Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope those opposed to this plan will testify against it and write in to the BOE. We have until March, when the BOE will vote on it, per the updated timeline at the last Board meeting:
https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DMJHXR4AA9BD/$file/Boundary%20Studies%20Program%20Analysis%20Update%20251016%20PPT%20REV.pdf
This is a done deal. They don't care about testimony which is why they barely acknowledge it.
Well, I for one plan to at least try. I hope others will as well.
Anonymous wrote:The current class of 7th graders that may be the first group to go through the new process have really gotten the short end of the stick at mcps if they've been around since KG.
1. They had the horrible benchmark curriculum and can barely spell.
2. Didn't start Eureka math till 1st grade - the second half of which went down the hole because of COVID
3. For those that qualified, got zero enrichment bc of COVID in 2nd and 3rd grade.
4. For those that needed it, county wide ELC was rolled out when they were in 5th grade so they missed another chance for enrichment in 4th of their school didn't have ELC (many did not! And those that did had inequitable implementation).
5. Now they'll be guinea pigs for a bunch of random programs that the county is slapping together like a cheese sandwich in the cafeteria.
Good luck class of 2031.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think pushback and pressure on this proposal is mounting. Right now, MCPS and the board are standing firm in shoving it down the public's throats. Not sure if that will get them across the finish line. We'll have to see how things play out over the next few months.
You see MCPS is a large organization and there are many schools that are you know 1 and 2 stars mostly nominally 3 star in MCPS. You'll see some of the vocal ones on here, but in general most people are all for busting up the poo poo elite squad who are seen as taking advantage of the system and throwing us lottery crumbs.
The proposed plan is nothing but crumbs packaged to sound that people are getting something. No new teachers; no new resources; just bunch of programs that are either watered down and not much of an improvement over existing class offerings or some highly specialized programs that meet interests of very few.
Of, course not do you think they were going to share their eliteness with us? When everyone gets a good education, your poo poo won't smell as bad.
Some don't want your kids to get a good education - less competition.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I hope those opposed to this plan will testify against it and write in to the BOE. We have until March, when the BOE will vote on it, per the updated timeline at the last Board meeting:
https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DMJHXR4AA9BD/$file/Boundary%20Studies%20Program%20Analysis%20Update%20251016%20PPT%20REV.pdf
This is a done deal. They don't care about testimony which is why they barely acknowledge it.