Anonymous wrote:My Top 10

1) Tigers
2) Rams
3) Bobcats
4) Warhawks
5) Patriots
6) Titans
7) Cougars
8) Saxons
9) Wolverines
10) Chargers

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where its at headed into the weekend:
Frontrunners
1) Indy - until they lose, they are the favorite, make any excuse you want, its an excuse
2) Robo - early season 1 goal loss to Madison, again early season, things have changed,

Next Tier
3) Battlefield - head to head W against Madison this week and L to Indy last week.
4) Madison - based on their showing against the above three head to head.

Outside looking in:
5) Cosby - they beat BF this weekend, they jump to 3 and the others fall a slot.

The field: A surprise could pop up in the playoffs and knock off any of these teams, but they will not get through 2 or 3 of them to the Championship.

How would Yorktown not be ahead of Cosby?

Yorktown has wins over Battlefield and Cosby. They are in the mix for sure

YT has wins over teams that are barely in the mix. Congrats! Not going anywhere, One trick pony with #3.

Anonymous wrote:Any guess for how the McLean YT game goes? I’m a WNL parent and I have never seen McLean play worse. If they play to their best ability, slightly better than the langley game, does anyone think they have a flying chance of making it close? I heard the BF game was close until the second half between the two? And also, how do you think liberty district will shake out?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe posting just to piss some people off, Yorkton's LaxNumbers' "SCHED" is 80.23. That's just a bit tougher than Independence's 79.36, much harder than Cosby's 77.77, just below but near to Battlefield's 80.49, above Langley and Oakton, but below Madison's and Robinson's identical 81.65.

But the LaxNumbers made up formulas say

Yeah, made up as anything and everything is made up. Maybe you have a better formula that would make more sense. Good luck coming up with your algorithm that is far better than the free website dedicated to 3000+ HS lax teams

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe posting just to piss some people off, Yorkton's LaxNumbers' "SCHED" is 80.23. That's just a bit tougher than Independence's 79.36, much harder than Cosby's 77.77, just below but near to Battlefield's 80.49, above Langley and Oakton, but below Madison's and Robinson's identical 81.65.

But the LaxNumbers made up formulas say

Yeah, made up as anything and everything is made up. Maybe you have a better formula that would make more sense. Good luck coming up with your algorithm that is far better than the free website dedicated to 3000+ HS lax teams

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe posting just to piss some people off, Yorkton's LaxNumbers' "SCHED" is 80.23. That's just a bit tougher than Independence's 79.36, much harder than Cosby's 77.77, just below but near to Battlefield's 80.49, above Langley and Oakton, but below Madison's and Robinson's identical 81.65.

But the LaxNumbers made up formulas say

Anonymous wrote:Maybe posting just to piss some people off, Yorkton's LaxNumbers' "SCHED" is 80.23. That's just a bit tougher than Independence's 79.36, much harder than Cosby's 77.77, just below but near to Battlefield's 80.49, above Langley and Oakton, but below Madison's and Robinson's identical 81.65.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are not multiple tiers for the teams mentioned above. They are all in tier 1 and any of them can win it all (including Yorktown)

Says the guy rooting for the team at the bottom of the list?

Funny you assume I am rooting for Yorktown. Just respect them as a contender, and teams that over look them will most likely lose.
Also, they clearly aren’t at the bottom of the list if you use any logic whatsoever

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are not multiple tiers for the teams mentioned above. They are all in tier 1 and any of them can win it all (including Yorktown)

Says the guy rooting for the team at the bottom of the list?