Anonymous wrote:Oh no a core line of attack derailed! https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/16/politics/fact-check-trump-walz-minnesota-schools-tampons/index.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?
That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.
You are going to lose your mind when you find out about the other side
The guy misspoke like 2 times in his 60 years. The other guy lied 120+ times in 60 minutes. But noooo, Walz is the liar. They can just save the outrage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?
That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.
You are going to lose your mind when you find out about the other side
The guy misspoke like 2 times in his 60 years. The other guy lied 120+ times in 60 minutes. But noooo, Walz is the liar. They can just save the outrage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just watched the Harris/Walz interview and I love him more now.
They’re both such good, normal people.
They’re being so polite about each other’s music choices 😂 It reminds me of talking to my dad
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?
That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.
You are going to lose your mind when you find out about the other side
The guy misspoke like 2 times in his 60 years. The other guy lied 120+ times in 60 minutes. But noooo, Walz is the liar. They can just save the outrage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just watched the Harris/Walz interview and I love him more now.
They’re both such good, normal people.
Anonymous wrote:Just watched the Harris/Walz interview and I love him more now.
Anonymous wrote:Jesus. Let it go, you hyper-focused loons. These are the socially awkward weirdos who show up at parties and don't know how to talk to anyone - keep diverting the conversation so they can talk about trains or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?
That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.
You are going to lose your mind when you find out about the other side
Anonymous wrote:I don’t care if Walz served 10 years or 50 years in the military. His record was fine as it was— why did he feel the need to embellish?
That’s the part that bothers— the resume padding and lack of full honesty.
Anonymous wrote:Just watched the Harris/Walz interview and I love him more now.