Anonymous wrote:You need to read, watch unedited clips, and use non-biased sources. One cropped clip from a leaning source doesn't give the whole picture. Stop making lies about literate people being related, married, or friends of his. By IP address, this is a DMV site with DMV posters. Nobody is saying he was thinking with his brain and not his fear/emotion and he clearly made a mistake. It is infuriating that the world's most escalating and incompetent employees are being called "heros". Also victims, yes, but I don't see you putting your hard-earned money into hiring them.Anonymous wrote:
I mean seriously, are you related to him? This is such a weird take on the video. He came in like a raging lunatic. Nothing the minor children behind the counter said was going to make him calm down. He has at least one teen, he knows those kids are filming/taking pics of everything.
Plenty of us have kids with allergies and know the smoothie places are notorious for cross contamination. Restaurants based on blenders are no good for allergies. This was his mistake which HE needs to take responsibility for, not the girls behind the counter.
Anonymous wrote:You need to read, watch unedited clips, and use non-biased sources. One cropped clip from a leaning source doesn't give the whole picture. Stop making lies about literate people being related, married, or friends of his. By IP address, this is a DMV site with DMV posters. Nobody is saying he was thinking with his brain and not his fear/emotion and he clearly made a mistake. It is infuriating that the world's most escalating and incompetent employees are being called "heros". Also victims, yes, but I don't see you putting your hard-earned money into hiring them.Anonymous wrote:
I mean seriously, are you related to him? This is such a weird take on the video. He came in like a raging lunatic. Nothing the minor children behind the counter said was going to make him calm down. He has at least one teen, he knows those kids are filming/taking pics of everything.
Plenty of us have kids with allergies and know the smoothie places are notorious for cross contamination. Restaurants based on blenders are no good for allergies. This was his mistake which HE needs to take responsibility for, not the girls behind the counter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Ok, the guy is an asshat, probably a negligent father who relies on wife for everything related to parental duties and did not specify peanut allergy. But he did say no peanut butter, so why was peanut butter in it? Why isn't anyone talking about that? The girl who did the interview is not 100% sure if peanut butter was added or if there was cross contamination. So, obviously someone made a mistake and shouldn't the smoothie place be responsible for this? His teen could have died.
And to people who think the kids went through trauma because of this incident, you need a thicker hide then. The girls defended themselves quite well and they did not experience trauma.
What makes you say that "obviously someone made a mistake" just because the smoothie shop girl isn't prepared to swear 100 percent? As has been said a million times, an allergy parent should *never* give their child anything made in a fast food joint where they use peanut butter and nuts all the time. The mistake was on the dad, and maybe even on the 17-year-old child, who surely should know how to protect himself by now. One of my child's best friends has a peanut allergy and he was advocating for himself back when he was 4 years old.
Also, if you think the girls should toughen up and get a thicker skin if a customer is angry at their possible error, then that goes triple for the a-hole who lost his job because of his mistakes.
I meant the girls defended themselves well and did not look like they suffered trauma by this. The people saying that the girls experienced trauma are snowflakes.
The girls also did not de-escalate. They were rude and arrogant with a don't care attitude, when a customer who was angry that their son may have been killed as a result of their negligence, was confronting them. A "sorry sir, you need to talk to management" was the response needed there.
The way this guy went about it was all wrong. He needed to save that smoothie, get it tested and sue that establishment. Instead he went back from the hospital and vented out his anger and now is out of a job. His kid is 17 and the dad is in the news for this. I feel bad for the kid and also don't think someone needs their life ruined over a bad judgement. Those kids were no saints and they were sassy and not taking responsibility for their mistake and apologizing, further goading this man.
How would you all feel if someone who almost caused your son to die due to their negligence acted like it was no big deal? He was pushed over the edge and then his racist side came out and now he has no job.
They are not responsible for his behavior. Say it again and internalize it. He made the decision to come into the store screaming and making no effort to have a rational discussion. Stop trying to make excuses for him as if he isn't a grown-a$s adult who is responsible for his own behavior. I am HAPPY he got humiliated and fired. He went ape-shizz on a bunch of minimum wage GIRLS and wound up showing world he is an out of control bully.
I do feel bad for his child and I am happy that he has recovered.
I agree with everything except that the GIRLS part isn't relevant. How would it be any better if he raged at young boys? We can't raise our daughters to be equals and then in the same breath tell them they should expect to be treated differently because they are girls/women. We are either equal or we're not.
Anonymous wrote:You need to read, watch unedited clips, and use non-biased sources. One cropped clip from a leaning source doesn't give the whole picture. Stop making lies about literate people being related, married, or friends of his. By IP address, this is a DMV site with DMV posters. Nobody is saying he was thinking with his brain and not his fear/emotion and he clearly made a mistake. It is infuriating that the world's most escalating and incompetent employees are being called "heros". Also victims, yes, but I don't see you putting your hard-earned money into hiring them.Anonymous wrote:
I mean seriously, are you related to him? This is such a weird take on the video. He came in like a raging lunatic. Nothing the minor children behind the counter said was going to make him calm down. He has at least one teen, he knows those kids are filming/taking pics of everything.
Plenty of us have kids with allergies and know the smoothie places are notorious for cross contamination. Restaurants based on blenders are no good for allergies. This was his mistake which HE needs to take responsibility for, not the girls behind the counter.
You need to read, watch unedited clips, and use non-biased sources. One cropped clip from a leaning source doesn't give the whole picture. Stop making lies about literate people being related, married, or friends of his. By IP address, this is a DMV site with DMV posters. Nobody is saying he was thinking with his brain and not his fear/emotion and he clearly made a mistake. It is infuriating that the world's most escalating and incompetent employees are being called "heros". Also victims, yes, but I don't see you putting your hard-earned money into hiring them.Anonymous wrote:
I mean seriously, are you related to him? This is such a weird take on the video. He came in like a raging lunatic. Nothing the minor children behind the counter said was going to make him calm down. He has at least one teen, he knows those kids are filming/taking pics of everything.
Plenty of us have kids with allergies and know the smoothie places are notorious for cross contamination. Restaurants based on blenders are no good for allergies. This was his mistake which HE needs to take responsibility for, not the girls behind the counter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Ok, the guy is an asshat, probably a negligent father who relies on wife for everything related to parental duties and did not specify peanut allergy. But he did say no peanut butter, so why was peanut butter in it? Why isn't anyone talking about that? The girl who did the interview is not 100% sure if peanut butter was added or if there was cross contamination. So, obviously someone made a mistake and shouldn't the smoothie place be responsible for this? His teen could have died.
And to people who think the kids went through trauma because of this incident, you need a thicker hide then. The girls defended themselves quite well and they did not experience trauma.
What makes you say that "obviously someone made a mistake" just because the smoothie shop girl isn't prepared to swear 100 percent? As has been said a million times, an allergy parent should *never* give their child anything made in a fast food joint where they use peanut butter and nuts all the time. The mistake was on the dad, and maybe even on the 17-year-old child, who surely should know how to protect himself by now. One of my child's best friends has a peanut allergy and he was advocating for himself back when he was 4 years old.
Also, if you think the girls should toughen up and get a thicker skin if a customer is angry at their possible error, then that goes triple for the a-hole who lost his job because of his mistakes.
I meant the girls defended themselves well and did not look like they suffered trauma by this. The people saying that the girls experienced trauma are snowflakes.
The girls also did not de-escalate. They were rude and arrogant with a don't care attitude, when a customer who was angry that their son may have been killed as a result of their negligence, was confronting them. A "sorry sir, you need to talk to management" was the response needed there.
The way this guy went about it was all wrong. He needed to save that smoothie, get it tested and sue that establishment. Instead he went back from the hospital and vented out his anger and now is out of a job. His kid is 17 and the dad is in the news for this. I feel bad for the kid and also don't think someone needs their life ruined over a bad judgement. Those kids were no saints and they were sassy and not taking responsibility for their mistake and apologizing, further goading this man.
How would you all feel if someone who almost caused your son to die due to their negligence acted like it was no big deal? He was pushed over the edge and then his racist side came out and now he has no job.
They are not responsible for his behavior. Say it again and internalize it. He made the decision to come into the store screaming and making no effort to have a rational discussion. Stop trying to make excuses for him as if he isn't a grown-a$s adult who is responsible for his own behavior. I am HAPPY he got humiliated and fired. He went ape-shizz on a bunch of minimum wage GIRLS and wound up showing world he is an out of control bully.
I do feel bad for his child and I am happy that he has recovered.
Anonymous wrote:And I am a parent of a girl. If my DD made a mistake that could have caused someone's life, I would hope I raised her well enough to show some concern and not be flippant about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Ok, the guy is an asshat, probably a negligent father who relies on wife for everything related to parental duties and did not specify peanut allergy. But he did say no peanut butter, so why was peanut butter in it? Why isn't anyone talking about that? The girl who did the interview is not 100% sure if peanut butter was added or if there was cross contamination. So, obviously someone made a mistake and shouldn't the smoothie place be responsible for this? His teen could have died.
And to people who think the kids went through trauma because of this incident, you need a thicker hide then. The girls defended themselves quite well and they did not experience trauma.
What makes you say that "obviously someone made a mistake" just because the smoothie shop girl isn't prepared to swear 100 percent? As has been said a million times, an allergy parent should *never* give their child anything made in a fast food joint where they use peanut butter and nuts all the time. The mistake was on the dad, and maybe even on the 17-year-old child, who surely should know how to protect himself by now. One of my child's best friends has a peanut allergy and he was advocating for himself back when he was 4 years old.
Also, if you think the girls should toughen up and get a thicker skin if a customer is angry at their possible error, then that goes triple for the a-hole who lost his job because of his mistakes.
I meant the girls defended themselves well and did not look like they suffered trauma by this. The people saying that the girls experienced trauma are snowflakes.
The girls also did not de-escalate. They were rude and arrogant with a don't care attitude, when a customer who was angry that their son may have been killed as a result of their negligence, was confronting them. A "sorry sir, you need to talk to management" was the response needed there.
The way this guy went about it was all wrong. He needed to save that smoothie, get it tested and sue that establishment. Instead he went back from the hospital and vented out his anger and now is out of a job. His kid is 17 and the dad is in the news for this. I feel bad for the kid and also don't think someone needs their life ruined over a bad judgement. Those kids were no saints and they were sassy and not taking responsibility for their mistake and apologizing, further goading this man.
How would you all feel if someone who almost caused your son to die due to their negligence acted like it was no big deal? He was pushed over the edge and then his racist side came out and now he has no job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Ok, the guy is an asshat, probably a negligent father who relies on wife for everything related to parental duties and did not specify peanut allergy. But he did say no peanut butter, so why was peanut butter in it? Why isn't anyone talking about that? The girl who did the interview is not 100% sure if peanut butter was added or if there was cross contamination. So, obviously someone made a mistake and shouldn't the smoothie place be responsible for this? His teen could have died.
And to people who think the kids went through trauma because of this incident, you need a thicker hide then. The girls defended themselves quite well and they did not experience trauma.
What makes you say that "obviously someone made a mistake" just because the smoothie shop girl isn't prepared to swear 100 percent? As has been said a million times, an allergy parent should *never* give their child anything made in a fast food joint where they use peanut butter and nuts all the time. The mistake was on the dad, and maybe even on the 17-year-old child, who surely should know how to protect himself by now. One of my child's best friends has a peanut allergy and he was advocating for himself back when he was 4 years old.
Also, if you think the girls should toughen up and get a thicker skin if a customer is angry at their possible error, then that goes triple for the a-hole who lost his job because of his mistakes.
I meant the girls defended themselves well and did not look like they suffered trauma by this. The people saying that the girls experienced trauma are snowflakes.
The girls also did not de-escalate. They were rude and arrogant with a don't care attitude, when a customer who was angry that their son may have been killed as a result of their negligence, was confronting them. A "sorry sir, you need to talk to management" was the response needed there.
The way this guy went about it was all wrong. He needed to save that smoothie, get it tested and sue that establishment. Instead he went back from the hospital and vented out his anger and now is out of a job. His kid is 17 and the dad is in the news for this. I feel bad for the kid and also don't think someone needs their life ruined over a bad judgement. Those kids were no saints and they were sassy and not taking responsibility for their mistake and apologizing, further goading this man.
How would you all feel if someone who almost caused your son to die due to their negligence acted like it was no big deal? He was pushed over the edge and then his racist side came out and now he has no job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Ok, the guy is an asshat, probably a negligent father who relies on wife for everything related to parental duties and did not specify peanut allergy. But he did say no peanut butter, so why was peanut butter in it? Why isn't anyone talking about that? The girl who did the interview is not 100% sure if peanut butter was added or if there was cross contamination. So, obviously someone made a mistake and shouldn't the smoothie place be responsible for this? His teen could have died.
And to people who think the kids went through trauma because of this incident, you need a thicker hide then. The girls defended themselves quite well and they did not experience trauma.
What makes you say that "obviously someone made a mistake" just because the smoothie shop girl isn't prepared to swear 100 percent? As has been said a million times, an allergy parent should *never* give their child anything made in a fast food joint where they use peanut butter and nuts all the time. The mistake was on the dad, and maybe even on the 17-year-old child, who surely should know how to protect himself by now. One of my child's best friends has a peanut allergy and he was advocating for himself back when he was 4 years old.
Also, if you think the girls should toughen up and get a thicker skin if a customer is angry at their possible error, then that goes triple for the a-hole who lost his job because of his mistakes.
I meant the girls defended themselves well and did not look like they suffered trauma by this. The people saying that the girls experienced trauma are snowflakes.
The girls also did not de-escalate. They were rude and arrogant with a don't care attitude, when a customer who was angry that their son may have been killed as a result of their negligence, was confronting them. A "sorry sir, you need to talk to management" was the response needed there.
The way this guy went about it was all wrong. He needed to save that smoothie, get it tested and sue that establishment. Instead he went back from the hospital and vented out his anger and now is out of a job. His kid is 17 and the dad is in the news for this. I feel bad for the kid and also don't think someone needs their life ruined over a bad judgement. Those kids were no saints and they were sassy and not taking responsibility for their mistake and apologizing, further goading this man.
How would you all feel if someone who almost caused your son to die due to their negligence acted like it was no big deal? He was pushed over the edge and then his racist side came out and now he has no job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Ok, the guy is an asshat, probably a negligent father who relies on wife for everything related to parental duties and did not specify peanut allergy. But he did say no peanut butter, so why was peanut butter in it? Why isn't anyone talking about that? The girl who did the interview is not 100% sure if peanut butter was added or if there was cross contamination. So, obviously someone made a mistake and shouldn't the smoothie place be responsible for this? His teen could have died.
And to people who think the kids went through trauma because of this incident, you need a thicker hide then. The girls defended themselves quite well and they did not experience trauma.
What makes you say that "obviously someone made a mistake" just because the smoothie shop girl isn't prepared to swear 100 percent? As has been said a million times, an allergy parent should *never* give their child anything made in a fast food joint where they use peanut butter and nuts all the time. The mistake was on the dad, and maybe even on the 17-year-old child, who surely should know how to protect himself by now. One of my child's best friends has a peanut allergy and he was advocating for himself back when he was 4 years old.
Also, if you think the girls should toughen up and get a thicker skin if a customer is angry at their possible error, then that goes triple for the a-hole who lost his job because of his mistakes.
I meant the girls defended themselves well and did not look like they suffered trauma by this. The people saying that the girls experienced trauma are snowflakes.
The girls also did not de-escalate. They were rude and arrogant with a don't care attitude, when a customer who was angry that their son may have been killed as a result of their negligence, was confronting them. A "sorry sir, you need to talk to management" was the response needed there.
The way this guy went about it was all wrong. He needed to save that smoothie, get it tested and sue that establishment. Instead he went back from the hospital and vented out his anger and now is out of a job. His kid is 17 and the dad is in the news for this. I feel bad for the kid and also don't think someone needs their life ruined over a bad judgement. Those kids were no saints and they were sassy and not taking responsibility for their mistake and apologizing, further goading this man.
How would you all feel if someone who almost caused your son to die due to their negligence acted like it was no big deal? He was pushed over the edge and then his racist side came out and now he has no job.
Anonymous wrote:And I am a parent of a girl. If my DD made a mistake that could have caused someone's life, I would hope I raised her well enough to show some concern and not be flippant about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP. Ok, the guy is an asshat, probably a negligent father who relies on wife for everything related to parental duties and did not specify peanut allergy. But he did say no peanut butter, so why was peanut butter in it? Why isn't anyone talking about that? The girl who did the interview is not 100% sure if peanut butter was added or if there was cross contamination. So, obviously someone made a mistake and shouldn't the smoothie place be responsible for this? His teen could have died.
And to people who think the kids went through trauma because of this incident, you need a thicker hide then. The girls defended themselves quite well and they did not experience trauma.
What makes you say that "obviously someone made a mistake" just because the smoothie shop girl isn't prepared to swear 100 percent? As has been said a million times, an allergy parent should *never* give their child anything made in a fast food joint where they use peanut butter and nuts all the time. The mistake was on the dad, and maybe even on the 17-year-old child, who surely should know how to protect himself by now. One of my child's best friends has a peanut allergy and he was advocating for himself back when he was 4 years old.
Also, if you think the girls should toughen up and get a thicker skin if a customer is angry at their possible error, then that goes triple for the a-hole who lost his job because of his mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:PP here. The kids made a mistake, he made one. But now he is out of a job and that will affect his family. Not condoning his behavior but I kind of feel sorry that people get fired and their life gets ruined over an incident like this.