Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in NW DC and almost all of my friends here went to elite universities and had undergrad paid for by family.
I grew up near Reading, PA. My mother was a nurse and my father worked for the state of PA.
I had loans for undergrad, as did my entire cohort of friends. Many of us only paid off our own loans by age 30 or 35. Those who went on to professional school were still paying at age 35. My brother went
to medical school and didn't finish residency until age 32 and only then could he start aggressively paying off a huge debt and his salary as a physician is still not impressive by DCUM standards.
I think people on DCUM forget that many people are paying for their own education well into adulthood. It's a whole different life if you start off your adult life with giant loans.
The person who gives the example "well, just keep living in the house you bought at age 27!" is so out of touch. You know that many of us had NO ability to buy a house at age 27?!!! We had 100K in loans at that point and were living with 3 roommates trying to pay them off.
Do your kids a favor and have them graduate with minimum debt/loans. You know how limiting loans can be on your upward mobility. Send them to your state universities! Why is this so difficult?
Anonymous wrote:I'm in NW DC and almost all of my friends here went to elite universities and had undergrad paid for by family.
I grew up near Reading, PA. My mother was a nurse and my father worked for the state of PA.
I had loans for undergrad, as did my entire cohort of friends. Many of us only paid off our own loans by age 30 or 35. Those who went on to professional school were still paying at age 35. My brother went
to medical school and didn't finish residency until age 32 and only then could he start aggressively paying off a huge debt and his salary as a physician is still not impressive by DCUM standards.
I think people on DCUM forget that many people are paying for their own education well into adulthood. It's a whole different life if you start off your adult life with giant loans.
The person who gives the example "well, just keep living in the house you bought at age 27!" is so out of touch. You know that many of us had NO ability to buy a house at age 27?!!! We had 100K in loans at that point and were living with 3 roommates trying to pay them off.
Anonymous wrote:I'm in NW DC and almost all of my friends here went to elite universities and had undergrad paid for by family.
I grew up near Reading, PA. My mother was a nurse and my father worked for the state of PA.
I had loans for undergrad, as did my entire cohort of friends. Many of us only paid off our own loans by age 30 or 35. Those who went on to professional school were still paying at age 35. My brother went
to medical school and didn't finish residency until age 32 and only then could he start aggressively paying off a huge debt and his salary as a physician is still not impressive by DCUM standards.
I think people on DCUM forget that many people are paying for their own education well into adulthood. It's a whole different life if you start off your adult life with giant loans.
The person who gives the example "well, just keep living in the house you bought at age 27!" is so out of touch. You know that many of us had NO ability to buy a house at age 27?!!! We had 100K in loans at that point and were living with 3 roommates trying to pay them off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:new poster here
Wow. I thought we were a "donut hole" family but I guess not.
What is a step below "donut hole" called? We make too much to qualify for aid, but paying for an expensive school would involve far more than "liquidating assets." It would be more like taking on a second full time job, skipping at least one meal a day, absolutely zero entertainment budget (not even cable tv or netflix) etc.
Well, there is this thing that you had 18 years to save for college. Which is what most people do.
There's a lack of understanding that some people don't make enough for save for 50-80K a year for college WHILE paying for all their other living expenses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:new poster here
Wow. I thought we were a "donut hole" family but I guess not.
What is a step below "donut hole" called? We make too much to qualify for aid, but paying for an expensive school would involve far more than "liquidating assets." It would be more like taking on a second full time job, skipping at least one meal a day, absolutely zero entertainment budget (not even cable tv or netflix) etc.
Well, there is this thing that you had 18 years to save for college. Which is what most people do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:new poster here
Wow. I thought we were a "donut hole" family but I guess not.
What is a step below "donut hole" called? We make too much to qualify for aid, but paying for an expensive school would involve far more than "liquidating assets." It would be more like taking on a second full time job, skipping at least one meal a day, absolutely zero entertainment budget (not even cable tv or netflix) etc.
Well, there is this thing that you had 18 years to save for college. Which is what most people do.
Anonymous wrote:I love data.
People who are saying families with $150-250k incomes aren't receiving need-based financial aid.....have you actually done a net price calculator? Has your child gone through the process and your aid award wasn't what the college said it would be on their website or places like https://myintuition.org/?
You can very quickly and easily play around on https://myintuition.org/ to see what different schools expect you to pay.
For a family with $200k HHI, $650k home value, $100k in liquid savings (cash), $1M in retirement, and $175k in non-retirement investments, schools would expect you to pay (none of these include loans):
$58k - Amherst
$51k - Brown
$59k - Dartmouth
$48k - Harvard
$52k - Williams
For a family with $185k HHI, $650k home value, $100k in liquid savings (cash), $1M in retirement, and $175k in non-retirement investments, I got the following cost (none of these include loans):
$55k - Amherst
$47k - Brown
$55k - Dartmouth
$42k - Harvard
$48k - Williams
For a family with $150k HHI, $650k home value, $100k in liquid savings (cash), $1M in retirement, and $175k in non-retirement investments, I got the following cost (none of these include loans):
$44k - Amherst
$38k - Brown
$45k - Dartmouth
$28k - Harvard
$38k - Williams
The Fed says UMC is roughly $75k-$127k HHI. Only 9% of Americans have $100k or more (on average) in savings. There's less clear data on what the average UMC person has in investment funds - most research includes it in "savings." So let's do this again with what is probably considered the typical UMC, and keep the house and retirement values the same (though these are really high compared to the reality of "most" Americans):
For this family -- $127k HHI, $650k home value, $60k in liquid savings (cash), $1M in retirement, $50k in non-retirement investments, colleges would expect a student/family to pay:
$30k - Amherst
$25k - Brown
$30k - Dartmouth
$14k - Harvard
$31k - Yale
The people who get "no aid" with $150k HHI are the people who have significant non-retirement assets (investments/cash). Colleges do NOT consider retirement funds in calculating your financial aid.
Anonymous wrote:
It is impossible for middle class (true MC families here in MoCo) families to save. My HHI is 106k. My EFC is 28k. How was I supposed to save 100k during that time?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:new poster here
Wow. I thought we were a "donut hole" family but I guess not.
What is a step below "donut hole" called? We make too much to qualify for aid, but paying for an expensive school would involve far more than "liquidating assets." It would be more like taking on a second full time job, skipping at least one meal a day, absolutely zero entertainment budget (not even cable tv or netflix) etc.
Well, there is this thing that you had 18 years to save for college. Which is what most people do.
You, pp, are a shit. God Bless that you were never bankrupt or nearly bankrupt from non-covered medical expenses, never had to support other family members, etc. FU
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:new poster here
Wow. I thought we were a "donut hole" family but I guess not.
What is a step below "donut hole" called? We make too much to qualify for aid, but paying for an expensive school would involve far more than "liquidating assets." It would be more like taking on a second full time job, skipping at least one meal a day, absolutely zero entertainment budget (not even cable tv or netflix) etc.
Well, there is this thing that you had 18 years to save for college. Which is what most people do.
GTFO
It is impossible for middle class (true MC families here in MoCo) families to save. My HHI is 106k. My EFC is 28k. How was I supposed to save 100k during that time?
Zero financial aide. I’ve just recently upped my income and am lucky I get to pay as I go.
I really hate the people who just scream “you should have saved”. It’s such an elitist attitude and it’s out of touch with reality.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nobody in their right mind thinks college cost increases over the past 25 years are not exorbitant.
and congress wants to put a cap on nurses pay, come on let's put some regulations around college costs.
I don’t disagree with you, at all. But I still don’t believe there’s any such thing as a donut hole family.
Anybody making $150K HHI will not qualify for aid, so explain to me how a family of 4 saves $400K to pay for college?
Assuming they make $70K HHI at 30 and by the time they are 45 they make $150K
By making it their top priority and living modestly in every other possible way. If they don’t want to do that, they can use publics.
Can you write out the budget for me?
Anonymous wrote:new poster here
Wow. I thought we were a "donut hole" family but I guess not.
What is a step below "donut hole" called? We make too much to qualify for aid, but paying for an expensive school would involve far more than "liquidating assets." It would be more like taking on a second full time job, skipping at least one meal a day, absolutely zero entertainment budget (not even cable tv or netflix) etc.