Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Correct.
SC Surf
Los Gatos United
Don’t all of a sudden become great. It’s all location based. SC Surf won’t pull any new players, because they are so deep in SC that all the best players in that area are already there…
Now if a big club like CUP. City SC. tophat. IMG
We’re to go ECNL, then they would pull kids from the other local ECNL clubs.
All location based.
You don't know your locations very well...IMG teams are trash until U16 and above, and in "deep" SC there's 50 plus girls who leave that area to play ECNL.
Anonymous wrote:Correct.
SC Surf
Los Gatos United
Don’t all of a sudden become great. It’s all location based. SC Surf won’t pull any new players, because they are so deep in SC that all the best players in that area are already there…
Now if a big club like CUP. City SC. tophat. IMG
We’re to go ECNL, then they would pull kids from the other local ECNL clubs.
All location based.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To be 100%. With all the mid level clubs leaving leagues, one thing stays the same. If you play in the top 20 clubs in ECNL and the top 10 clubs in GA….you are golden 😬
100% I wish more people understood.
Id fix with If you are a female player with all the mid level clubs leaving leagues, one thing stays the same. If you play in the top 40 clubs in ECNL and the top 15 clubs in GA….you are golden
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To be 100%. With all the mid level clubs leaving leagues, one thing stays the same. If you play in the top 20 clubs in ECNL and the top 10 clubs in GA….you are golden 😬
100% I wish more people understood.
Anonymous wrote:To be 100%. With all the mid level clubs leaving leagues, one thing stays the same. If you play in the top 20 clubs in ECNL and the top 10 clubs in GA….you are golden 😬
Anonymous wrote:South Carolina surf was a middle of the road club in GA. so that means they will be at the bottom of the RL standings in each age group. oh my.
Anonymous wrote:South Carolina surf was a middle of the road club in GA. so that means they will be at the bottom of the RL standings in each age group. oh my.
Anonymous wrote:Looks like GA lost Lexington SC (KY), S. Carolina Surf (SC), and Los Gatos United (NorCal). Each has a connection to either ECNL boys or USL so I'm guessing they didn't get MLSn so they hopped to RL. Oh well, none of them were really great. Between the 3 of them across all ages ie 18 teams, they had about 3 winning teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lexington SC moving from GA Mid America to ECNL RL was a good move.
They just went from 3rd Tier to 2nd Tier. Congratulations on moving up!!
Is this what recruiters think?
I really have no idea. Lexington was +300 ranked in all the age groups I glanced over.
Come on now! Rankings only matter when they’re used to show how a bad club joined GA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lexington SC moving from GA Mid America to ECNL RL was a good move.
They just went from 3rd Tier to 2nd Tier. Congratulations on moving up!!
Is this what recruiters think?
I really have no idea. Lexington was +300 ranked in all the age groups I glanced over.
Anonymous wrote:Lexington SC moving from GA Mid America to ECNL RL was a good move.
They just went from 3rd Tier to 2nd Tier. Congratulations on moving up!!