Anonymous wrote:
Meanwhile that still does not solve the problem you have with being in the same boat with the nutty folks who oppose Common Core because they think it's going to turn their kids into gay Muslims.
So, I present valid complaints about Common Core, but you return to politics.
Sorry, I am basing my opinions on education, training, and experience. I am not going to change my principles just because you think it is about politics.
You put yourself in the same boat with the "nutty people" when you support Common Core because of your politics. It is clear now that is why you support it.
Anonymous wrote:It is a fact that politics is a major component of opposition to the Common Core standards. It may not be why you, personally, oppose the Common Core standards. But there are many opponents of the Common Core standards who are not you. And many of these opponents oppose the Common Core standards because of politics.
I notice that you are returning to politics instead of replying to my issue: There were not any Early Childhood teachers on the committee and the standards reflect that.
That is not a political issue.
It is a fact that politics is a major component of opposition to the Common Core standards. It may not be why you, personally, oppose the Common Core standards. But there are many opponents of the Common Core standards who are not you. And many of these opponents oppose the Common Core standards because of politics.
Anonymous wrote:
Meanwhile that still does not solve the problem you have with being in the same boat with the nutty folks who oppose Common Core because they think it's going to turn their kids into gay Muslims.
So, I present valid complaints about Common Core, but you return to politics.
Sorry, I am basing my opinions on education, training, and experience. I am not going to change my principles just because you think it is about politics.
You put yourself in the same boat with the "nutty people" when you support Common Core because of your politics. It is clear now that is why you support it.
Anonymous wrote:
Meanwhile that still does not solve the problem you have with being in the same boat with the nutty folks who oppose Common Core because they think it's going to turn their kids into gay Muslims.
So, I present valid complaints about Common Core, but you return to politics.
Sorry, I am basing my opinions on education, training, and experience. I am not going to change my principles just because you think it is about politics.
You put yourself in the same boat with the "nutty people" when you support Common Core because of your politics. It is clear now that is why you support it.
Meanwhile that still does not solve the problem you have with being in the same boat with the nutty folks who oppose Common Core because they think it's going to turn their kids into gay Muslims.
Meanwhile that still does not solve the problem you have with being in the same boat with the nutty folks who oppose Common Core because they think it's going to turn their kids into gay Muslims.
Anonymous wrote:There are many reasons to oppose Common core. If you support it --just because people you disagree with politically oppose it--that is not a very good reason.
I oppose it because a number of the standards in Kindergarten and first. Ii find it disturbing that there were no early childhood teachers on the committee and I question the process. CC is doubling down on pushing too many academics in K. That is not political.
It seems to me that some people support CC simply because Tea Party members are against it. There have been plenty of comments on this thread against CC that have nothing to do with politics. Any time those comments come up, the pro CC poster returns to politics. If you will notice, there were a couple of standards posted recently that were pretty vague and ambiguous. So, we go back to politics.
Anonymous wrote:Whether one wants to admit it's politically motivated or not, it's evident that the anti-CCers aren't out there calling out all of the disinformation that definitely is politically motivated that's coming from within their own ranks regardless of "what aisle." That ends up hurting anti-CC credibility.
Please translate into plain English. What does this sentence even mean?
Isn't that trawling?
Please translate into plain English. What does this sentence even mean?