Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

All of those are good goals, but we are facing some immediate crises in our nation that will not go away on their own. I will continue to consider her, but in Georgia, we have been well-insulated (relatively speaking) from the gas crisis with the lowest prices in the US. Although inflation is high in the north ATL suburbs, it is low overall. Covid was handled well so our business environment is good. Crime escalated in north ATL with the defund the police nonsense, but the rest of the state fared well and ATL is getting its crap together. This is all making Georgia affordable for lower income while being an attractive home to wealthier residents. This is too precarious to screw around with for undefined abortion and climate goals that are usually too extreme to win.

This is my exact thought process. Kemp is doing a great job and Abrams has given me no reason to take a chance on her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

I’m curious; are you White?

Kemp cheated to get the job. I’m really appalled at the number of people who not only excuse that but want to reward it.

(And if you think he didn’t, then you should ask yourself why he oversaw his own election and why the election servers were wiped after they were subpoenaed.)

Ah - so you're keeping up the lie that Stacey Abrams won? But I bet you're appalled at the Stop the Steal business, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

I’m curious; are you White?

Kemp cheated to get the job. I’m really appalled at the number of people who not only excuse that but want to reward it.

(And if you think he didn’t, then you should ask yourself why he oversaw his own election and why the election servers were wiped after they were subpoenaed.)

DP. I’m Black and not voting for her, so…

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

I’m curious; are you White?

Kemp cheated to get the job. I’m really appalled at the number of people who not only excuse that but want to reward it.

(And if you think he didn’t, then you should ask yourself why he oversaw his own election and why the election servers were wiped after they were subpoenaed.)

No BLM, no Defund, no Stacey

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

+1 yes

+2. From Savannah area.

Anonymous wrote:Apparently record turnout in Georgia.

I thought the new measures in place were going to stop people voting?

That’s what the democrats swore up and down.

Exactly - the free snacks and water In the voting line and the preferential voting times may not be necessary for the vote. Perhaps equality matters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

+1 yes

Stacey is like the Kardashians. Shiny penny with no value or substance. Also - the obesity issue needs to be handled/. She is not a healthy example of anything.

She also says a lot of stuff that doesnt make sense. For example, on her website, she attacks Kemp for the massive increase in gun violence that started in 2020. I mean, gee, where did that happen and under the authority of which mayor? Come on.

Yeah, her condoning BLM vandalism, looting and arson is not a good look.

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

+1 yes

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

Oh I just noticed you said House and Senate. Yeah, the Rs are running some low quality candidates so that is definitely in play.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

All of those are good goals, but we are facing some immediate crises in our nation that will not go away on their own. I will continue to consider her, but in Georgia, we have been well-insulated (relatively speaking) from the gas crisis with the lowest prices in the US. Although inflation is high in the north ATL suburbs, it is low overall. Covid was handled well so our business environment is good. Crime escalated in north ATL with the defund the police nonsense, but the rest of the state fared well and ATL is getting its crap together. This is all making Georgia affordable for lower income while being an attractive home to wealthier residents. This is too precarious to screw around with for undefined abortion and climate goals that are usually too extreme to win.

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Looks like DCUM has been busy........

Is the WASHINGTON Free Beacon really calling DC a “territory”?

LOL. Looks like DCUM has been busy........