Anonymous wrote:There is not a single problem with education. There are multiple problems, both separate and interconnected. One of these problems, in some places, is low standards. Is it the biggest problem? I don't think so. But there is a complete unwillingness to address the problems that I consider the biggest problems. So people take what they can get.
And they had low standards because that was the best they could do. Will suddenly having higher standards make them do better? Not if everything else stays the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
There is not a single problem with education. There are multiple problems, both separate and interconnected. One of these problems, in some places, is low standards. Is it the biggest problem? I don't think so. But there is a complete unwillingness to address the problems that I consider the biggest problems. So people take what they can get.
This would be acceptable if you were getting something for your money, but you're not.
I disagree. I am getting something for my money. Plus the programs that I would want would actually cost a whole lot more money.
What are you getting that is of benefit?
Anonymous wrote:
There is not a single problem with education. There are multiple problems, both separate and interconnected. One of these problems, in some places, is low standards. Is it the biggest problem? I don't think so. But there is a complete unwillingness to address the problems that I consider the biggest problems. So people take what they can get.
This would be acceptable if you were getting something for your money, but you're not.
I disagree. I am getting something for my money. Plus the programs that I would want would actually cost a whole lot more money.
There is not a single problem with education. There are multiple problems, both separate and interconnected. One of these problems, in some places, is low standards. Is it the biggest problem? I don't think so. But there is a complete unwillingness to address the problems that I consider the biggest problems. So people take what they can get.
Anonymous wrote:There is not a single problem with education. There are multiple problems, both separate and interconnected. One of these problems, in some places, is low standards. Is it the biggest problem? I don't think so. But there is a complete unwillingness to address the problems that I consider the biggest problems. So people take what they can get.
This would be acceptable if you were getting something for your money, but you're not.
Anonymous wrote:
I'm a member of the general public and I understand them. So your point is what exactly?
Well, apparently PP didn't understand them and didn't think he/she needed to understand them.
And, I am to assume that you have not attended college?
There is not a single problem with education. There are multiple problems, both separate and interconnected. One of these problems, in some places, is low standards. Is it the biggest problem? I don't think so. But there is a complete unwillingness to address the problems that I consider the biggest problems. So people take what they can get.
Anonymous wrote:There is not a single problem with education. There are multiple problems, both separate and interconnected. One of these problems, in some places, is low standards. Is it the biggest problem? I don't think so. But there is a complete unwillingness to address the problems that I consider the biggest problems. So people take what they can get.
Pathetic.
One of these problems, in some places, is low standards.
Well, apparently PP didn't understand them and didn't think he/she needed to understand them.
And, I am to assume that you have not attended college?
There is not a single problem with education. There are multiple problems, both separate and interconnected. One of these problems, in some places, is low standards. Is it the biggest problem? I don't think so. But there is a complete unwillingness to address the problems that I consider the biggest problems. So people take what they can get.
I'm a member of the general public and I understand them. So your point is what exactly?
Anonymous wrote:
Yes, and?
A PP said that the standards did not need to be measurable and that the general public did not need to understand them--that only the "implementers" needed to understand them.
Yes, and?