ilya. I was very surprised that he isn't Russian or Russian speaking. A lot of the show is also beautifully shot and has really good music. I was not expecting to like it so much.
+1. Connor Storrie's acting is incredible, he carries that show. I was shocked to find out that he is from Texas. His Russian is excellent (my mother is Russian, and I am fluent).
He is so hot too.
Agree. But Hudson Williams was also outstanding, just more subtle. They don’t state it in the show, but in the books, Shane is mildly autistic and Hudson played the character with that in mind. It’s a really strong performance.
Fair point. Both leads are excellent actors.
I haven’t enjoyed an indie show like this in years.
The physical acting in this series is phenomenal. The way Connor can convey so much emotion with just one look. Hudson too. Man..I want the best for these talented young actors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I appreciate that it is a very low budget show, but the creators clearly put a lot of effort into doing a good job. It’s also great that they gave opportunities to lesser known actors. The actor that plays the Russian is fantastic. He isn’t even Russian he is from Texas.
Yes, all of this. The acting is quite good, especially the actor who plays Ilya. I was very surprised that he isn't Russian or Russian speaking. A lot of the show is also beautifully shot and has really good music. I was not expecting to like it so much.
+1. Connor Storrie's acting is incredible, he carries that show. I was shocked to find out that he is from Texas. His Russian is excellent (my mother is Russian, and I am fluent).
He is so hot too.
Agree. But Hudson Williams was also outstanding, just more subtle. They don’t state it in the show, but in the books, Shane is mildly autistic and Hudson played the character with that in mind. It’s a really strong performance.
Fair point. Both leads are excellent actors.
I haven’t enjoyed an indie show like this in years.
The physical acting in this series is phenomenal. The way Connor can convey so much emotion with just one look. Hudson too. Man..I want the best for these talented young actors.
+1. They fell in love early on, but neither believed the other could possibly feel the same, plus the stigma of being gay in the NHL, so they wouldn’t admit it out loud for almost 10 years. But boy did those longing, love drunk eyes tell the story!