Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I once was invited to a wedding of some Puerto Rican acquaintances, and asked if I should bring the kids. They looked at me as if I were an alien and told me of course, what kind of wedding doesn't have children there?
No kid weddings are definitely an Anglo-American thing. I’ve never been to a Jewish, Eastern-European or Hispanic wedding where kids weren’t invited.
I don’t know if either way is better, but just an observation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We always bring our kids to weddings. No one ever cares and most love seeing our kids and how they are growing up!
People do care. They are too polite to say otherwise.
No one cares about your kids and “how they are growing up.”
I once was invited to a wedding of some Puerto Rican acquaintances, and asked if I should bring the kids. They looked at me as if I were an alien and told me of course, what kind of wedding doesn't have children there?
No kid weddings are definitely an Anglo-American thing. I’ve never been to a Jewish, Eastern-European or Hispanic wedding where kids weren’t invited.
I don’t know if either way is better, but just an observation.
I grew up Catholic and have never been invited to a Catholic wedding that was no-child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We always bring our kids to weddings. No one ever cares and most love seeing our kids and how they are growing up!
People do care. They are too polite to say otherwise.
No one cares about your kids and “how they are growing up.”
I once was invited to a wedding of some Puerto Rican acquaintances, and asked if I should bring the kids. They looked at me as if I were an alien and told me of course, what kind of wedding doesn't have children there?
No kid weddings are definitely an Anglo-American thing. I’ve never been to a Jewish, Eastern-European or Hispanic wedding where kids weren’t invited.
I don’t know if either way is better, but just an observation.
I grew up Catholic and have never been invited to a Catholic wedding that was no-child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We always bring our kids to weddings. No one ever cares and most love seeing our kids and how they are growing up!
People do care. They are too polite to say otherwise.
No one cares about your kids and “how they are growing up.”
I once was invited to a wedding of some Puerto Rican acquaintances, and asked if I should bring the kids. They looked at me as if I were an alien and told me of course, what kind of wedding doesn't have children there?
No kid weddings are definitely an Anglo-American thing. I’ve never been to a Jewish, Eastern-European or Hispanic wedding where kids weren’t invited.
I don’t know if either way is better, but just an observation.
Anonymous wrote:I once was invited to a wedding of some Puerto Rican acquaintances, and asked if I should bring the kids. They looked at me as if I were an alien and told me of course, what kind of wedding doesn't have children there?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We always bring our kids to weddings. No one ever cares and most love seeing our kids and how they are growing up!
People do care. They are too polite to say otherwise.
No one cares about your kids and “how they are growing up.”
I once was invited to a wedding of some Puerto Rican acquaintances, and asked if I should bring the kids. They looked at me as if I were an alien and told me of course, what kind of wedding doesn't have children there?
No kid weddings are definitely an Anglo-American thing. I’ve never been to a Jewish, Eastern-European or Hispanic wedding where kids weren’t invited.
I don’t know if either way is better, but just an observation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I see no children as nobody under 12. If the brewery was actually the issue she should've said no minors. But children is a specific word usually used to refer to the 12 and under set. So I understand OP's uncertainty.
Adults only would be only people over 18. She should've used this if that was her prerogative. I wonder if people who had toddlers received different invitations with the wording on it? Not everyone will look online. Really comes down to what the formal invite said on the envelope. I would decline now due to not previously understanding kids can't come.
There’s no “uncertainty” if the children’s names weren’t specifically on the outer envelope or the inner envelope. There’s no “confusion.” There’s no “interpretation” to make.
WELL OBVIOUSLY THERE IS OR WE WOULDN"T HAVE THIS 150 PAGE THREAD WOULD WE NANCY
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:An evening reception is no place for children anyway.
A 16 year old? What time do you think they go to bed?
It’s not about bedtime, moron, it’s about access to alcohol.
Anonymous wrote:1. Your kids are not welcome. There is nothing to “interpret”.
2. I wouldn’t fly to California in the midst of a global pandemic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This reminds me of my husband's cousins wedding. She wrote no kids on the invite. So I stayed home with the kids while he flew out for the wedding. Guess what he saw when he arrived at the wedding? Kids running around the place. We felt offended.
Yes - I’ve been to weddings that say “no kids” but really it just means “no kids we don’t want.”
Or it could mean that rude guests brought their kids anyway- we had this happen at our wedding.