Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

I'd say winning half of the age groups is worth bragging about - no matter who they played. Guessing they also had kids missing games. Bottom line is they dominated the Mid-Atlantic boys, including Bethesda, Arlington, and other teams. Are they the next coming of Man City? Probably not, but certainly made some of you eat crow.

Bragging about super y league? You’re trolling, right?

But NVU won 4 out of 5 age groups!!! So impressive!! And the age group NVU didn’t win, the coach posted their VEO to slander the coach who has the team that easily went undefeated. And now they’re insecure and trolling ever thread with it. Meanwhile their bryc teams for that age group are a disaster with their bridge team paying almost nothing and in the top ncsl division while their other expensive teams are a joke which puts them in a bind. Also the Bethesda 10 team ranked 3rd in the country and previously destroyed teams up an age group went 6-1-1 and 3-4-1 in super y. Obviously because the best 137 kids didn’t play. Both those teams would easily be undefeated with regular rosters.

Less than half of this is remotely true, but you've made your point that you spend all your time here and are scared shitless that BRYC will beat your kid's team.

LOL has any bryc 2010 team ever played top bracket of even a weak tournament? They lose double digits every game!

Do you hear yourself? You are talking about 11yo kids playing a game. Who’s the loser here?

No matter the age they keep a score for a reason. Even if parents dont want to believe it. The 11 year old kids know who sucks and who's good.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

I'd say winning half of the age groups is worth bragging about - no matter who they played. Guessing they also had kids missing games. Bottom line is they dominated the Mid-Atlantic boys, including Bethesda, Arlington, and other teams. Are they the next coming of Man City? Probably not, but certainly made some of you eat crow.

Bragging about super y league? You’re trolling, right?

But NVU won 4 out of 5 age groups!!! So impressive!! And the age group NVU didn’t win, the coach posted their VEO to slander the coach who has the team that easily went undefeated. And now they’re insecure and trolling ever thread with it. Meanwhile their bryc teams for that age group are a disaster with their bridge team paying almost nothing and in the top ncsl division while their other expensive teams are a joke which puts them in a bind. Also the Bethesda 10 team ranked 3rd in the country and previously destroyed teams up an age group went 6-1-1 and 3-4-1 in super y. Obviously because the best 137 kids didn’t play. Both those teams would easily be undefeated with regular rosters.

Less than half of this is remotely true, but you've made your point that you spend all your time here and are scared shitless that BRYC will beat your kid's team.

LOL has any bryc 2010 team ever played top bracket of even a weak tournament? They lose double digits every game!

Do you hear yourself? You are talking about 11yo kids playing a game. Who’s the loser here?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

I'd say winning half of the age groups is worth bragging about - no matter who they played. Guessing they also had kids missing games. Bottom line is they dominated the Mid-Atlantic boys, including Bethesda, Arlington, and other teams. Are they the next coming of Man City? Probably not, but certainly made some of you eat crow.

Bragging about super y league? You’re trolling, right?

But NVU won 4 out of 5 age groups!!! So impressive!! And the age group NVU didn’t win, the coach posted their VEO to slander the coach who has the team that easily went undefeated. And now they’re insecure and trolling ever thread with it. Meanwhile their bryc teams for that age group are a disaster with their bridge team paying almost nothing and in the top ncsl division while their other expensive teams are a joke which puts them in a bind. Also the Bethesda 10 team ranked 3rd in the country and previously destroyed teams up an age group went 6-1-1 and 3-4-1 in super y. Obviously because the best 137 kids didn’t play. Both those teams would easily be undefeated with regular rosters.

Less than half of this is remotely true, but you've made your point that you spend all your time here and are scared shitless that BRYC will beat your kid's team.

LOL has any bryc 2010 team ever played top bracket of even a weak tournament? They lose double digits every game!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

I'd say winning half of the age groups is worth bragging about - no matter who they played. Guessing they also had kids missing games. Bottom line is they dominated the Mid-Atlantic boys, including Bethesda, Arlington, and other teams. Are they the next coming of Man City? Probably not, but certainly made some of you eat crow.

Bragging about super y league? You’re trolling, right?

But NVU won 4 out of 5 age groups!!! So impressive!! And the age group NVU didn’t win, the coach posted their VEO to slander the coach who has the team that easily went undefeated. And now they’re insecure and trolling ever thread with it. Meanwhile their bryc teams for that age group are a disaster with their bridge team paying almost nothing and in the top ncsl division while their other expensive teams are a joke which puts them in a bind. Also the Bethesda 10 team ranked 3rd in the country and previously destroyed teams up an age group went 6-1-1 and 3-4-1 in super y. Obviously because the best 137 kids didn’t play. Both those teams would easily be undefeated with regular rosters.

Less than half of this is remotely true, but you've made your point that you spend all your time here and are scared shitless that BRYC will beat your kid's team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

I'd say winning half of the age groups is worth bragging about - no matter who they played. Guessing they also had kids missing games. Bottom line is they dominated the Mid-Atlantic boys, including Bethesda, Arlington, and other teams. Are they the next coming of Man City? Probably not, but certainly made some of you eat crow.

Bragging about super y league? You’re trolling, right?

But NVU won 4 out of 5 age groups!!! So impressive!! And the age group NVU didn’t win, the coach posted their VEO to slander the coach who has the team that easily went undefeated. And now they’re insecure and trolling ever thread with it. Meanwhile their bryc teams for that age group are a disaster with their bridge team paying almost nothing and in the top ncsl division while their other expensive teams are a joke which puts them in a bind. Also the Bethesda 10 team ranked 3rd in the country and previously destroyed teams up an age group went 6-1-1 and 3-4-1 in super y. Obviously because the best 137 kids didn’t play. Both those teams would easily be undefeated with regular rosters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

I'd say winning half of the age groups is worth bragging about - no matter who they played. Guessing they also had kids missing games. Bottom line is they dominated the Mid-Atlantic boys, including Bethesda, Arlington, and other teams. Are they the next coming of Man City? Probably not, but certainly made some of you eat crow.

Bragging about super y league? You’re trolling, right?

But NVU won 4 out of 5 age groups!!! So impressive!! And the age group NVU didn’t win, the coach posted their VEO to slander the coach who has the team that easily went undefeated. And now they’re insecure and trolling ever thread with it. Meanwhile their bryc teams for that age group are a disaster with their bridge team paying almost nothing and in the top ncsl division while their other expensive teams are a joke which puts them in a bind. Also the Bethesda 10 team ranked 3rd in the country and previously destroyed teams up an age group went 6-1-1 and 3-4-1 in super y. Obviously because the best 137 kids didn’t play. Both those teams would easily be undefeated with regular rosters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

I'd say winning half of the age groups is worth bragging about - no matter who they played. Guessing they also had kids missing games. Bottom line is they dominated the Mid-Atlantic boys, including Bethesda, Arlington, and other teams. Are they the next coming of Man City? Probably not, but certainly made some of you eat crow.

Bragging about super y league? You’re trolling, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

I'd say winning half of the age groups is worth bragging about - no matter who they played. Guessing they also had kids missing games. Bottom line is they dominated the Mid-Atlantic boys, including Bethesda, Arlington, and other teams. Are they the next coming of Man City? Probably not, but certainly made some of you eat crow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

I'd say winning half of the age groups is worth bragging about - no matter who they played. Guessing they also had kids missing games. Bottom line is they dominated the Mid-Atlantic boys, including Bethesda, Arlington, and other teams. Are they the next coming of Man City? Probably not, but certainly made some of you eat crow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Nothing to brag about when you’re talking super y. They played teams that barely had enough players show up, no goalies, or had players playing up 2-3 years so they could field a team. That’s super y. Competition varies week to week depending on how many kids are available to play. Also, they didn’t play any teams that compete in ECNL or MLS. Truly nothing to brag about. If they can move from the bottom in ECNL rankings, then you can come here to brag.

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Anonymous wrote:For all the idiots who were bashing Northern Virginia United in this and other threads. They won four of the boys Super Y leagues in their first year. Apparently doing something right. Go ahead...make your "Super Y sucks" comments...what did you do with your summer?

Anonymous wrote:For girls the Teal U10 team is an academy team not bridge. But they had multiple teams at U9 and I thought they had enough for 2-3 academy teams for the fall so not sure what’s happening.