Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If a rabid dog appeared from the woods and bit your kid, would you actually engage with the animal?
Do you think this man was wearing a sign saying “I shoot kids”? Obviously the victims could not immediately tell this man was homicidal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If a rabid dog appeared from the woods and bit your kid, would you actually engage with the animal?
Do you think this man was wearing a sign saying “I shoot kids”? Obviously the victims could not immediately tell this man was homicidal.
But he was ramming kids with a scooter so while they didn't know he had a gun and would shoot kids, he obv didn't GAF about them kids and was spoiling for some kind of fight.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, so here's the thing about the gun argument. [b]Guns proliferate in other communities, but they don't seem to share in the violence that overtakes some cities/communities. Simply saying "GUNS" is simplistic and doesn't come close to identifying deep problems that you probably don't want to discuss anyway.[b]
Also, Australia. Yeah, an island nation that would be pretty easy to seal off from illegal weapons. The USA, not so much. Not to be cliche, but it really applies: when you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. That's just how it is with porous borders and many, many guns in circulation. It's a pipedream if you think we could outlaw guns and get rid of "gun violence" at the same time.
+1. Yep. There are plenty of communities with lots of guns, but not all of them are as violent as DC. So there is something else going on, but I think people are afraid to have that conversation.
+2 We have plenty of guns here in NOVA, people just seem to know how to behave better.
I lol every time one of these woke DC residents complains about evil Virginia and all the guns coming into their shining city and ruining everything for the otherwise model citizens. Ummm... you realize that guns from Virginia ALSO flow into *gasp* Virginia. And we are doing just fine. So I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that perhaps DC's problem is the people living in DC, not the boogieman across the potomac.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If a rabid dog appeared from the woods and bit your kid, would you actually engage with the animal?
Do you think this man was wearing a sign saying “I shoot kids”? Obviously the victims could not immediately tell this man was homicidal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do it. The American motto.
Take the loser giving-up attitude elsewhere.
Democrats are about fixing things, improving things, action, work, and progress.
Be the change you want to see in the world.
Are you being serious? Do you know how long Democrats have been in charge of DC?
DC’s been improving rapidly for decades?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do it. The American motto.
Take the loser giving-up attitude elsewhere.
Democrats are about fixing things, improving things, action, work, and progress.
Be the change you want to see in the world.
Lol. Democrats are the change they want to see in the world, hence the crime situation.
Actually crime in almost all major cities went down for decades and is still super low?
Anonymous wrote:If a rabid dog appeared from the woods and bit your kid, would you actually engage with the animal?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, so here's the thing about the gun argument. [b]Guns proliferate in other communities, but they don't seem to share in the violence that overtakes some cities/communities. Simply saying "GUNS" is simplistic and doesn't come close to identifying deep problems that you probably don't want to discuss anyway.[b]
Also, Australia. Yeah, an island nation that would be pretty easy to seal off from illegal weapons. The USA, not so much. Not to be cliche, but it really applies: when you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns. That's just how it is with porous borders and many, many guns in circulation. It's a pipedream if you think we could outlaw guns and get rid of "gun violence" at the same time.
+1. Yep. There are plenty of communities with lots of guns, but not all of them are as violent as DC. So there is something else going on, but I think people are afraid to have that conversation.
+2 We have plenty of guns here in NOVA, people just seem to know how to behave better.
I lol every time one of these woke DC residents complains about evil Virginia and all the guns coming into their shining city and ruining everything for the otherwise model citizens. Ummm... you realize that guns from Virginia ALSO flow into *gasp* Virginia. And we are doing just fine. So I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that perhaps DC's problem is the people living in DC, not the boogieman across the potomac.
Anonymous wrote:If a rabid dog appeared from the woods and bit your kid, would you actually engage with the animal?
Anonymous wrote:"This is a horrible story and one which should teach everyone to be very careful."
It is a horrible story, but instead of teaching people to be "very careful," it should instead serve as evidence for moving to a safer place where your chances of running into people like Bedley are fewer and far between.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I find it awfully hard to believe that none of the "street smart" posters who blame the victims for engaging would never, if their kids were almost hit by a stranger on a scooter, impulsively open their mouths.
You don't know how you'd react in a situation until you're in it.
+1. It makes them feel safe to believe they’re so superior that such a tragedy would never happen to them.
Exactly. If someone tries to run your 5 year old over with an electric scooter and you don’t react in an impulsive, emotional way you are probably either a sociopath, hate your family, or both.
No they are arguing you should protect your family instead of engaging the perpetrator. I don’t see how arguing with someone who intentionally harmed your family can have a positive outcome. What exactly are you hoping will happen by yelling at them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do it. The American motto.
Take the loser giving-up attitude elsewhere.
Democrats are about fixing things, improving things, action, work, and progress.
Be the change you want to see in the world.
Are you being serious? Do you know how long Democrats have been in charge of DC?
DC’s been improving rapidly for decades?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do it. The American motto.
Take the loser giving-up attitude elsewhere.
Democrats are about fixing things, improving things, action, work, and progress.
Be the change you want to see in the world.
Are you being serious? Do you know how long Democrats have been in charge of DC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just do it. The American motto.
Take the loser giving-up attitude elsewhere.
Democrats are about fixing things, improving things, action, work, and progress.
Be the change you want to see in the world.
Lol. Democrats are the change they want to see in the world, hence the crime situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is America - get into a verbal beef with someone and you run a good chance of getting shot. This is certainly not unique to cities. It's tragic.
What about the 4 year old kid?
If you have kids with you all the more reason not to argue with strangers. People who live in DC shouldn’t believe they are exempt from violence because they are white or own an expensive house in Logan Circle.
Victim blame much?
We don’t even know if the mother “argued.” She could have just asked the guy to move the scooter.
Why? Seriously why? If it was in her way he saw her and was being an assh#. If it wasn’t in her way why say anything at all. Just move it when he’s gone
Is there some rule book that I can read that can help me know how I can interact with people without getting shot?
Apparently there are all sorts of rules that I was not aware of that would make me a deserved victim of violent crime (and death) that only apply to living in DC but nowhere else.
Help me understand this please!
Is this a serious question? Yes, there are rules in a city, especially DC right now. They are MYOB and STFU. Don’t get into confrontations with strangers on the street. If you get mugged or carjacked, hand it over as calmly as possible.
So we are to allow the most violent among us to control and regulate us for fear that they will arbitrarily exact violence against us?
I’m sorry but I’m not going to live like a hostage to psychotic sociopaths every time I walk outside my house. I’m sad that you feel that you need to.
I mean, what do you want me to say? You apparently feel that due to some intrinsic quality or special right you have, you are immune from crime. You’re not.
DP. So you hide from strangers and are afraid to use your voice in front of them? Your life must be so sad and small.
No, I don’t hide from strangers. I use basic street smarts. If you think that somehow ruins one’s life, maybe you’re not cut out to live in a city.
NP. Look, I get it. You can't afford to move outside the city. But that doesn't mean you need to rationalize violence and death as a normal daily thing that everyone should just accept