Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/patrickruffini/status/1873431971503956334?s=46
Big time Republican pollster
“ It wasn’t just minorities who won Trump the election, but ethnic voters of all stripes: Italians, Irish, Eastern Europeans, Arabs, Iranians, Armenians, French, and more.
If the trends nationwide were similar to those of Northern European stock, Harris wins.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are Midwestern Americans of Scandinavian descent the same type of White as Yankee WASPs? I can’t keep up with all the categorizing here.
No, they arent.
Anonymous wrote:Are Midwestern Americans of Scandinavian descent the same type of White as Yankee WASPs? I can’t keep up with all the categorizing here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every single white person I know claims that their family came from the Mayflower and they have some fake family tree to prove it. My Japanese grandmother came on the Mayflower too.![]()
I'm one of these "ethnic whites" but I'll never admit it in real life. I cant stand these "Im not a regular white person, my family is really Irish" people. No, fool, drinking beer and liking green things isnt your ethnicity and youve never been to the UK.
They mean people who are caucasian but speak a language other than english. It's most definitely a different identity box, not just a political construct. They largely socialize in ethic groups where they speak their home language and don't really assimilate. You just haven't noticed them because they don't talk to you and they look white.Anonymous wrote:“White ethnics”? Keep on sorting people into those identity boxes, Democrats. Never change.
Anonymous wrote:Side question: What's the consensus on blacks who descended from slaves? Are they more "fill in the blank" than blacks that immigrated?
Anonymous wrote:they are establishment voters because they ARE the establishment.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Within the white population has anyone else noticed that white-ethnics (Italians, polish, Eastern Euro, Irish) seem to be have a higher incidence of maga than mayflower whites/dar eligible types.
Thoughts? Isn’t this the exact opposite of 20-30 years ago?
Very, very, very, very few Mayflower/DAR eligible types are MAGA. They don't have to be.
MAGA is (mostly) for angry, lower middle class white men (not that there's anything wrong with any of those categorizations) who are convinced someone's "taking" something from them.
+1 the WASPY people I knew from Connecticut or the Boston suburbs were more Rockefeller Republicans, Romney-to-Clinton voters. Now voting Biden.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can we stop “othering” people? It’s not a good look no matter who’s doing it.
Don’t be a buzzkill, it’s not a “look” at all
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Within the white population has anyone else noticed that white-ethnics (Italians, polish, Eastern Euro, Irish) seem to be have a higher incidence of maga than mayflower whites/dar eligible types.
Thoughts? Isn’t this the exact opposite of 20-30 years ago?
Very, very, very, very few Mayflower/DAR eligible types are MAGA. They don't have to be.
MAGA is (mostly) for angry, lower middle class white men (not that there's anything wrong with any of those categorizations) who are convinced someone's "taking" something from them.
And that's exactly what the GOP has tapped into and promoted - that the "other" is responsible for their miserable lives.
Yes, true. They're angry because someone's "taking," or has already taken, something from them... and they're right, someone has... but it's not blacks, or Mexicans, or drag queens. It's American corporatism (a shout-out to the Kochs!)
The GOP plays these poor donkeys like fiddles. As but one example, they hate(d) the effort of "Obamacare" to deliver universal coverage, but struggle with health bills, go without treatment.... etc. etc. etc.
they are establishment voters because they ARE the establishment.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Within the white population has anyone else noticed that white-ethnics (Italians, polish, Eastern Euro, Irish) seem to be have a higher incidence of maga than mayflower whites/dar eligible types.
Thoughts? Isn’t this the exact opposite of 20-30 years ago?
Very, very, very, very few Mayflower/DAR eligible types are MAGA. They don't have to be.
MAGA is (mostly) for angry, lower middle class white men (not that there's anything wrong with any of those categorizations) who are convinced someone's "taking" something from them.
+1 the WASPY people I knew from Connecticut or the Boston suburbs were more Rockefeller Republicans, Romney-to-Clinton voters. Now voting Biden.