Anonymous wrote:And a Brown acceptance! Even more important, 10 MILLION in scholarships!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1 Basis also is in trouble constantly for its treatment of students with disabilities.
Fair statement 6 or 8 years ago, not today.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a fair point that Walls, Wilson and Banneker were never struggling AP HS programs. DCI could also have started out strong.
Walls and Banneker are test in schools that self select. BTW the average pass points at DCI in the IB diploma is just as good as Banneker.
You really don’t know the history of Wilson at all. It wasn’t always a higher performing school.
I know the history of Wilson. The school struggled until Dunbar, the jewel in the DCPS crown until the early 1980s, fell on hard times as the city pushed to desegregate neighborhood schools. This led to a big influx of strong black students into Wilson in just a few years.
DCI could easily offer more test-in classes within the school, and stop socially promoting. They're happy to support acceleration in middle school math, and that's about it DCI's "advanced" language classes just aren't very advanced.
BASIS doesn't socially promote, the key to their success.
And yet, Basis college acceptances are not any better than DCI’s
Come on, BASIS' college acceptances are better, particularly for UMC students. BASIS got two into MIT in 2019 and another 2 in 2020. This year, they have on into Harvard, one into Yale.
How many into MIT and Harvard from DCI?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a fair point that Walls, Wilson and Banneker were never struggling AP HS programs. DCI could also have started out strong.
Walls and Banneker are test in schools that self select. BTW the average pass points at DCI in the IB diploma is just as good as Banneker.
You really don’t know the history of Wilson at all. It wasn’t always a higher performing school.
I know the history of Wilson. The school struggled until Dunbar, the jewel in the DCPS crown until the early 1980s, fell on hard times as the city pushed to desegregate neighborhood schools. This led to a big influx of strong black students into Wilson in just a few years.
DCI could easily offer more test-in classes within the school, and stop socially promoting. They're happy to support acceleration in middle school math, and that's about it DCI's "advanced" language classes just aren't very advanced.
BASIS doesn't socially promote, the key to their success.
Anonymous wrote:DCI selects for families that can support language immersion.
Anonymous wrote:
+1 Basis also is in trouble constantly for its treatment of students with disabilities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a fair point that Walls, Wilson and Banneker were never struggling AP HS programs. DCI could also have started out strong.
Walls and Banneker are test in schools that self select. BTW the average pass points at DCI in the IB diploma is just as good as Banneker.
You really don’t know the history of Wilson at all. It wasn’t always a higher performing school.
I know the history of Wilson. The school struggled until Dunbar, the jewel in the DCPS crown until the early 1980s, fell on hard times as the city pushed to desegregate neighborhood schools. This led to a big influx of strong black students into Wilson in just a few years.
DCI could easily offer more test-in classes within the school, and stop socially promoting. They're happy to support acceleration in middle school math, and that's about it DCI's "advanced" language classes just aren't very advanced.
BASIS doesn't socially promote, the key to their success.
And yet, Basis college acceptances are not any better than DCI’s
Anonymous wrote:DCI selects for families that can support language immersion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a fair point that Walls, Wilson and Banneker were never struggling AP HS programs. DCI could also have started out strong.
Walls and Banneker are test in schools that self select. BTW the average pass points at DCI in the IB diploma is just as good as Banneker.
You really don’t know the history of Wilson at all. It wasn’t always a higher performing school.
I know the history of Wilson. The school struggled until Dunbar, the jewel in the DCPS crown until the early 1980s, fell on hard times as the city pushed to desegregate neighborhood schools. This led to a big influx of strong black students into Wilson in just a few years.
DCI could easily offer more test-in classes within the school, and stop socially promoting. They're happy to support acceleration in middle school math, and that's about it DCI's "advanced" language classes just aren't very advanced.
BASIS doesn't socially promote, the key to their success.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Washington Liberty kids have to apply to get into their IB Program. It’s certainly not IB for All like DCI. And certainly the demographics of the IB kids at WL are not close to the same as the DCI kids.
Not really. Any Washington-Liberty student with a B average freshman and sophomore year can pursue IBD junior and senior year. W-L does not offer a test-in IBD program like Richard Montgomery in Rockville and some of the Fairfax IBD programs. The demographics of Washington-Liberty are similar to the demographics in several of the DCI feeders, particularly YY.
Well that is still applying and self selecting kids. No DCI demographics isn’t like WL. Some kids at YY don’t continue to DCI and their demographics get diluted with all the other schools who feed into DCI in addition to taking new kids in 9th.
Come on, the demographics get diluted mainly because DCI refuses to track academically in middle school, other than for math and languages. Arlington offers low-key GT programming in middle school and stronger admins than DCI does, not just more favorable demographics. DCI's system just doesn't support IB Diploma-worthy high school academics for all that many students.
If DCI would only stop tossing YY graduates etc. who work at or above grade level into humanities and science classes with kids who work behind grade level, they'd keep more of the stronger feeder students. Admins don't seem to give a hoot that they lose around half of these kids to programs offering more rigor, and better discipline, BASIS, Latin, privates, the burbs. It's a vicious circle that needs political attention.
And that's exactly the problem - politically, the winds are against any tracking, haven't you noticed?
Somehow the test in schools are managing to still exist, not sure how they defend themselves while tracking goes by the wayside, but I don't see tracking being added, only removed these days (Wilson).