Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Common sense says if admit rates are under 20% it's a damn tough admit.
Yes and no. Many parents are not aware of or haven't fully internalized the rampant grade and standardized test score inflation that has occurred since they applied to college. It's easy to make the mistake of thinking, "Wow, that's a low admissions percentage. But my kid's GPA and SAT score are at or above the school's 75th percentile, so I think my kid still has a really good shot of getting in. My kid is still way more qualified than the vast majority of the applicant pool. Their scores are much higher than mine, and I got into multiple top-ranked schools."
When parents applied to college, their chances of getting into a highly selective school with grades and scores well above the median were, indeed, very high. But with grade/score inflation (such that there are way more super-high stats students than spots at top 25 schools), combined with schools placing greater emphasis on other factors in admissions, everything has changed now.
I think many people from our generation don't fully come to terms with those changes until they see the results.
Anonymous wrote:
Common sense says if admit rates are under 20% it's a damn tough admit.
Anonymous wrote:Georgetown doesn’t have big time football and their basketball program hasn’t been good for decades. They seem to downplay their Catholic identity. Just can’t see kids applying to ND and Georgetown so vastly different cultures.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sad to hear about all the seniors turning down Georgetown for Notre Dame.
When I went to Georgetown in the 1990s, Notre Dame was not even a close follower for 'best Catholic'. Now ND is a solid top 20 and spends all that football money, and all those Georgetown alums dedicated to public service have been DOGEd.
My kid really wanted to go to Georgetown, but once its campus was compared to places like ND, BC, Michigan, Wake, & Northwestern, it lost much of its appeal.
But Georgetown’s location in DC is so much more appealing than Notre Dame (rural, boring town), BC (suburbs), Wake (boring and isolated). Northwestern (pretty but so far from downtown Chicago). I will give you Michigan, hard to beat A2.
Anonymous wrote:^Agree and Georgetown campus is tiny with no land to grow. ND and Georgetown have very different vibes tough to replicate home football weekends at Notre Dame. Holy Cross has their niche as only Catholic LAC and very prominent alumni body. Amazed that Georgetown as oldest Catholic school has such a modest endowment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our eldest is the oldest kid in our friend group and the eldest in our extended family.
I feel like I'm a PSA "it's not the same as it was 30 years ago!" On repeat.
No parent really "gets" it until the rejections start coming in.
Agree with this, have to have one kid go through cycle before one can truly understand how different it is.
Anonymous wrote:Disagree ND was always the top Catholic school followed by Gtown and Holy Cross. Would say they still are and in same order. Major difference now is ND has a $20 billion endowment whereas Georgetown in the $3-4 billion and much smaller Holy Cross < $1.5 billion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm sad to hear about all the seniors turning down Georgetown for Notre Dame.
When I went to Georgetown in the 1990s, Notre Dame was not even a close follower for 'best Catholic'. Now ND is a solid top 20 and spends all that football money, and all those Georgetown alums dedicated to public service have been DOGEd.
My kid really wanted to go to Georgetown, but once its campus was compared to places like ND, BC, Michigan, Wake, & Northwestern, it lost much of its appeal.
But Georgetown’s location in DC is so much more appealing than Notre Dame (rural, boring town), BC (suburbs), Wake (boring and isolated). Northwestern (pretty but so far from downtown Chicago). I will give you Michigan, hard to beat A2.