Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pelosi speaking on MSNBC: "To characterize [Tim Walz] as left is so unreal. He's right down the middle. He's a heartland of America Democrat."
Keep em coming! I can't wait for more of these type of stories from Walz on the campaign trail!
You will only be getting them from Dultuth, Minneapolis, and Rochester.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now what?
Now what?
I'd say that's game, set, match.
https://www.bing.com/images/blob?bcid=sl2cxpqvhFoHww
Anonymous wrote:Why is he so fat? He looks awful. Makes me doubt his ability to think clearly and lead if he can’t bother to eat healthfully, exercise, and/or jab himself with an injection once a week.
Same goes for Vance and Trump of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here’s the problem with the average American who doesn’t follow a lot of politics. I didn’t know anything about him and saw his photos. My first thought “she picked an old white guy? We have the same thing again?” So I googled his age and thought 60 was a mistake. He doesn’t look 60.
The average American now follows politics because our democracy is on the line. They'll understand that although he looks older than 60, he's not.
Anonymous wrote:Shapiro was the better pick. Would have gotten her PA.
But she would have lost Michigan in return as so so many Muslim voters there pissed at Biden for Gaza response….
Shapiro would have caused party infighting which is sad to see a Jewish politician as controversial…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great. Another old white guy.
He’s basically GenX. Sure not young…
He was born in 64. That aint Gen X by any measure.
Pretty close. Baby Boomers are up to 64. Gen X starts in 65.
Wikipedia might say that but those of us actually Gen X (1972) pretty much consider '69 as the starting point.
Anonymous wrote:Now what?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doofus that gets her no improved chances on the electoral map. Done to satisfy the fringe who probably won’t vote anyway.
Right?! Why didn’t she pick Shapiro and try to make a battle for PA? Did Shapiro not want it? Did the opposition research find stuff on him or Kelly? This is “meh” for me but maybe he’ll surprise us?
If she’s going to get PA, it will be on her own, she doesn’t need the state’s gov to carry the state. I like Shapiro a lot but his previous statements are a distraction in this current political environment. People have short memories though and who knows what the landscape will look like in ~10 years, when he’ll be 61 - a very normal age to run for pres. Plus I think he needs to stay as Gov longer - he’s only in his first term.
Given everything going on Israel right now, the dual loyalty thing could've totally splintered the Democrats and it will always haunt Shapiro given the IDF story. I say this as a Jew who knows the antisemitic tropes too well.
Not to mention creating a constitutional crisis if he ever had to serve in her stead as Commander in Chief.
Gross antisemitism on display. Same comment would not be said about other groups.
+1 This is the dual loyalty trope. It's antisemitism 101. Now that you know, please do better in the future.
But there is dual loyalty. Some Jewish people I know say they care more about Israel than the US. Not saying that is Shapiro but it is not uncommon. No way he can even pretend to be unbiased in Middle East politics
So why are you saying there is dual loyalty? I'd check myself if I were you.
Jew here. Jews have been the target of this since before Israel existed. Not always considered a citizen by the country they were born into and live in. The divided loyalty thing is definitely a long-running anti-semitic trope and Shapiro having volunteered in Israel and worse, on a military base plays right into it. All it takes is for someone to say, "You volunteered for the IDF and not your own military, why?" It's devastating because even if it's misleading, it paints him with suspicion rightly or wrongly and it will follow him for his career.
What do you think his answer would be? (Maybe he has, but I haven’t followed him at all.)
PP here. I don't think there is a good one. Maybe chalk it up to youthful idealism and emphasize the other volunteering work he did. But it won't go unnoticed that he didn't use that youthful idealism to serve his own country in any military capacity. That's also a classic anti-semitic trope (e.g., effete, urban intellectual). Kelly and Walz both served. That matters to more than a few folks.
For gd's sake, he didn't "serve" any country - he did summer camp IDF service. This was a very normal thing for Jewish kids to do in the 90s!
But who cares anymore because we got MY MAN WALZ!
Anonymous wrote:Oh no, the Dems picked a hetero white man who looks like everyone's Grandpa. Why are they so out of touch with America? Says the men with hair dye, fake tans, plastic surgery and makeup
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great. Another old white guy.
He’s basically GenX. Sure not young…
He was born in 64. That aint Gen X by any measure.
Pretty close. Baby Boomers are up to 64. Gen X starts in 65.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great. Another old white guy.
He’s basically GenX. Sure not young…
He was born in 64. That aint Gen X by any measure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:JD Vance is probably not taking calls right now.
Ahh please tell me Vance will be debating Walz. Pleeeeaase
Anonymous wrote:
Gross antisemitism on display. Same comment would not be said about other groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pelosi speaking on MSNBC: "To characterize [Tim Walz] as left is so unreal. He's right down the middle. He's a heartland of America Democrat."
Keep em coming! I can't wait for more of these type of stories from Walz on the campaign trail!