Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Walz is bringing it.
He will wipe the floor with Vance, and knows it. Vance has yet to respond.![]()
Vance is not stupid. He is reasonably well spoken, and at least trained to be a lawyer. While I don't think this debate will move the needle in any way, I also don't think anyone is wiping the floor with anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Walz is bringing it.
He will wipe the floor with Vance, and knows it. Vance has yet to respond.![]()
Vance is not stupid. He is reasonably well spoken, and at least trained to be a lawyer. While I don't think this debate will move the needle in any way, I also don't think anyone is wiping the floor with anyone else.
Totally agree. Just ask Tim Ryan of OH. Vance trounced him in several debates
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/10/17/ohio-ryan-vance-pelosi-trump-00062220
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Walz is bringing it.
He will wipe the floor with Vance, and knows it. Vance has yet to respond.![]()
Vance is not stupid. He is reasonably well spoken, and at least trained to be a lawyer. While I don't think this debate will move the needle in any way, I also don't think anyone is wiping the floor with anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:First, big fan of Tim Walz and happy to see none of this BS is sticking.
Query - is the ability and willingness to real time fact check BS attempts to “swift-boat” a candidate the good side of so much experience with misinformation and conspiracy theories?
It gives me hope.
We can all see what a good man Tim Walz is and why Harris picked him. It says a lot of good things about her that she close him as well.
People can be “good” and not have what it takes to lead a country. A leader needs to be strategic, driven and even ruthless to an extent. I have seen that in the Republican VP candidate, but not so much the Democratic one.
+1
Tim Walz might be a “nice guy,” but in no way do I see him ready to lead the country (if necessary) through tough - and unpopular - decisions. Or Kamala Harris, for that matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Walz is bringing it.
He will wipe the floor with Vance, and knows it. Vance has yet to respond.![]()
Vance is not stupid. He is reasonably well spoken, and at least trained to be a lawyer. While I don't think this debate will move the needle in any way, I also don't think anyone is wiping the floor with anyone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Walz is bringing it.
He will wipe the floor with Vance, and knows it. Vance has yet to respond.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Walz is bringing it.
He will wipe the floor with Vance, and knows it. Vance has yet to respond.![]()
Anonymous wrote:
Walz is bringing it.
