Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YJMA is def held back by we know who.
No we don't.
We do. Club director has a real opportunity here but is not taking it seriously. Likely to go the way of Pride in 5 years.
As long as BLC doesn’t introduce high school–aged teams, Capital will continue to thrive. Both organizations benefit from one another and will likely continue to rely on that mutual support.
I think you missed this posters point. They said YJMA will go the way of Pride. This wasn't a post about BLC.
Interesting take on YJMA, but probably to be expected. Pride is sinking but it will always be a good place for rec kids to practice/learn a little more as a C club.
I think most of YJMA will stay put and the top girls won't be trying out for Capital.
That is what “they” say every year!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YJMA is def held back by we know who.
No we don't.
We do. Club director has a real opportunity here but is not taking it seriously. Likely to go the way of Pride in 5 years.
As long as BLC doesn’t introduce high school–aged teams, Capital will continue to thrive. Both organizations benefit from one another and will likely continue to rely on that mutual support.
I think you missed this posters point. They said YJMA will go the way of Pride. This wasn't a post about BLC.
Interesting take on YJMA, but probably to be expected. Pride is sinking but it will always be a good place for rec kids to practice/learn a little more as a C club.
I think most of YJMA will stay put and the top girls won't be trying out for Capital.
Funny. People said the same thing about M&D DC 2029s.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with Capital coaching? Asking for a friend.
you never know who you're going to get.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YJMA is def held back by we know who.
No we don't.
We do. Club director has a real opportunity here but is not taking it seriously. Likely to go the way of Pride in 5 years.
As long as BLC doesn’t introduce high school–aged teams, Capital will continue to thrive. Both organizations benefit from one another and will likely continue to rely on that mutual support.
I think you missed this posters point. They said YJMA will go the way of Pride. This wasn't a post about BLC.
Interesting take on YJMA, but probably to be expected. Pride is sinking but it will always be a good place for rec kids to practice/learn a little more as a C club.
I think most of YJMA will stay put and the top girls won't be trying out for Capital.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YJMA is def held back by we know who.
No we don't.
We do. Club director has a real opportunity here but is not taking it seriously. Likely to go the way of Pride in 5 years.
As long as BLC doesn’t introduce high school–aged teams, Capital will continue to thrive. Both organizations benefit from one another and will likely continue to rely on that mutual support.
I think you missed this posters point. They said YJMA will go the way of Pride. This wasn't a post about BLC.
Interesting take on YJMA, but probably to be expected. Pride is sinking but it will always be a good place for rec kids to practice/learn a little more as a C club.
I think most of YJMA will stay put and the top girls won't be trying out for Capital.
That is what “they” say every year!
Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with Capital coaching? Asking for a friend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YJMA is def held back by we know who.
No we don't.
We do. Club director has a real opportunity here but is not taking it seriously. Likely to go the way of Pride in 5 years.
As long as BLC doesn’t introduce high school–aged teams, Capital will continue to thrive. Both organizations benefit from one another and will likely continue to rely on that mutual support.
I think you missed this posters point. They said YJMA will go the way of Pride. This wasn't a post about BLC.
Interesting take on YJMA, but probably to be expected. Pride is sinking but it will always be a good place for rec kids to practice/learn a little more as a C club.
I think most of YJMA will stay put and the top girls won't be trying out for Capital.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YJMA is def held back by we know who.
No we don't.
We do. Club director has a real opportunity here but is not taking it seriously. Likely to go the way of Pride in 5 years.
As long as BLC doesn’t introduce high school–aged teams, Capital will continue to thrive. Both organizations benefit from one another and will likely continue to rely on that mutual support.
I think you missed this posters point. They said YJMA will go the way of Pride. This wasn't a post about BLC.
Interesting take on YJMA, but probably to be expected. Pride is sinking but it will always be a good place for rec kids to practice/learn a little more as a C club.
I think most of YJMA will stay put and the top girls won't be trying out for Capital.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:YJMA is def held back by we know who.
No we don't.
We do. Club director has a real opportunity here but is not taking it seriously. Likely to go the way of Pride in 5 years.
As long as BLC doesn’t introduce high school–aged teams, Capital will continue to thrive. Both organizations benefit from one another and will likely continue to rely on that mutual support.
I think you missed this posters point. They said YJMA will go the way of Pride. This wasn't a post about BLC.
Interesting take on YJMA, but probably to be expected. Pride is sinking but it will always be a good place for rec kids to practice/learn a little more as a C club.