Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you talking about property values again??! Please just STOP! This is about children and schools..
I don't have kids in school and planning to downsize. Losing 100-200K is huge for me. I suspect that will happen with 30% FARMS.
40-50% FARMS will actually result in a bigger drop and I won't have any equity left for retirement.
Your house is not a good retirement plan. It’s not going to impact things.
Its a big chunk of my net worth and I was going to downsize soon. It was surely a big part of my retiurement plan.
You purchased an asset that can go up and down in value. Grow up and stop trying to influence school policies so you can benefit from a property value that is rooted in segregation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.
Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.
I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.
Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.
Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?
If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.
There are no Title I high schools in MCPS.
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/dtecps/title1/schools/
Thank you. I wonder why the percentages don’t apply to the high schools.
So some folks are falsely stating that segregation is in low income kids' best interest because they get more funding that way, except they don't. DCUM, never change.
Anonymous wrote:
You purchased an asset that can go up and down in value. Grow up and stop trying to influence school policies so you can benefit from a property value that is rooted in segregation.
This!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everyone is as racist as you and will only move somewhere where the schools are white I mean good (which is what you are basically saying). If the neighborhood is good and your kid can excel at school there is no issue. There is an issue however with your “white” priviledge. You are living in a predominently white nice neighborhood because of segregation and oppression. If you can’t get that them I am sorry…
This is why Trump won.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.
Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.
I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.
Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.
Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?
If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.
There are no Title I high schools in MCPS.
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/dtecps/title1/schools/
Thank you. I wonder why the percentages don’t apply to the high schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everyone is as racist as you and will only move somewhere where the schools are white I mean good (which is what you are basically saying). If the neighborhood is good and your kid can excel at school there is no issue. There is an issue however with your “white” priviledge. You are living in a predominently white nice neighborhood because of segregation and oppression. If you can’t get that them I am sorry…
This is why Trump won.
Anonymous wrote:Yeah I think if the primary goal was utilization then option 2 is the only answer. Or some other solution for options 1 and 4 that lets kids in overcrowded schools choose to go to underutilized schools (without providing busing).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.
Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.
I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.
Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.
Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?
If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.
There are no Title I high schools in MCPS.
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/dtecps/title1/schools/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.
Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.
I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.
Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.
Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?
If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not everyone is as racist as you and will only move somewhere where the schools are white I mean good (which is what you are basically saying). If the neighborhood is good and your kid can excel at school there is no issue. There is an issue however with your “white” priviledge. You are living in a predominently white nice neighborhood because of segregation and oppression. If you can’t get that them I am sorry…
This is why Trump won.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.
Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.
I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.
Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.
Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?
If it is over 50% FARMS that makes it a Title I school leading to greater funding. I think Wheaton was like 57% FARMS….but that was a while ago.
Anonymous wrote:Not everyone is as racist as you and will only move somewhere where the schools are white I mean good (which is what you are basically saying). If the neighborhood is good and your kid can excel at school there is no issue. There is an issue however with your “white” priviledge. You are living in a predominently white nice neighborhood because of segregation and oppression. If you can’t get that them I am sorry…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.
Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.
I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.
Redistributing farms is not a good idea as they lose funding and kids will still self segregate.
Which schools specifically receive extra funding because of their FARMS rates?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you not see new plan? Demographics is def. number one priority going forward.
Yah, goal is to have all schools perfrom similar. I susopect bussing will be huge part of this plan by distributing all kids in different schools. It won't help any kid but it will look good on paper when reviewing school's disparity.
I am convinced that BOE will do all they can to distribute FARMS. Some variation of option 3 is going to be boundary. No other option will match with that they sare saying in their strategic plan for 2026-2030.
Show me the money
They’ll just demand and get more money to waste.