Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

The kids didn’t go to their gma’s party. Jolie hosted the GMA and nieces at her house another day. One of the nieces commented on this

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

+ 1 million! Seriously, how dumb do some of these posters think we are to believe that a man with his money and inflience couldn't see his kids, go to their performances, etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

So on the one hand you have those saying the kids side with their mom, don’t like their father, Thank God they’re away from the drunk abuser. Then you have posts like this saying why isn’t he showing up to things like baby girl’s play (produced by the mother he does not get along with) after said baby girl omitted his last name in the playbill. You have Zahara obviously devoted to her mom as they hold hands every time they’re in public together. Why would she ever welcome him in Atlanta? Is he supposed to barge in and make a scene uninvited?

If the twins do actually see him, and I hope they do, but doubtful, why can’t they visit him on set where he’s contractually obligated to be? Baby girl spent a whole semester in NY (approved by her father) for her play.They can’t visit with a nanny or tutor to see him for a few days or a week? They all follow AJ around the world but don’t ever see him, nor any of their grandparents it seems. They don’t do these things because they don’t want to. All they need is Mom.

I’m guessing he tried to reunify I think they call it, going through therapy with them and supervised visits until they were old enough to have a say about where and with whom they wanted to spend their time. If they are still afraid of him, hate him on their mom’s behalf, angry with him-obviously seeing they're removing his name one by one, because they still see themselves as his victims, what should he do? Force his way in or step back and respect their wishes which seem clear. It’s a horrible situation from all sides no matter how you look at it.

This seems right. The Broadway show was Angelina's thing, he wasn't going to horn in. Especially after his daughter made a point of dropping his surname for the program. What would have been gained?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

So on the one hand you have those saying the kids side with their mom, don’t like their father, Thank God they’re away from the drunk abuser. Then you have posts like this saying why isn’t he showing up to things like baby girl’s play (produced by the mother he does not get along with) after said baby girl omitted his last name in the playbill. You have Zahara obviously devoted to her mom as they hold hands every time they’re in public together. Why would she ever welcome him in Atlanta? Is he supposed to barge in and make a scene uninvited?

If the twins do actually see him, and I hope they do, but doubtful, why can’t they visit him on set where he’s contractually obligated to be? Baby girl spent a whole semester in NY (approved by her father) for her play.They can’t visit with a nanny or tutor to see him for a few days or a week? They all follow AJ around the world but don’t ever see him, nor any of their grandparents it seems. They don’t do these things because they don’t want to. All they need is Mom.

I’m guessing he tried to reunify I think they call it, going through therapy with them and supervised visits until they were old enough to have a say about where and with whom they wanted to spend their time. If they are still afraid of him, hate him on their mom’s behalf, angry with him-obviously seeing they're removing his name one by one, because they still see themselves as his victims, what should he do? Force his way in or step back and respect their wishes which seem clear. It’s a horrible situation from all sides no matter how you look at it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

So on the one hand you have those saying the kids side with their mom, don’t like their father, Thank God they’re away from the drunk abuser. Then you have posts like this saying why isn’t he showing up to things like baby girl’s play (produced by the mother he does not get along with) after said baby girl omitted his last name in the playbill. You have Zahara obviously devoted to her mom as they hold hands every time they’re in public together. Why would she ever welcome him in Atlanta? Is he supposed to barge in and make a scene uninvited?

If the twins do actually see him, and I hope they do, but doubtful, why can’t they visit him on set where he’s contractually obligated to be? Baby girl spent a whole semester in NY (approved by her father) for her play.They can’t visit with a nanny or tutor to see him for a few days or a week? They all follow AJ around the world but don’t ever see him, nor any of their grandparents it seems. They don’t do these things because they don’t want to. All they need is Mom.

I’m guessing he tried to reunify I think they call it, going through therapy with them and supervised visits until they were old enough to have a say about where and with whom they wanted to spend their time. If they are still afraid of him, hate him on their mom’s behalf, angry with him-obviously seeing they're removing his name one by one, because they still see themselves as his victims, what should he do? Force his way in or step back and respect their wishes which seem clear. It’s a horrible situation from all sides no matter how you look at it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

Anonymous wrote:

He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show.

That's Angelina's production, who are we kidding And that happened in 2024; after all the damage was already done.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

"Keeping his children away" you sound delusional. How is this not a pr bot when you're just copying his words?

He tried to gain 50/50 custody of the children. She fought him in court to deny him any custody of the kids. Even after he win 50/50 custody, she got the private judge in the case disqualified. She’s a horrible mother who purposely destroyed her children’s relationships with their father.

She asked for the judge to be disqualified before the trial ever started. The verdict from the judges lay the timeline out. He never asked for more custody because he wouldn't be favored anymore.