Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i honestly don't understand why she would wear this to a state dinner. so embarrassing.

It's hard to escape one's background.

I love how much Sanchez upsets people. She wasn’t supposed to bewitch Bezos into legitimating their affair or taking her to a stage dinner. It’s amazing.

Amazing a home-wrecking con weaseled her way into a rich dork's orbit? Dream big, sweetie.

Dude, I’m a married mom with impressive nerd credentials and a completely different aesthetic. I like Mackenzie Scott and admire her contributions. But you and your fellow huffy DCUM chunks get big mad over Sanchez and it’s a delight to read. You can’t escape your own background, obviously.

Is "chunks" a typo, or did you really just tip your hand?

No. And I mean every word. She ticks you and your fellow biddies here for a few interrelated reasons. Judgmental snotty middle-aged folk are joyless and lack the “class” they revere. N.B.: people who use “classy” as a compliment lack it completely.

Not true for me. I just happen to think it's fair to say that if a person wants to be described as a classy woman who is admired as a journalist and a philanthropist and knows how to dress appropriately for a White House dinner, then act and dress like it. If a woman wants to be described as a woman who is an expensive escort or similar to Kanye's wife with the body exposed regardless of the occasion, then go for it. But people aren't blind.

Anonymous wrote:It really feels like there’s a concerted effort to create a “cool girl” image of Lauren to the point that it’s giving pick me vibes. Quite odd.

How and who you think creating this image? I don’t think her style has changed since she started dating Bezos. So clearly this is how she likes to dress.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i honestly don't understand why she would wear this to a state dinner. so embarrassing.

It's hard to escape one's background.

I love how much Sanchez upsets people. She wasn’t supposed to bewitch Bezos into legitimating their affair or taking her to a stage dinner. It’s amazing.

Amazing a home-wrecking con weaseled her way into a rich dork's orbit? Dream big, sweetie.

Dude, I’m a married mom with impressive nerd credentials and a completely different aesthetic. I like Mackenzie Scott and admire her contributions. But you and your fellow huffy DCUM chunks get big mad over Sanchez and it’s a delight to read. You can’t escape your own background, obviously.

Is "chunks" a typo, or did you really just tip your hand?

No. And I mean every word. She ticks you and your fellow biddies here for a few interrelated reasons. Judgmental snotty middle-aged folk are joyless and lack the “class” they revere. N.B.: people who use “classy” as a compliment lack it completely.

You're making quite a few assumptions:

That I am one of the snobs who thinks that any form of sex work makes a woman subhuman (the woman on the street and Melania Trump are both earning their money)
That I am a classist and joyless
That I need a lecture on the appropriateness of the word "classy"
That "class" is having something anyone should aspire to
That a particular weight or weight category is better than others
That one's body type determines the merit of one's opinions

I will cop to being judgmental of you, whose self-satisfaction is unwarranted, and of Jeff Bezos, who blew up his marriage and disrespected his wife for the sake of someone who is after his money, not that he seems to understand that. If he was tired of Mackenzie, the correct order of operations is (1) get legally separated and (2) make an ass of yourself.

I'm also a little judgmental about Princeton, which should have taught him how to write a better mash note. His texts are of a quality not seen since Warren Harding.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This geek got his first decent bj (and she fake screams during sex), so he blew up his family and reputation for a repulsive skank. Geeky tech guys are such easy marks.

Truth!

It really feels like there’s a concerted effort to create a “cool girl” image of Lauren to the point that it’s giving pick me vibes. Quite odd.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i honestly don't understand why she would wear this to a state dinner. so embarrassing.

It's hard to escape one's background.

I love how much Sanchez upsets people. She wasn’t supposed to bewitch Bezos into legitimating their affair or taking her to a stage dinner. It’s amazing.

Amazing a home-wrecking con weaseled her way into a rich dork's orbit? Dream big, sweetie.

Dude, I’m a married mom with impressive nerd credentials and a completely different aesthetic. I like Mackenzie Scott and admire her contributions. But you and your fellow huffy DCUM chunks get big mad over Sanchez and it’s a delight to read. You can’t escape your own background, obviously.

Is "chunks" a typo, or did you really just tip your hand?

No. And I mean every word. She ticks you and your fellow biddies here for a few interrelated reasons. Judgmental snotty middle-aged folk are joyless and lack the “class” they revere. N.B.: people who use “classy” as a compliment lack it completely.

Anonymous wrote:I think she looks amazing.

She makes me want to get a boob job. What is her workout or diet secret ? I am 20 years younger than her but would kill for her body

No food
Extensive workouts
Drugs
Plastic surgery

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i honestly don't understand why she would wear this to a state dinner. so embarrassing.

It's hard to escape one's background.

I love how much Sanchez upsets people. She wasn’t supposed to bewitch Bezos into legitimating their affair or taking her to a stage dinner. It’s amazing.

Amazing a home-wrecking con weaseled her way into a rich dork's orbit? Dream big, sweetie.

Dude, I’m a married mom with impressive nerd credentials and a completely different aesthetic. I like Mackenzie Scott and admire her contributions. But you and your fellow huffy DCUM chunks get big mad over Sanchez and it’s a delight to read. You can’t escape your own background, obviously.

Is "chunks" a typo, or did you really just tip your hand?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i honestly don't understand why she would wear this to a state dinner. so embarrassing.

It's hard to escape one's background.

I love how much Sanchez upsets people. She wasn’t supposed to bewitch Bezos into legitimating their affair or taking her to a stage dinner. It’s amazing.

Amazing a home-wrecking con weaseled her way into a rich dork's orbit? Dream big, sweetie.

Dude, I’m a married mom with impressive nerd credentials and a completely different aesthetic. I like Mackenzie Scott and admire her contributions. But you and your fellow huffy DCUM chunks get big mad over Sanchez and it’s a delight to read. You can’t escape your own background, obviously.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

This geek got his first decent bj (and she fake screams during sex), so he blew up his family and reputation for a repulsive skank. Geeky tech guys are such easy marks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t Marilyn Monroe dressed even worse than this boobs out , not wearing any underwear singing in a baby voice to the President in front of his wife and family?

No, Marilyn Monroe was more sophisticated than LS and Finnegan Biden. She didn’t pop her tits out for attention.


Marilyn Monroe showed less cleavage bending over, wearing a strapless dress, exiting a car, than Thing 1 and 2 did at the WH state dinner.
You can see when Kim K wore MM’s iconic dress, it was not overly revealing. It was not cut specifically low to show off breasts.

Not specifically low to show cleavage, but definitely showed breasts when worn without a bra! I actually think it's more revealing than the other two since it's jiggly and you can see underboob, outline of areola, nipples, etc. not to mention very detailed buttcheek outline. It's more "naked."

MM sang Happy Birthday to JFK at Madison Square Gardens. She wasn’t at the White House.


Monroe's iconic dress was designed by costume designer Bob Mackie, who was hired to sketch the design for the leading fashion designer of the time, Jean Louis, who paid $1,440.33 for its construction.

Meanwhile, LS and her “Resort Collection” are representing America at The State Dinner for the Japanese PM and his wife at the White House.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:i honestly don't understand why she would wear this to a state dinner. so embarrassing.

It's hard to escape one's background.

I love how much Sanchez upsets people. She wasn’t supposed to bewitch Bezos into legitimating their affair or taking her to a stage dinner. It’s amazing.

Amazing a home-wrecking con weaseled her way into a rich dork's orbit? Dream big, sweetie.

Dude, I’m a married mom with impressive nerd credentials and a completely different aesthetic. I like Mackenzie Scott and admire her contributions. But you and your fellow huffy DCUM chunks get big mad over Sanchez and it’s a delight to read. You can’t escape your own background, obviously.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t Marilyn Monroe dressed even worse than this boobs out , not wearing any underwear singing in a baby voice to the President in front of his wife and family?

No, Marilyn Monroe was more sophisticated than LS and Finnegan Biden. She didn’t pop her tits out for attention.


Marilyn Monroe showed less cleavage bending over, wearing a strapless dress, exiting a car, than Thing 1 and 2 did at the WH state dinner.
You can see when Kim K wore MM’s iconic dress, it was not overly revealing. It was not cut specifically low to show off breasts.

Not specifically low to show cleavage, but definitely showed breasts when worn without a bra! I actually think it's more revealing than the other two since it's jiggly and you can see underboob, outline of areola, nipples, etc. not to mention very detailed buttcheek outline. It's more "naked."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t Marilyn Monroe dressed even worse than this boobs out , not wearing any underwear singing in a baby voice to the President in front of his wife and family?

No, Marilyn Monroe was more sophisticated than LS and Finnegan Biden. She didn’t pop her tits out for attention.


Marilyn Monroe showed less cleavage bending over, wearing a strapless dress, exiting a car, than Thing 1 and 2 did at the WH state dinner.
You can see when Kim K wore MM’s iconic dress, it was not overly revealing. It was not cut specifically low to show off breasts.

+1 Also, Marilyn Monroe was a movie star. Supposedly, Ms. Sanchez wishes to be known as a journalist and philanthropist.

Marilyn Monroe ODed on drugs. A movie star is not a noble profession like you pretend it to be.

Did I say it was a noble profession? Nope!

You didn’t need to. Yep!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wasn’t Marilyn Monroe dressed even worse than this boobs out , not wearing any underwear singing in a baby voice to the President in front of his wife and family?

No, Marilyn Monroe was more sophisticated than LS and Finnegan Biden. She didn’t pop her tits out for attention.


Marilyn Monroe showed less cleavage bending over, wearing a strapless dress, exiting a car, than Thing 1 and 2 did at the WH state dinner.
You can see when Kim K wore MM’s iconic dress, it was not overly revealing. It was not cut specifically low to show off breasts.

+1 Also, Marilyn Monroe was a movie star. Supposedly, Ms. Sanchez wishes to be known as a journalist and philanthropist.

Marilyn Monroe ODed on drugs. A movie star is not a noble profession like you pretend it to be.

Did I say it was a noble profession? Nope!