Anonymous wrote:Oh my god, everyone (at least in recent pages of this thread) needs to read up on how criminal justice actually works in DC. Karl Racine doesn't have any prosecutors (except in the loosest sense related to juvenile crimes). The federal government, specifically the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, is responsible for prosecuting all felonies (i.e., crimes punishable by more than one year in jail) in D.C. Our prosecutor-in-chief is the U.S. Attorney, a man named Matthew Graves. The disconnect between the police and the prosecutors, unique in our country, is a problem, but it's hardly one you can blame Bowser or Contee for when it was imposed on us by Congress.
Anonymous wrote:That time the criminals convinced people if you didn’t have cops, they would commit less crime😂 The country now has a serious case of GFS - ghetto fatigue syndrome. Nov won’t be pretty.
Anonymous wrote:The question is, where is the prevention work that Bowser should be doing with city agencies and if it is being done, can we conclude it doesn’t work? Bowser seems to conclude that prevention does not work because she now says she wants to lock them up. But she’s has been very passive about crime during her entire tenure, probably because she inherited a low crime situation and does realize or understand what leadership she needs to bring to the table. She also just wants to pass the buck.
The other question is why isn’t Contee positioning more officers in plainclothes, undercover, working with informants, etc to target these criminals? This is what bothers me the most, because Bowser is good at making excuses and her chief excuse over and over is that these criminals are from Maryland. But the vast majority are not. I saw some study that the vast majority of crimes in DC are committed by people with live within a one mile radius of each other. That should actually make early intervention, deterrence and investigations easier. And yet…
I get that the council passed these laws for juvenile offenders. But what I don’t see is the connection between that and city government and MPD failures. All I see is finger pointing and it bodes ill for the future.
Anonymous wrote:One of our "unhoused" drew 150 swastikas in Union Station but gets less press than a DCPS high schooler accused of making racist statements on Facebook.
https://wtop.com/dc/2022/01/dc-police-arrest-suspect-for-swastika-vandalism-at-union-station/
Anonymous wrote:One of our "unhoused" drew 150 swastikas in Union Station but gets less press than a DCPS high schooler accused of making racist statements on Facebook.
https://wtop.com/dc/2022/01/dc-police-arrest-suspect-for-swastika-vandalism-at-union-station/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The question is, where is the prevention work that Bowser should be doing with city agencies and if it is being done, can we conclude it doesn’t work? Bowser seems to conclude that prevention does not work because she now says she wants to lock them up. But she’s has been very passive about crime during her entire tenure, probably because she inherited a low crime situation and does realize or understand what leadership she needs to bring to the table. She also just wants to pass the buck.
The other question is why isn’t Contee positioning more officers in plainclothes, undercover, working with informants, etc to target these criminals? This is what bothers me the most, because Bowser is good at making excuses and her chief excuse over and over is that these criminals are from Maryland. But the vast majority are not. I saw some study that the vast majority of crimes in DC are committed by people with live within a one mile radius of each other. That should actually make early intervention, deterrence and investigations easier. And yet…
I get that the council passed these laws for juvenile offenders. But what I don’t see is the connection between that and city government and MPD failures. All I see is finger pointing and it bodes ill for the future.
I am not a fan of Bowser, esp. densification. However, the city offers a TON of services. The one failing is that she has pushed ending homelessness and placement, but city agencies MUST monitor and provide services to "the placed"-and no one sees that being done. So yes, she needs to address that.
Once a crime has been committed, it's out of her hands and up to the Council and the AG. The Council has been weakening criminal penalties, but not increasing rehabiltative serviecs, so they basically suck. They have also attempted great and succeeded in some defunding of police. She has spoken out against all these measures to weaken policing. The AG dismisses gun crimes on the reg, and the police chief and Bowser have spoken out against this. For an anti-gun city, the AG office dismiss way too many gun charges by actual criminals.
As to officers in plainsclothes--LOL, the police aren't allowed to do ANYTHING to "target" criminals and none of the cameras in DC work for anything but tickets. As to that, the tickets are not being paid by MD + VA residents anyway and we are making no attempt to collect or boot out of staters. The Council AND Mayor need to address this.
Anonymous wrote:The question is, where is the prevention work that Bowser should be doing with city agencies and if it is being done, can we conclude it doesn’t work? Bowser seems to conclude that prevention does not work because she now says she wants to lock them up. But she’s has been very passive about crime during her entire tenure, probably because she inherited a low crime situation and does realize or understand what leadership she needs to bring to the table. She also just wants to pass the buck.
The other question is why isn’t Contee positioning more officers in plainclothes, undercover, working with informants, etc to target these criminals? This is what bothers me the most, because Bowser is good at making excuses and her chief excuse over and over is that these criminals are from Maryland. But the vast majority are not. I saw some study that the vast majority of crimes in DC are committed by people with live within a one mile radius of each other. That should actually make early intervention, deterrence and investigations easier. And yet…
I get that the council passed these laws for juvenile offenders. But what I don’t see is the connection between that and city government and MPD failures. All I see is finger pointing and it bodes ill for the future.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Violent assault https://twitter.com/alanhenney/status/1487263424799293442?s=21
And an armed robbery
https://twitter.com/alanhenney/status/1487261307153825803?s=21
At this point even I’m thinking about running against Allen.
A lot of people would contribute from other wards to ANYONE who is the opposite of Allen. Hammurabi would amass a war chest at this point.
The loony crime policies of some of our DC Councilmembers don't just affect their wards. Apparently further softening of youth crime accountability is being pushed through by Allen. Silverman and their ilk RIGHT NOW for vote this spring.
I’m curious how much responsibility Bowser should take. Both her and Contee point their fingers at the council but certainly have much more actual power to do something about it.
Its pathetic that the entire city government is pointing fingers instead of and in preference to coming together to tackle this problem that should be their highest priority.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Violent assault https://twitter.com/alanhenney/status/1487263424799293442?s=21
And an armed robbery
https://twitter.com/alanhenney/status/1487261307153825803?s=21
At this point even I’m thinking about running against Allen.
A lot of people would contribute from other wards to ANYONE who is the opposite of Allen. Hammurabi would amass a war chest at this point.
The loony crime policies of some of our DC Councilmembers don't just affect their wards. Apparently further softening of youth crime accountability is being pushed through by Allen. Silverman and their ilk RIGHT NOW for vote this spring.