Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is actually pretty encouraging for the Democrats. He won the PV by approximately 2.5 million. Given where we are as a country, how many votes to the Democrats pick up by doing nothing else besides running a white male? By running on the Republican's failures instead of having to defend theirs? How many do the Republicans lose by not running their cult leader? Of course this will disproportionally have to roll down to the swing states...but when you step back from coloring in the counties red/blue, that's not a durable-looking mandate.

I'm not convinced he actually won. I so wish Harris hadn't conceded right away.



But I agree that Democrats should not freak out thinking we need to reinvent the wheel.

Even the legal immigrants voted for Trump lol. He won by a landslide and secured the battleground states. Now he has a Trifecta with the house and senate...


Same

Yes.

Yes keep moving the trans dei and illegal immigrants need to vote ideas it will help you the next time

He won by a landslide. And the legal immigrants voted for Trump!

The final results as they are coming in, is nothing close to a landslide. Not by percentage vote, not by electoral college, no metric suggests it.

what do you define as a landslide 😂

the popular vote was basically 50/50.

Trump didn’t win the popular vote in 2016 or 2020. You know bc he really isn’t popular with the majority of the country.

Trump's approval rating will fall back to the normal Trump/Biden level of 35% to 40% after a few months in office because that's the best approval rating piss poor leaders can maintain. Trump is already very unpopular with 98% of our Congress men and women and any other potential cabinet members of high integrity because the Mattis/Tillerson types refuse to work with Trump after Trump exposed his lack of integrity during his first term (this is the reason his staff appointments have been so bizarre- he simply can't get anyone else to agree to accept an appointment). Maybe in 2028 we'll find the real POTUS we've been missing since 2017.

I will never believe that musk did not have some part in this. He knew way too much way too early on and the count was way too clean by what 8:00 p.m. Central? Even though every projection had it neck and neck and we may not know for days.... Interesting that Trump won in all of the swing states, yet Republicans didn't sweep either state.

Anonymous wrote:Dems always seem to win two weeks later

Because they discover the steal.

Anonymous wrote:Dems always seem to win two weeks later

That’s when they start counting the “custom” ballots.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is actually pretty encouraging for the Democrats. He won the PV by approximately 2.5 million. Given where we are as a country, how many votes to the Democrats pick up by doing nothing else besides running a white male? By running on the Republican's failures instead of having to defend theirs? How many do the Republicans lose by not running their cult leader? Of course this will disproportionally have to roll down to the swing states...but when you step back from coloring in the counties red/blue, that's not a durable-looking mandate.

I'm not convinced he actually won. I so wish Harris hadn't conceded right away.



But I agree that Democrats should not freak out thinking we need to reinvent the wheel.

Even the legal immigrants voted for Trump lol. He won by a landslide and secured the battleground states. Now he has a Trifecta with the house and senate...


Same

Yes.

Yes keep moving the trans dei and illegal immigrants need to vote ideas it will help you the next time

He won by a landslide. And the legal immigrants voted for Trump!

The final results as they are coming in, is nothing close to a landslide. Not by percentage vote, not by electoral college, no metric suggests it.

what do you define as a landslide 😂

the popular vote was basically 50/50.

Trump didn’t win the popular vote in 2016 or 2020. You know bc he really isn’t popular with the majority of the country.

Dems always seem to win two weeks later

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is actually pretty encouraging for the Democrats. He won the PV by approximately 2.5 million. Given where we are as a country, how many votes to the Democrats pick up by doing nothing else besides running a white male? By running on the Republican's failures instead of having to defend theirs? How many do the Republicans lose by not running their cult leader? Of course this will disproportionally have to roll down to the swing states...but when you step back from coloring in the counties red/blue, that's not a durable-looking mandate.

I'm not convinced he actually won. I so wish Harris hadn't conceded right away.



But I agree that Democrats should not freak out thinking we need to reinvent the wheel.

Even the legal immigrants voted for Trump lol. He won by a landslide and secured the battleground states. Now he has a Trifecta with the house and senate...


Same

Yes.

Yes keep moving the trans dei and illegal immigrants need to vote ideas it will help you the next time

He won by a landslide. And the legal immigrants voted for Trump!

The final results as they are coming in, is nothing close to a landslide. Not by percentage vote, not by electoral college, no metric suggests it.

Not to mention Trump won a Trifecta with the house and senate.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is actually pretty encouraging for the Democrats. He won the PV by approximately 2.5 million. Given where we are as a country, how many votes to the Democrats pick up by doing nothing else besides running a white male? By running on the Republican's failures instead of having to defend theirs? How many do the Republicans lose by not running their cult leader? Of course this will disproportionally have to roll down to the swing states...but when you step back from coloring in the counties red/blue, that's not a durable-looking mandate.

I'm not convinced he actually won. I so wish Harris hadn't conceded right away.



But I agree that Democrats should not freak out thinking we need to reinvent the wheel.

Same

Yes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is actually pretty encouraging for the Democrats. He won the PV by approximately 2.5 million. Given where we are as a country, how many votes to the Democrats pick up by doing nothing else besides running a white male? By running on the Republican's failures instead of having to defend theirs? How many do the Republicans lose by not running their cult leader? Of course this will disproportionally have to roll down to the swing states...but when you step back from coloring in the counties red/blue, that's not a durable-looking mandate.

I'm not convinced he actually won. I so wish Harris hadn't conceded right away.



But I agree that Democrats should not freak out thinking we need to reinvent the wheel.

Same

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This happening while Harris lost and Casey is probably going to lose is crazy.

This is not crazy. Abortion is regulated at the state level so it makes perfect sense that people voted blue for their state but red for the president. The voter is always right.

I never doubt the wisdom of the electorate. There is a reason why Kamala lost. America made the right choice

The “wisdom” of the electorate???
Hahahaa. Many of them are imbeciles and educated at 7th grade level at best. Incapable of critical thinking and analysis. Misinformed by Faux News.

Don’t confuse education and intelligence. They’re completely different things.

This is so true. Kamala is well educated, but cannot think on her feet nor apply anything she's learned. We've all seen these people in life. And why Kamala can't withstand an interview or even an appearance like Oprah. She would be better suited in a large lecture hall at some university. Not running a country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is actually pretty encouraging for the Democrats. He won the PV by approximately 2.5 million. Given where we are as a country, how many votes to the Democrats pick up by doing nothing else besides running a white male? By running on the Republican's failures instead of having to defend theirs? How many do the Republicans lose by not running their cult leader? Of course this will disproportionally have to roll down to the swing states...but when you step back from coloring in the counties red/blue, that's not a durable-looking mandate.

I'm not convinced he actually won. I so wish Harris hadn't conceded right away.



But I agree that Democrats should not freak out thinking we need to reinvent the wheel.

Anonymous wrote:

This is actually pretty encouraging for the Democrats. He won the PV by approximately 2.5 million. Given where we are as a country, how many votes to the Democrats pick up by doing nothing else besides running a white male? By running on the Republican's failures instead of having to defend theirs? How many do the Republicans lose by not running their cult leader? Of course this will disproportionally have to roll down to the swing states...but when you step back from coloring in the counties red/blue, that's not a durable-looking mandate.

Anonymous wrote:Interesting:

But it has nothing to do with race or gender.