Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arguments were today. Fifth Circuit is conservative but this is still disappointing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/17/abortion-pill-appeal-court-arguments/
They will ban it. There has never been any question about it.
Well then, there goes abortion in the US, just like Poland. Will be interesting to see if women shrug their shoulders on this one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arguments were today. Fifth Circuit is conservative but this is still disappointing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/17/abortion-pill-appeal-court-arguments/
They will ban it. There has never been any question about it.
Anonymous wrote:Arguments were today. Fifth Circuit is conservative but this is still disappointing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/17/abortion-pill-appeal-court-arguments/
Anonymous wrote:Arguments were today. Fifth Circuit is conservative but this is still disappointing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/17/abortion-pill-appeal-court-arguments/
Anonymous wrote:
Alito is not a man who is used to debating. We’re not all members of the Federalist Society fawning over how “smart” he is, or members of the oligarchy trying to buy him off. Some of us are just calling it like it is - he’s a hack, end of story. Shame he is out there pretending to be a martyr for some holy cause instead of acknowledging that he has earned his reputation. The Bar isn’t going to defend him because there is nothing to defend. All we have is the rule of law, and Alito is a direct threat to that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Thomas has some gall - with the Grand Canyon sized gaps in his ethics - being prepared to wrestle medical and scientific authority and 23 years of safe use of drug on advice of extremist Trump appointed judge from Texas.
He really has no concern that he looks like not only a corrupt old fool but one with no concern for appearances, let alone function.
It’s pretty clear what the goal is - leftists want to overturn the SC balance through smears.
Breyer came out with a statement saying that Thomas is a man of integrity.
Nah. No smears are needed when SC justices, like Thomas, are blatantly corrupt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Thomas has some gall - with the Grand Canyon sized gaps in his ethics - being prepared to wrestle medical and scientific authority and 23 years of safe use of drug on advice of extremist Trump appointed judge from Texas.
He really has no concern that he looks like not only a corrupt old fool but one with no concern for appearances, let alone function.
It’s pretty clear what the goal is - leftists want to overturn the SC balance through smears.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Thomas has some gall - with the Grand Canyon sized gaps in his ethics - being prepared to wrestle medical and scientific authority and 23 years of safe use of drug on advice of extremist Trump appointed judge from Texas.
He really has no concern that he looks like not only a corrupt old fool but one with no concern for appearances, let alone function.
It’s pretty clear what the goal is - leftists want to overturn the SC balance through smears.