Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This part stands out to me in the article re how he got the gun:
Ellenson, the attorney for the boy’s family, said in an interview that the gun was secured with a trigger lock and kept on the top shelf of the mother’s bedroom closet. Ellenson said it is unclear how the boy got hold of the gun.
Also, how did he write a threatening note at age 6? Most kids can't even spell (even kid-spell) this stuff. Burn the teacher and watch her die??? Did the parents write the note? If he actually wrote it, he should be in a school for genius psychos.
Anonymous wrote:This part stands out to me in the article re how he got the gun:
Ellenson, the attorney for the boy’s family, said in an interview that the gun was secured with a trigger lock and kept on the top shelf of the mother’s bedroom closet. Ellenson said it is unclear how the boy got hold of the gun.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Who decided the parent didn't need to be sitting next to this kid on that day? Hope that administrator who approved his attendace without them goes to jail TOO. Seriously. Kid never belonged there in the first place.
It was likely a perfect storm of factors. Just speculating, but here’s some possibilities:
He’s had 5 months of somewhat reasonable behavior while his parents supervised him in class. It seems safe to take the risk because that particular day, mom is feeling unwell and dad can’t take off work at such short notice because his boss has already warned him twice that his absences are a problem. If he goes to school unsupervised and gets into trouble, what’s the worse that could happen? He’s six after all. Mom would come pick him up. Meanwhile, she’ll take some DayQuil and nap until dismissal.
Again, this is just a possibility, but it’s a decision many of us should recognize that we might make under the same circumstances.
And this would have been a reasonable set of risks to take, had the parents not chosen to have a gun at home. This is on the parents. No parents of a child with this behavioral profile should have a firearm at home. No way, no how. I say this as a parent of a child with emotional dysregulation due to prenatal alcohol exposure. When my child was the age of the child in this situation, they would easily have tried to get access to a weapon when in an extremely dysregulated condition. Even though I grew up in a part of the US where gun ownership is common, and I grew up around guns, there was/is NO WAY I would ever have a gun in my home because of my child's disability. Children have a knack for getting at prohibited items. The risks are just too great.
Anonymous wrote:so is he in a psychiatric hospital now? that sounds good; I would not want him returning to school at this point.
Anonymous wrote:New WaPo article has incredible accounts of students past violent behavior. I dont understand how he could have done these things IF his parents or grandparents were with him at school. The parents’ statement made it seem like the week of the shooting was the ONLY time they weren’t there. But WaPo article outlines him making threats, throwing furniture, barricading the doors and wandering around campus unsupervised. Where were his parents when this was going on?
Holy f-ing $hit.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/01/21/richneck-elementary-school-shooting-warnings-downplayed/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New WaPo article has incredible accounts of students past violent behavior. I dont understand how he could have done these things IF his parents or grandparents were with him at school. The parents’ statement made it seem like the week of the shooting was the ONLY time they weren’t there. But WaPo article outlines him making threats, throwing furniture, barricading the doors and wandering around campus unsupervised. Where were his parents when this was going on?
Holy f-ing $hit.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/01/21/richneck-elementary-school-shooting-warnings-downplayed/
I hate to say I called it, but I did, early on in this thread. Other teachers concurred.
Anonymous wrote:This part stands out to me in the article re how he got the gun:
Ellenson, the attorney for the boy’s family, said in an interview that the gun was secured with a trigger lock and kept on the top shelf of the mother’s bedroom closet. Ellenson said it is unclear how the boy got hold of the gun.
Anonymous wrote:New WaPo article has incredible accounts of students past violent behavior. I dont understand how he could have done these things IF his parents or grandparents were with him at school. The parents’ statement made it seem like the week of the shooting was the ONLY time they weren’t there. But WaPo article outlines him making threats, throwing furniture, barricading the doors and wandering around campus unsupervised. Where were his parents when this was going on?
Holy f-ing $hit.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/01/21/richneck-elementary-school-shooting-warnings-downplayed/
Anonymous wrote:No offense, but a child bringing bullets to school should be a suspension, I don't care what age.
We don't know the circumstances of all of this and we probably will never know. But what we do know is that a problem had been identified and more extreme measures were taken to try and handle the situation. Based on the measures that were been taken AND his bringing bullets a week before, he should not have been in that classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who decided the parent didn't need to be sitting next to this kid on that day? Hope that administrator who approved his attendace without them goes to jail TOO. Seriously. Kid never belonged there in the first place.
It was likely a perfect storm of factors. Just speculating, but here’s some possibilities:
He’s had 5 months of somewhat reasonable behavior while his parents supervised him in class. It seems safe to take the risk because that particular day, mom is feeling unwell and dad can’t take off work at such short notice because his boss has already warned him twice that his absences are a problem. If he goes to school unsupervised and gets into trouble, what’s the worse that could happen? He’s six after all. Mom would come pick him up. Meanwhile, she’ll take some DayQuil and nap until dismissal.
Again, this is just a possibility, but it’s a decision many of us should recognize that we might make under the same circumstances.
You lost me there. There is no way I would ever have a gun in my home, period. There is no need for a gun. I would also never live in a home with a pool either. No need for that. They are both dangerous and unless you watch your kid 24/7, they are accidents waiting to happen.