Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mayor should be encouraging New Yorkers to house at least one immigrant in every home with 500 extra square feet over 2000 square feet with less than 4 occupants. C’mon New York! You can do this!
Agree. We need these people. There is space in many SFHs for at least one perhaps two or three more people. In a time of climate emergency we need to use what we have to maximize efficiency. Millions more will be coming each year and it’s the responsibility of Americans to take them in when they have unused space.
It is the responsibility of Americans who voted for this. Don't hold those who voted for Trump responsible for this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Texas get federal money to deal with immigrants? If so, and since they are shipping them to New York, should't New York get that money now?
There is never enough federal money for border states. When migrants get injured or sick they go to local hospitals and those hospitals aren’t reimbursed. When migrants enroll their kids into school the state and local communities pay. There is no way the sales tax or unaccounted for social security tax is making up for medical and school bills.
Every migrant child Texas ships to NYC saves the state $ 10,000 a year (what it Texas pays to educate one student) and costs NYC over $20,000 (what NYC pays to educate a child). So Texas economically benefits from busing all the migrant children out of Texas.
Texas is causing the cost of dealing with them to double. NYC should sue them for the difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I love how Democrats are all of a sudden so *concerned* about the huge influxes of illegal immigrants. When it's occurring in their backyard, it's kind of hard to gaslight it all away. Thoughts and prayers!
Democrats are concerned because of the skyrocketing numbers.
Congress is the only one that can change asylum laws, and they haven’t even tried to do that. Republicans benefit from this, so don’t expect any effort from them.
Anonymous wrote:I love how Democrats are all of a sudden so *concerned* about the huge influxes of illegal immigrants. When it's occurring in their backyard, it's kind of hard to gaslight it all away. Thoughts and prayers!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Texas get federal money to deal with immigrants? If so, and since they are shipping them to New York, should't New York get that money now?
There is never enough federal money for border states. When migrants get injured or sick they go to local hospitals and those hospitals aren’t reimbursed. When migrants enroll their kids into school the state and local communities pay. There is no way the sales tax or unaccounted for social security tax is making up for medical and school bills.
Every migrant child Texas ships to NYC saves the state $ 10,000 a year (what it Texas pays to educate one student) and costs NYC over $20,000 (what NYC pays to educate a child). So Texas economically benefits from busing all the migrant children out of Texas.
Texas is causing the cost of dealing with them to double. NYC should sue them for the difference.
The migrants WANT to go to NYC - especially since it is a Right to Shelter city.
And, the Biden administration has sent FAR more than Texas has sent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mayor should be encouraging New Yorkers to house at least one immigrant in every home with 500 extra square feet over 2000 square feet with less than 4 occupants. C’mon New York! You can do this!
Agree. We need these people. There is space in many SFHs for at least one perhaps two or three more people. In a time of climate emergency we need to use what we have to maximize efficiency. Millions more will be coming each year and it’s the responsibility of Americans to take them in when they have unused space.
So you'll be housing how many, exactly?
DP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mayor should be encouraging New Yorkers to house at least one immigrant in every home with 500 extra square feet over 2000 square feet with less than 4 occupants. C’mon New York! You can do this!
Agree. We need these people. There is space in many SFHs for at least one perhaps two or three more people. In a time of climate emergency we need to use what we have to maximize efficiency. Millions more will be coming each year and it’s the responsibility of Americans to take them in when they have unused space.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Texas get federal money to deal with immigrants? If so, and since they are shipping them to New York, should't New York get that money now?
There is never enough federal money for border states. When migrants get injured or sick they go to local hospitals and those hospitals aren’t reimbursed. When migrants enroll their kids into school the state and local communities pay. There is no way the sales tax or unaccounted for social security tax is making up for medical and school bills.
Every migrant child Texas ships to NYC saves the state $ 10,000 a year (what it Texas pays to educate one student) and costs NYC over $20,000 (what NYC pays to educate a child). So Texas economically benefits from busing all the migrant children out of Texas.
Texas is causing the cost of dealing with them to double. NYC should sue them for the difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Texas get federal money to deal with immigrants? If so, and since they are shipping them to New York, should't New York get that money now?
Maybe a proportion. Of course, border states deal with the bulk of new arrivals and should get a cut of the money for that. If a place declares itself a sanctuary, that means they won’t cooperate with authorities and should therefore get no federal money to deal with migrants lacking the proper paper work.
They already weren't getting paid to do DHS's job for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Texas get federal money to deal with immigrants? If so, and since they are shipping them to New York, should't New York get that money now?
There is never enough federal money for border states. When migrants get injured or sick they go to local hospitals and those hospitals aren’t reimbursed. When migrants enroll their kids into school the state and local communities pay. There is no way the sales tax or unaccounted for social security tax is making up for medical and school bills.
Every migrant child Texas ships to NYC saves the state $ 10,000 a year (what it Texas pays to educate one student) and costs NYC over $20,000 (what NYC pays to educate a child). So Texas economically benefits from busing all the migrant children out of Texas.
So Democrats want open borders and every taxpayer in America has to pony up the cash to support anyone in the world who wants to live here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Texas get federal money to deal with immigrants? If so, and since they are shipping them to New York, should't New York get that money now?
There is never enough federal money for border states. When migrants get injured or sick they go to local hospitals and those hospitals aren’t reimbursed. When migrants enroll their kids into school the state and local communities pay. There is no way the sales tax or unaccounted for social security tax is making up for medical and school bills.
Every migrant child Texas ships to NYC saves the state $ 10,000 a year (what it Texas pays to educate one student) and costs NYC over $20,000 (what NYC pays to educate a child). So Texas economically benefits from busing all the migrant children out of Texas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn't Texas get federal money to deal with immigrants? If so, and since they are shipping them to New York, should't New York get that money now?
Maybe a proportion. Of course, border states deal with the bulk of new arrivals and should get a cut of the money for that. If a place declares itself a sanctuary, that means they won’t cooperate with authorities and should therefore get no federal money to deal with migrants lacking the proper paper work.