Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooooo, what’s allowed March 1? Is there a consensus?

Mask optional come March 1. It’s the law.

-1. FCPS files a lawsuit next week on the issue of local control and asks for a TRO.

Could be. FCPS is on a mission to get more Republicans elected.

Seems like it!!

I think that may be a tall order. I think most of us would prefer unelecting some of the SB incumbents. I don’t see an R winning. Maybe they sit out from the areas they can’t win, and some independents push out those there now. Independent Fairfax doesn’t mean Rs take it all. Just those who the FCDC selected. Just a thought.

FCDC expunged a few people trying to get more sane candidates on the sample ballot from the rolls last month. I don’t know what group has enough pull with senior citizens who remember FCPS from the 90s and vote D to change it up.

Maybe Chap’s PAC will be able to help.

Can you explain more about what happened at FCDC? Thx

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooooo, what’s allowed March 1? Is there a consensus?

Mask optional come March 1. It’s the law.

-1. FCPS files a lawsuit next week on the issue of local control and asks for a TRO.

Could be. FCPS is on a mission to get more Republicans elected.

Seems like it!!

I think that may be a tall order. I think most of us would prefer unelecting some of the SB incumbents. I don’t see an R winning. Maybe they sit out from the areas they can’t win, and some independents push out those there now. Independent Fairfax doesn’t mean Rs take it all. Just those who the FCDC selected. Just a thought.

FCDC expunged a few people trying to get more sane candidates on the sample ballot from the rolls last month. I don’t know what group has enough pull with senior citizens who remember FCPS from the 90s and vote D to change it up.

Maybe Chap’s PAC will be able to help.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooooo, what’s allowed March 1? Is there a consensus?

Mask optional come March 1. It’s the law.

-1. FCPS files a lawsuit next week on the issue of local control and asks for a TRO.

Could be. FCPS is on a mission to get more Republicans elected.

Seems like it!!

I think that may be a tall order. I think most of us would prefer unelecting some of the SB incumbents. I don’t see an R winning. Maybe they sit out from the areas they can’t win, and some independents push out those there now. Independent Fairfax doesn’t mean Rs take it all. Just those who the FCDC selected. Just a thought.

I’m just looking at midterms right now. Not the 2023 SB yet.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ I mean you should NOT do a stricter quality mask mandate in a time of vaccines

Expect the vaccines don’t stop transmission and wear off quickly.

False and false. Vaccines make you over two and a half times less likely to catch Covid, and you can’t spread what you don’t get.

Vaccines continue to provide significant protection long after your last dose.

The “wear off quickly” crowd doesn’t understand T Cell immunity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooooo, what’s allowed March 1? Is there a consensus?

Mask optional come March 1. It’s the law.

-1. FCPS files a lawsuit next week on the issue of local control and asks for a TRO.

Could be. FCPS is on a mission to get more Republicans elected.

Seems like it!!

I think that may be a tall order. I think most of us would prefer unelecting some of the SB incumbents. I don’t see an R winning. Maybe they sit out from the areas they can’t win, and some independents push out those there now. Independent Fairfax doesn’t mean Rs take it all. Just those who the FCDC selected. Just a thought.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooooo, what’s allowed March 1? Is there a consensus?

Mask optional come March 1. It’s the law.

-1. FCPS files a lawsuit next week on the issue of local control and asks for a TRO.

Could be. FCPS is on a mission to get more Republicans elected.

Seems like it!!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ I mean you should NOT do a stricter quality mask mandate in a time of vaccines

Expect the vaccines don’t stop transmission and wear off quickly.

They protect well against severe disease. Stop denigrating them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ I mean you should NOT do a stricter quality mask mandate in a time of vaccines

Expect the vaccines don’t stop transmission and wear off quickly.

False and false. Vaccines make you over two and a half times less likely to catch Covid, and you can’t spread what you don’t get.

Vaccines continue to provide significant protection long after your last dose.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooooo, what’s allowed March 1? Is there a consensus?

Mask optional come March 1. It’s the law.

-1. FCPS files a lawsuit next week on the issue of local control and asks for a TRO.

Could be. FCPS is on a mission to get more Republicans elected.

Anonymous wrote:^ I mean you should NOT do a stricter quality mask mandate in a time of vaccines

Expect the vaccines don’t stop transmission and wear off quickly.

^ I mean you should NOT do a stricter quality mask mandate in a time of vaccines

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooooo, what’s allowed March 1? Is there a consensus?

Mask optional come March 1. It’s the law.

-1. FCPS files a lawsuit next week on the issue of local control and asks for a TRO.

On what legal basis?? State law says no mask mandate. Even if, arguendo, 2 state laws conflict, the more specific one controls. Hence, the mask mandate ban controls.

VA ACLU seems to argue it’s discrimination against people with special needs to allow mask optional but I don’t think they will win, personally. The mask rule as is - that allows cloth is totally pointless. And you should do a stricter mask mandate in a time of widespread vaccine.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooooo, what’s allowed March 1? Is there a consensus?

Mask optional come March 1. It’s the law.

-1. FCPS files a lawsuit next week on the issue of local control and asks for a TRO.

FCPS is addicted to racking up the L's. They need another one for their trophy case of idiocy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sooooooo, what’s allowed March 1? Is there a consensus?

Mask optional come March 1. It’s the law.

-1. FCPS files a lawsuit next week on the issue of local control and asks for a TRO.

On what legal basis?? State law says no mask mandate. Even if, arguendo, 2 state laws conflict, the more specific one controls. Hence, the mask mandate ban controls.

Anonymous wrote:So strange that people didn’t complain about seat belts becoming law or all the smoking changes but now the thought of a mask makes them meltdown. Such a sad society we are.

In your post is a big reason for the strong pushback right now. Basically you seem to see it as the evolution of safety - Seat Belts Required, No Smoking, and now Masks Required In Many Settings. A large number of us do not want American society and rules to evolve in that direction and do not see it in terms of "It's Probably Safer Isn't It - Just Comply".