Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are mail in ballots an outstanding factor here?

I certainly hope so. I’m pretty despondent at the moment, but I’m still hoping they can find a couple hundred thousand more McAuliffe votes that they hadn’t noticed before.

Don’t worry, they will. That’s the Dim playbook and Stacey Abrams has been busy ensuring the pallet of back up ballets is ready to go.

Perfect example of how Youngkin voters believe Trump lies.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep an eye on my earlier Princess question though as the race continues to narrow.

What was your question? Genuinely asking..this thread has a lot of pages.

The PP thinks Blandings miserable 20,000 votes would have cancelled out Youngkin’s 80,000 vote lead lol.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep an eye on my earlier Princess question though as the race continues to narrow.

What was your question? Genuinely asking..this thread has a lot of pages.

Lol - I am wondering if the people who voted for her - voted for McAuliffe - would he have won? But let’s not answer now - too early. Let’s see when all results are in if it would have made a difference.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s kind of funny how when Democrats start talking about the nuts and bolts of governance, Republicans try to distract by talking about herpes.

+1. I don’t think they’ve directly address a single substantive policy question/issue. Just keep deflecting to irrelevant nonsense.

I didn’t see McAuliffe campaigns on issues. I saw a lot of ads that just tried to link Youngkin to Trump.

DP. There you go deflecting again. We’re not talking about McAuliffe’s policy positions, we are talking about the feasibility of Youngkin’s campaign promises. That is what matters now, not what McAuliffe would have done if elected. Can you address any of the substantive questions raised in the past couple of pages as to how Youngkin will achieve his stated policy goals?

Why do you care. You will never support anything he does and whine about him for the next four years. And you’ll have to send your kids to Kumon for CRT.

Anonymous wrote:Why do Republicans think they’re more than one person? It’s always them saying stupid things like “+100.”

That’s all you’ve got tonight, huh? Maybe they identify as more than one person. How dare you assume.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Starting tomorrow I’m going to start hauling my garbage cans across the American Legion Bridge and dumping them out along Georgetown Pike or Chain Bridge Road every week. Odds are some of it will wind up in the yards of the scum that voted for this racist, sexist, evil monster.

If Virginia wants to be trash, then I’m going to help you look the part.

Enjoy my litter.

I love the way liberals aren't even trying to hide their true selves under a veneer of manufactured "virtue." Fly that vile flag! Show your true ugly colors. We see you, as we always have.

We saw you beating police officers with flags when you lost an election. But be sure to get big mad about dumb posts on a website.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin is not interested in giving public schools more money.

Voucher money can go directly to kids already in private schools - just like it did in Indiana.

We don't hate public schools here. We're mad right now. But we don't hate public schools and we don't want to destroy them. We don't want vouchers.

That’s unfortunate since Glenn Youngkin specifically campaigned on school vouchers.

DP and I sure as hell want vouchers. I don’t think they destroy schools and I do think school choice is at least a step in the right direction. I’m a former IB public school teacher and I’d never want my kids going where I used to teach.

Of course they destroy schools. That's the point.

Well they do destroy the school that parents are desperate to get out of, but, good.

If you’ve never sent your kids to or worked in that kind of school, you don’t get it. You are living in your GS10 bubble. But I’ve seen some shit and I would do anything to give those kids a lifeboat out of there.

I’ve seen it and I don’t think vouchers are the answers. They leave the worst of the worst in public school rather than improving for all.

You’re not improving for all now. You’re just sitting in your GS10 bubble failing all the kids except your richie rich kids and your neighbors. It’s gross. You’re gross.

You realize not everyone who wants to go to the charter gets to, right? That it’s a lottery? So you just don’t care about the kids who don’t get in? The state I grew up in now has them and it has absolutely made the already bad public schools worse. And it’s the more resourceful parents that get their kids in. The ones who will be fine either way because their parents care. You aren’t helping the kids whose parents don’t care and they are the ones who need it.

I don’t claim to have all the answers. My mom was a teacher at a Title 1 school who saw a lot of shit too. A lot. But charter schools aren’t helping the school where she taught nor the other bad ones in that public district.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are mail in ballots an outstanding factor here?

I certainly hope so. I’m pretty despondent at the moment, but I’m still hoping they can find a couple hundred thousand more McAuliffe votes that they hadn’t noticed before.

Don’t worry, they will. That’s the Dim playbook and Stacey Abrams has been busy ensuring the pallet of back up ballets is ready to go.

Why do Republicans think they’re more than one person? It’s always them saying stupid things like “+100.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Make no mistake about it: This election is all about defeating CRR. Next up is the trans agenda.

Parents have had enough

I agree parents have had enough, but it’s not all about CRR and trans issues. Democrats closed schools for an entire year. People living in Virginia looked around at republican run states and saw their kids in school. With COVID not over and threats of new variants constantly talked about, no way do parents want another Democrat in charge.

Our area schools brought kids back in to the buildings around the same time as many other schools.

5-11 can get vaccinated within days.

Totally irrational decision making.

It was irrational for the Ds to have their head in the sand on how big of an issue this really was.

What? School closures? They happened all over the world. There was a global pandemic.

No, we lagged way behind the rest of the world in getting our kids back to learning.

Nope. When our kids went back in Feb/Mar there were many other schools (~40%) still transitioning back to school at the same time.

Am I misunderstanding what you’re saying or is 60% more than 40%?

It was constantly changing over a period of time. I’d have to look up exact numbers again but roughly:

Jan 2020 - >50% of US kids had only virtual option
Feb 2020 - ~40% only had virtual option (this is when some public schools in our area started sending back younger grades)
Mar 2020 - ~30% only has virtual option (all kids were back)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Are mail in ballots an outstanding factor here?

Yes, if postmarked today, ballots received by Friday can be counted.

That is not what ‘outstanding factor’ means. They’re asking if it’s enough to effect the determination of the race and the answer is no.

The Youngkin lead is too great.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Starting tomorrow I’m going to start hauling my garbage cans across the American Legion Bridge and dumping them out along Georgetown Pike or Chain Bridge Road every week. Odds are some of it will wind up in the yards of the scum that voted for this racist, sexist, evil monster.

If Virginia wants to be trash, then I’m going to help you look the part.

Enjoy my litter.

This is the Left. This is why we don’t want you running things.

Dumping trash when you’re mad about an election result is a lot better than what the Right did.

Anonymous wrote:Keep an eye on my earlier Princess question though as the race continues to narrow.

What was your question? Genuinely asking..this thread has a lot of pages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Youngkin is not interested in giving public schools more money.

Voucher money can go directly to kids already in private schools - just like it did in Indiana.

We don't hate public schools here. We're mad right now. But we don't hate public schools and we don't want to destroy them. We don't want vouchers.

That’s unfortunate since Glenn Youngkin specifically campaigned on school vouchers.

DP and I sure as hell want vouchers. I don’t think they destroy schools and I do think school choice is at least a step in the right direction. I’m a former IB public school teacher and I’d never want my kids going where I used to teach.

Of course they destroy schools. That's the point.

Well they do destroy the school that parents are desperate to get out of, but, good.

If you’ve never sent your kids to or worked in that kind of school, you don’t get it. You are living in your GS10 bubble. But I’ve seen some shit and I would do anything to give those kids a lifeboat out of there.

You think those kids will secure a spot at a private? Most won’t and the schools will continue to decline.

I think anything—ANYTHING—is better than where they are now. A charter that fails halfway through the school year. A 90 minute commute across town to a rich kid school. A parochial school. Anything.

You “liberals” are offering nothing but more money for the same failing staff. No thank you. I want to save the kid, not the school.

+100

So I guess no Youngkin supporters can answer the questions about his tax proposals?