Wow I did not realize McUnion or FXV Union was such a dumpster fire 🔥

This thread is not even entertaining anymore…please kill it

Anonymous wrote:The older girls was told to expect offers and such by Wednesday of this week.

First round of offers for the older girls went out last Thursday; second round by tomorrow. Rosters should be mostly set at that point.

Anonymous wrote:The older girls was told to expect offers and such by Wednesday of this week.

When will we see the roster on Playmetrics?

The older girls was told to expect offers and such by Wednesday of this week.

Anonymous wrote:Any offer out yet? asking for a friend

First rounds of offers have gone out for boys and girls. Second round for girls this week. Boys have more ID sessions after this week so offers should keep going out until ID sessions are done.

Any offer out yet? asking for a friend

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Any offer out today?

Some have only been able to make it to 1 of 2 ID sessions. There are 2 more sessions to go. With high school season it’s complicated. Other clubs sometimes want to see a player 3 times or more. Anyone can look good once.

The boys have two more sessions. The girls are done.

The FX Union girls ID sessions are not done. 2010s, 11s, ans 12s 2nd ID sessions are tomorrow.

FX Union boys have a total of 4 ID sessions in all age groups. Girls done after 2 (as pointed out above 2009 and older are done; 2012-10 done after tomorrow's session).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All things considered if the 2012 parents are the ones panicking... between Vienna [who got the sh$t end of the rain out], bryc and mclean... the u12 girls showed up at Jefferson cup. All were competing in different divisions. All appeared competitive. Take 4, 4, 4 and 4 outsiders/floaters and you've got a team

BRYC was in the bottom bracket of 9v9 (8 of 8) and VYS was in the bottom bracket of 11v11 (3 of 3). Not saying you can’t make a team out of that but a little misleading. This 2012 union team is going to struggle next year. The timing of the upheaval hurt with any new players and SYC was going to make up most of the team. Maybe they’ll get better with time.

Totally disagree on the last point. The 2012 McLean team was in the 2nd bracket and won 2/3 games, lost only to the winner who by all accounts was misbracketed, and they 2012s held their own. Take top 6 from that team, top 6 from Vienna (which performed well but had their second day cancelled), then the top 3-4 or so left from BRYC (because some of their tops have already gone elsewhere), then fill in with some outsiders, that’s a strong team. Even has SYC stayed, it wouldn’t have thrown off the numbers - maybe you take top 4-5 SYC instead of top 3-4 BRYC, shave 1 off the others, and still, there you are. It’s not that difficult to see why this works to make the teams more competitive, it just means more girls who would have been on the lower end of the roster will have to look to other options. That also may not be a bad thing if they are getting play time elsewhere.

Anonymous wrote:This thread is the clear winner of the 23-24 DMV soccer season.

Confirmed

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All things considered if the 2012 parents are the ones panicking... between Vienna [who got the sh$t end of the rain out], bryc and mclean... the u12 girls showed up at Jefferson cup. All were competing in different divisions. All appeared competitive. Take 4, 4, 4 and 4 outsiders/floaters and you've got a team

People (some) on this forum love to put down Valor. You do realize Valor was in higher bracket than BRYC? BRYC was in the lowest bracket for their age group. They did not win it. They sure SHOWED UP at Jefferson Cup.

WTF are you babbling about. Why would you inject Valor into this discussion? We get it, you are a Valor parent but let me give you a big social cue. You're not helping your clubs cause because you sound like a PIA to be around.