Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:75/25 is a hard nut to crack.
Times may be changing but do you want your daughter at the front end with the 25 or the 75? Honest question.
99% on this board bet with the 75 when the time comes.
Look, if your kid's got the talent, they'll get seen in ECNL or GA. All the big colleges were at the last GA showcase, too. You can be in ECNL and still not get recruited if they're not putting in the work. Don't let the ECNL coaches on here sway you too much. And hey, don't forget, both the current National Female College player of the year winner and the US Soccer Young Female Player of the Year came from GA.
Anonymous wrote:75/25 is a hard nut to crack.
Times may be changing but do you want your daughter at the front end with the 25 or the 75? Honest question.
99% on this board bet with the 75 when the time comes.
Anonymous wrote:75/25 is a hard nut to crack.
Times may be changing but do you want your daughter at the front end with the 25 or the 75? Honest question.
99% on this board bet with the 75 when the time comes.
Anonymous wrote:75/25 is a hard nut to crack.
Times may be changing but do you want your daughter at the front end with the 25 or the 75? Honest question.
99% on this board bet with the 75 when the time comes.
Anonymous wrote:Hmmmm….How did the whole DA experiment (jumping into the DA boys bandwagon) work out for these big girls clubs before? Oh that’s right- it folded and clubs were left scrambling to try to get back into ECNL. Some never made it back in. Those that were lucky and did and those who watched it all unfold won’t forget so quickly how an unproven test on the girls side can come crumbling down.No big club is jumping into this…
Can you clarify how someone would embarrass themselves in a forum where responses are anonymous.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're sock puppeting your own invented narrative of a butterfly effect.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3-4 out of 150ish wouldn't move the needle. Would need 10-12 net loss to make a dent. Was last year a net loss or gain for ECNL?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Listen- it’s going to take a loooong time before the ratio of college recruits moves anywhere away from ECNL —which is sitting pretty at 77%
No parent is going to agree to jump on some bandwagon to help GA launch a takeover if it means their own daughter is in a worse exposure position for college. It’s all fun and games until your kid is the guinea pig on some long term experiments And this is exactly what will happen for every parent who has a U-8 daughter now.
It will take 8-10 years for GA to move from <30% to 77%.
Most parents on these boards don’t have that kind of time.
So I guess it’s up to the U-6 parents to drive this change forward.
Parents will take their girls out of c
All it will take is 3-4 big ECNL clubs switching from ECNL to GA and it will be over.
It all depends on who switches over.
If SD Surf changed from ECNL to GA most clubs would follow.
BTW MLS is already working on SD Surf boys.
https://www.sandiegofc.com/news/news-san-diego-fc-partners-with-san-diego-surf-soccer-club-to-help-grow-the-beautiful-game-in-san-diego-county
But don't let this get in the way of your narrative.
Stop embarrassing yourself
Anonymous wrote:You're sock puppeting your own invented narrative of a butterfly effect.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3-4 out of 150ish wouldn't move the needle. Would need 10-12 net loss to make a dent. Was last year a net loss or gain for ECNL?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Listen- it’s going to take a loooong time before the ratio of college recruits moves anywhere away from ECNL —which is sitting pretty at 77%
No parent is going to agree to jump on some bandwagon to help GA launch a takeover if it means their own daughter is in a worse exposure position for college. It’s all fun and games until your kid is the guinea pig on some long term experiments And this is exactly what will happen for every parent who has a U-8 daughter now.
It will take 8-10 years for GA to move from <30% to 77%.
Most parents on these boards don’t have that kind of time.
So I guess it’s up to the U-6 parents to drive this change forward.
Parents will take their girls out of c
All it will take is 3-4 big ECNL clubs switching from ECNL to GA and it will be over.
It all depends on who switches over.
If SD Surf changed from ECNL to GA most clubs would follow.
BTW MLS is already working on SD Surf boys.
https://www.sandiegofc.com/news/news-san-diego-fc-partners-with-san-diego-surf-soccer-club-to-help-grow-the-beautiful-game-in-san-diego-county
But don't let this get in the way of your narrative.
You're sock puppeting your own invented narrative of a butterfly effect.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3-4 out of 150ish wouldn't move the needle. Would need 10-12 net loss to make a dent. Was last year a net loss or gain for ECNL?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Listen- it’s going to take a loooong time before the ratio of college recruits moves anywhere away from ECNL —which is sitting pretty at 77%
No parent is going to agree to jump on some bandwagon to help GA launch a takeover if it means their own daughter is in a worse exposure position for college. It’s all fun and games until your kid is the guinea pig on some long term experiments And this is exactly what will happen for every parent who has a U-8 daughter now.
It will take 8-10 years for GA to move from <30% to 77%.
Most parents on these boards don’t have that kind of time.
So I guess it’s up to the U-6 parents to drive this change forward.
Parents will take their girls out of c
All it will take is 3-4 big ECNL clubs switching from ECNL to GA and it will be over.
It all depends on who switches over.
If SD Surf changed from ECNL to GA most clubs would follow.
BTW MLS is already working on SD Surf boys.
https://www.sandiegofc.com/news/news-san-diego-fc-partners-with-san-diego-surf-soccer-club-to-help-grow-the-beautiful-game-in-san-diego-county
But don't let this get in the way of your narrative.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:3-4 out of 150ish wouldn't move the needle. Would need 10-12 net loss to make a dent. Was last year a net loss or gain for ECNL?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Listen- it’s going to take a loooong time before the ratio of college recruits moves anywhere away from ECNL —which is sitting pretty at 77%
No parent is going to agree to jump on some bandwagon to help GA launch a takeover if it means their own daughter is in a worse exposure position for college. It’s all fun and games until your kid is the guinea pig on some long term experiments And this is exactly what will happen for every parent who has a U-8 daughter now.
It will take 8-10 years for GA to move from <30% to 77%.
Most parents on these boards don’t have that kind of time.
So I guess it’s up to the U-6 parents to drive this change forward.
Parents will take their girls out of c
All it will take is 3-4 big ECNL clubs switching from ECNL to GA and it will be over.
It all depends on who switches over.
If SD Surf changed from ECNL to GA most clubs would follow.
Anonymous wrote:3-4 out of 150ish wouldn't move the needle. Would need 10-12 net loss to make a dent. Was last year a net loss or gain for ECNL?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Listen- it’s going to take a loooong time before the ratio of college recruits moves anywhere away from ECNL —which is sitting pretty at 77%
No parent is going to agree to jump on some bandwagon to help GA launch a takeover if it means their own daughter is in a worse exposure position for college. It’s all fun and games until your kid is the guinea pig on some long term experiments And this is exactly what will happen for every parent who has a U-8 daughter now.
It will take 8-10 years for GA to move from <30% to 77%.
Most parents on these boards don’t have that kind of time.
So I guess it’s up to the U-6 parents to drive this change forward.
Parents will take their girls out of c
All it will take is 3-4 big ECNL clubs switching from ECNL to GA and it will be over.
3-4 out of 150ish wouldn't move the needle. Would need 10-12 net loss to make a dent. Was last year a net loss or gain for ECNL?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Listen- it’s going to take a loooong time before the ratio of college recruits moves anywhere away from ECNL —which is sitting pretty at 77%
No parent is going to agree to jump on some bandwagon to help GA launch a takeover if it means their own daughter is in a worse exposure position for college. It’s all fun and games until your kid is the guinea pig on some long term experiments And this is exactly what will happen for every parent who has a U-8 daughter now.
It will take 8-10 years for GA to move from <30% to 77%.
Most parents on these boards don’t have that kind of time.
So I guess it’s up to the U-6 parents to drive this change forward.
Parents will take their girls out of c
All it will take is 3-4 big ECNL clubs switching from ECNL to GA and it will be over.