Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would 100 percent buy my child a nice home if I could. Who wouldn't want to create intergenerational wealth for their child or grandchild.
What I find bizzare, however, are people who lead others to believe they are Neiman Marcus achievers when really they earn a Macy's living and got an inheritance or financial help from parents or whatever. Or they behave same but instead of money from parents, they consume as much free stuff as possible and sell lots of used items for under $10 for cash on FB.
Yeah I have known lots of people like this. They don’t really let anyone know about the hundreds of thousands of dollars they get from their family. Instead they represent themselves as great financial successes.
When you guys say these people represent themselves in a certain way, what do you mean? Like how does it even come up?
In my opinion, if you celebrate your expensive homes and vacations irl and online, but you don’t acknowledge that you really didn’t pay for those things, then you’re misrepresenting your circumstances in a self-serving way that’s harmful to others. It’s kinda similar to women online who post beauty pics of themselves but pretend they never had plastic surgery.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This whole thread would be irrelevant if people could just mind their own business, focus on their own life rather than others, and seek happiness outside of material things.
Do you also not realize how privileged you are to be able to criticize other well off people for not being well off in the “right way”?
90% of you need to look into therapy.
Weirdly defensive response addressed to no one, bro.
+1. I suspect this thread touched on a sore spot for PP.
-1. I’m the PP you’re referring to and I would love if my parents bought me a house but sadly they are poor, so I don’t really have anything to be sore about. I’m just sick of the general awful attitude of people on this forum, clearly you included. It has become nothing but bickering and the constant theme is judging others based on money and neighborhoods and career, etc. Yeah yeah if I don’t like it I can leave — I know. But I use this forum to get insight on a few topics, mostly real estate related.
You sound whiny and negative. No one is forcing you to read or respond to posts or threads you don’t like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a nanny and my parents bought me a $750k 3br condo. I’m single and childless. I would have never been able to afford to be a homeowner on my salary, and now I can have a home while working a job I love. If I had to buy it on my own, I wouldn’t have been able to work as a nanny and I love the kids in my care.
My parents did the same for my brother, but his home was 1million+. My parents put their beach home in my name to even things out. I never asked for the home and I’m really grateful to have this security.
Yeah, you are the person the rest of us are allowed to hate.
To clarify, what exactly is the reason here for permitted hate? That she received good fortune and generosity from her loved ones?
Is this “hateful” behavior, or is this projected jealousy?
I'm not jealous of a nanny living in her daddy's 3 bedroom condo, LOL. That's just sad.
I absolutely hate the mentality, and the parent who is enabling their kid.
So, you are right, I shouldn't hate the nanny, but I do kind of hate her parents for enabling bad life choices.
Anonymous wrote:Nanny who posted above- My grandparents helped my Mum buy her first home, and my great grandparents did the same for their kids and so on. In my family that’s kind of what people do, and I hope someday to do the same. My Dad came from absolutely nothing and my Mum’s family had what I guess you call generational wealth. My Mum always says that money is meant to be saved and passed down, to give security to the next generation. My family has always been really frugal. It might seem spoiled to have your parents buy you a home, but with that comes the understanding that you are expected to do the same for the next generation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a nanny and my parents bought me a $750k 3br condo. I’m single and childless. I would have never been able to afford to be a homeowner on my salary, and now I can have a home while working a job I love. If I had to buy it on my own, I wouldn’t have been able to work as a nanny and I love the kids in my care.
My parents did the same for my brother, but his home was 1million+. My parents put their beach home in my name to even things out. I never asked for the home and I’m really grateful to have this security.
You could have worked as a nanny, but you would not have liked the housing the salary affords. Many millions of low paid workers afford housing on their salaries. It’s just housing you would like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs bought BIL (and his wife) a house in an expensive neighborhood in Bethesda. There were no other young families there because no one in their late 20s/early 30s could afford to live there. It is a well to do neighborhood with an aging demographic.
Despite the house being fully paid for, they could not come up with the annual tax bill for it. This cost ate thru his early inheritance instead and in the end 20 years later of a marriage constantly hampered by money problems, came the divorce and the admission that they couldn't even afford to pay the real estate taxes.
One could argue that the ILs wanted to help the young family and give them a nice place to live.
One could also argue that the ILs wanted to brag to their friends and show their son was a "winner" in life with his big fancy house and so crippled him with an unaffordable asset and floated his lifestyle with an early inheritance that was not compounding but eroded.
Parents do buy adult children luxury homes, but outcomes will vary. Wait 20 years to see where the homeowners land.
Wow.
Fake story. Property taxes are low in Bethesda in particular with primary home exemption. If no mortgage that is peanuts.
Exactly. Without a mortgage in Montgomery County, I’m paying $1200/month on property tax and homeowners insurance on a 1.1 million dollar house. They must have had other issues if they couldn’t come up with the annual tax bill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs bought BIL (and his wife) a house in an expensive neighborhood in Bethesda. There were no other young families there because no one in their late 20s/early 30s could afford to live there. It is a well to do neighborhood with an aging demographic.
Despite the house being fully paid for, they could not come up with the annual tax bill for it. This cost ate thru his early inheritance instead and in the end 20 years later of a marriage constantly hampered by money problems, came the divorce and the admission that they couldn't even afford to pay the real estate taxes.
One could argue that the ILs wanted to help the young family and give them a nice place to live.
One could also argue that the ILs wanted to brag to their friends and show their son was a "winner" in life with his big fancy house and so crippled him with an unaffordable asset and floated his lifestyle with an early inheritance that was not compounding but eroded.
Parents do buy adult children luxury homes, but outcomes will vary. Wait 20 years to see where the homeowners land.
Wow.
Wow, this is a great lesson learned, and a great example of why you don't create an artificial lifestyle for your kids. I'm the poster who said there is a huge difference between "help" and "float." Helping is giving your kids money for an addition or helping with a down payment for their first house. Floating is pushing them into a life that they would never be able to afford without your help. The latter is always going to be problematic.
This is exactly what I have seen happen. It may look great now, but wait 20 years, when the parents are no longer footing the bills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs bought BIL (and his wife) a house in an expensive neighborhood in Bethesda. There were no other young families there because no one in their late 20s/early 30s could afford to live there. It is a well to do neighborhood with an aging demographic.
Despite the house being fully paid for, they could not come up with the annual tax bill for it. This cost ate thru his early inheritance instead and in the end 20 years later of a marriage constantly hampered by money problems, came the divorce and the admission that they couldn't even afford to pay the real estate taxes.
One could argue that the ILs wanted to help the young family and give them a nice place to live.
One could also argue that the ILs wanted to brag to their friends and show their son was a "winner" in life with his big fancy house and so crippled him with an unaffordable asset and floated his lifestyle with an early inheritance that was not compounding but eroded.
Parents do buy adult children luxury homes, but outcomes will vary. Wait 20 years to see where the homeowners land.
Wow.
Fake story. Property taxes are low in Bethesda in particular with primary home exemption. If no mortgage that is peanuts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs bought BIL (and his wife) a house in an expensive neighborhood in Bethesda. There were no other young families there because no one in their late 20s/early 30s could afford to live there. It is a well to do neighborhood with an aging demographic.
Despite the house being fully paid for, they could not come up with the annual tax bill for it. This cost ate thru his early inheritance instead and in the end 20 years later of a marriage constantly hampered by money problems, came the divorce and the admission that they couldn't even afford to pay the real estate taxes.
One could argue that the ILs wanted to help the young family and give them a nice place to live.
One could also argue that the ILs wanted to brag to their friends and show their son was a "winner" in life with his big fancy house and so crippled him with an unaffordable asset and floated his lifestyle with an early inheritance that was not compounding but eroded.
Parents do buy adult children luxury homes, but outcomes will vary. Wait 20 years to see where the homeowners land.
Wow.
Fake story. Property taxes are low in Bethesda in particular with primary home exemption. If no mortgage that is peanuts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs bought BIL (and his wife) a house in an expensive neighborhood in Bethesda. There were no other young families there because no one in their late 20s/early 30s could afford to live there. It is a well to do neighborhood with an aging demographic.
Despite the house being fully paid for, they could not come up with the annual tax bill for it. This cost ate thru his early inheritance instead and in the end 20 years later of a marriage constantly hampered by money problems, came the divorce and the admission that they couldn't even afford to pay the real estate taxes.
One could argue that the ILs wanted to help the young family and give them a nice place to live.
One could also argue that the ILs wanted to brag to their friends and show their son was a "winner" in life with his big fancy house and so crippled him with an unaffordable asset and floated his lifestyle with an early inheritance that was not compounding but eroded.
Parents do buy adult children luxury homes, but outcomes will vary. Wait 20 years to see where the homeowners land.
Wow.
Wow, this is a great lesson learned, and a great example of why you don't create an artificial lifestyle for your kids. I'm the poster who said there is a huge difference between "help" and "float." Helping is giving your kids money for an addition or helping with a down payment for their first house. Floating is pushing them into a life that they would never be able to afford without your help. The latter is always going to be problematic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ILs bought BIL (and his wife) a house in an expensive neighborhood in Bethesda. There were no other young families there because no one in their late 20s/early 30s could afford to live there. It is a well to do neighborhood with an aging demographic.
Despite the house being fully paid for, they could not come up with the annual tax bill for it. This cost ate thru his early inheritance instead and in the end 20 years later of a marriage constantly hampered by money problems, came the divorce and the admission that they couldn't even afford to pay the real estate taxes.
One could argue that the ILs wanted to help the young family and give them a nice place to live.
One could also argue that the ILs wanted to brag to their friends and show their son was a "winner" in life with his big fancy house and so crippled him with an unaffordable asset and floated his lifestyle with an early inheritance that was not compounding but eroded.
Parents do buy adult children luxury homes, but outcomes will vary. Wait 20 years to see where the homeowners land.
Wow.