Anonymous wrote:

🚨GA Senate hearing on Fani Willis-

Ashleigh Merchant is incredible. Listen to how she learned Wade and Willis were actually having a romantic relationship. Bradley spilled the tea. And don’t skip the end about the publicly funded media monitoring and brand management. Brand. Unbelievable

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here in DC, we are unhappy that the DA is not prosecuting criminals. Over in Atlanta, you're unhappy that your DA is prosecuting criminals? Wow.

She should be prosecuting real criminals not fawny criminals.

Have you SEEN her track record? The whole of Georgia sleeps more safely because of her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here in DC, we are unhappy that the DA is not prosecuting criminals. Over in Atlanta, you're unhappy that your DA is prosecuting criminals? Wow.

She should be prosecuting real criminals not fawny criminals.

Anonymous wrote:Here in DC, we are unhappy that the DA is not prosecuting criminals. Over in Atlanta, you're unhappy that your DA is prosecuting criminals? Wow.

Anonymous wrote:I watch most of Ashleigh's testimony yesterday. This is a good recap. She had documentation supporting every one of her responses.

https://peachpundit.com/2024/03/06/top-6-takeaways-from-ashleigh-merchants-senate-testimony/

Anonymous wrote:Fannie and Nathan may be charged with interfering with elections by conspiring with others (WH/VP) under Georgia RICO statute.

How ironic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fanny is so done. GA wants to enact "Fanny Law" to prevent extreme corruption by local rogue DAs.

She will live in infamy.

Kind of like Trump, a traitor so vile he worked with Russia throughout his time in office, stole top secret documents, attempted multiple ways to overturn the election and then attempted to overthrow the government.

Goodness. Still going with the Russia thing, are we?

Anonymous wrote:Fannie and Nathan may be charged with interfering with elections by conspiring with others (WH/VP) under Georgia RICO statute.

How ironic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Yeah. I'm not believing the sexual harassment allegations story.

Turns out there is a bigger reason Bradley may have left the firm. When your "partner" and friend is hiding money in accounts (that he shouldn't be using for that purpose), there is a good reason to leave.

Nathan Wade accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in payments and hid the money from his ex-wife. Merchant claimed that Wade had begun depositing his earnings from the RICO case into a solo IOLTA account, separate from his partners. As evidence she pointed to canceled checks from Fulton County which were deposited into that account. IOLTA stands for “Interest on Lawyers’ Trust Accounts,” and are used to hold money that belongs to clients and cannot be used for their operating expenses. Merchant pointed out that Wade parked a huge amount of money into that IOLTA account and then in his divorce proceedings claimed to only be making a couple thousand dollars per month when records show he was earning $35,000 per month.

https://peachpundit.com/2024/03/06/top-6-takeaways-from-ashleigh-merchants-senate-testimony/

Oh? Now you're saying that Bradley wasn't kicked out of his law firm for bad behavior but instead was kicked out of his law firm because his partner had a contentious divorce? That makes sense to you?

What kind of strange world do you people live in, that an office affair is a conflict of interest and that getting fired is actually code for - something else?

Some people think morals matter and stand by their word; others don't.

Morals? Did your fingers burn when you typed that?

An office affair is sordid. Interfering in an election is undemocratic and illegal as well as immoral and unethical.