Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are all of the loser Internet detectives who accused his wife of the murder? Hope you’re all pounding sand and feeling like garbage!

I didn't post but I thought she did it, too. It was the logical thing to think. I don't feel like garbage at all. Why would I?

I thought it was suicide and the wife was covering for appearance's sake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

You know nothing about this family or the perpetrator and are wildly speculating.

What tipped you off? When I said, “my guess is”.

And what are you accomplishing by speculating on crap you know nothing about?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the suspect’s IG. He follows the Glyers, they don’t follow him.

https://instagram.com/jdhower33?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Seems like a real weirdo.

That's a really strange Instagram if that's his. I sense something off mentally.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

You know nothing about this family or the perpetrator and are wildly speculating.

What tipped you off? When I said, “my guess is”.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

You know nothing about this family or the perpetrator and are wildly speculating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

Oh here we go with the mentally ill narrative.

The guy couldn't just be an evil degenerate?

PP here. He’s crazy and evil. You can be both. Mentally I’ll does not mean he’s innocent or should have our sympathy. He was crazy and evil as well.

On a separate note:
I can’t believe the misogyny of some on this board to still insist the wife is somehow involved even after the crazy, evil man is arrested.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

Oh here we go with the mentally ill narrative.

The guy couldn't just be an evil degenerate?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be great if the police would fill us in as to whether we have anything to worry about. A random home invasion homicide in a place where there has literally not been a homicide for almost 15 years seems cause for concern to me.

It was clearly targeted. You don't need to worry.

Again, with the parroting "it was targeted" over and over. Give it a rest. You have no idea whether it was targeted, yet you keep saying it definitively as if you Know The Truth. You just want it to be targeted, either so you can feel like "It's still safe here, that can't happen to me" or because you want to crank up drama around a supposed hit job. Pathetic.

Let's wait for the real investigators to do their real jobs. Not for armchair conspiracy theorists to spout baseless theories.

Well guess we were right. He was targeted. By an acquaintance no less.

Second degree murder? How is this not first degree?

I was also wondering why this wasn't 1st degree murder. It sounds like an execution.

I believe they can change it later, they’re probably still gathering evidence but needed to arrest and charge him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are all of the loser Internet detectives who accused his wife of the murder? Hope you’re all pounding sand and feeling like garbage!

I didn't post but I thought she did it, too. It was the logical thing to think. I don't feel like garbage at all. Why would I?

I thought it was suicide and the wife was covering for appearance's sake.

That makes sense, too. That was like the third down. First: the wife. Second: the wife had a lover and he did it. Third: suicide.

I am glad that they caught the guy and that he is in custody. The whole thing is very scary. Those poor little kids.

Anonymous wrote:This is the suspect’s IG. He follows the Glyers, they don’t follow him.

https://instagram.com/jdhower33?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

Seems like a real weirdo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It would be great if the police would fill us in as to whether we have anything to worry about. A random home invasion homicide in a place where there has literally not been a homicide for almost 15 years seems cause for concern to me.

It was clearly targeted. You don't need to worry.

Again, with the parroting "it was targeted" over and over. Give it a rest. You have no idea whether it was targeted, yet you keep saying it definitively as if you Know The Truth. You just want it to be targeted, either so you can feel like "It's still safe here, that can't happen to me" or because you want to crank up drama around a supposed hit job. Pathetic.

Let's wait for the real investigators to do their real jobs. Not for armchair conspiracy theorists to spout baseless theories.

Well guess we were right. He was targeted. By an acquaintance no less.

Second degree murder? How is this not first degree?

I was also wondering why this wasn't 1st degree murder. It sounds like an execution.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where are all of the loser Internet detectives who accused his wife of the murder? Hope you’re all pounding sand and feeling like garbage!

I didn't post but I thought she did it, too. It was the logical thing to think. I don't feel like garbage at all. Why would I?

I thought it was suicide and the wife was covering for appearance's sake.

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.

Anonymous wrote:This guy clearly envied the victim’s life. Perhaps he wanted to work with Glyer. My guess is that victim was polite but got weirded out and distanced himself from shooter. That’s likely when the obsessing and anger kicked in. I don’t think victim did anything wrong, just got into the crosshairs of a mentally ill person with a gun. The question is whether the shooter was diagnosed and if any laws could have prevented this. I don’t think so. If there’s no formal diagnosis, any proposed law wouldn’t have stopped this. This is why preventing mentally I’ll from purchasing firearms is difficult. Most are likely undiagnosed even if the average person can see it.