Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

First, black men are arrested for half the violent crimes in this country. White men are not as often arrested for the same infractions. So you're not comparing apples to apples.

70% of black children are born to single mothers, which has stayed about the same for decades. Over 50% of Hispanic children and over 30% of white children are also born to single mothers. And over 40% of children overall are born in poverty. But it is white men voting for candidates who oppose any social supports to help those children, and it is white men voting for candidates who oppose better access to birth control and abortion, so yes, they are a problem.

So you are saying that black men and black people have no responsibility or ownership over their own lives and choices? Wow.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

First, black men are arrested for half the violent crimes in this country. White men are not as often arrested for the same infractions. So you're not comparing apples to apples.

70% of black children are born to single mothers, which has stayed about the same for decades. Over 50% of Hispanic children and over 30% of white children are also born to single mothers. And over 40% of children overall are born in poverty. But it is white men voting for candidates who oppose any social supports to help those children, and it is white men voting for candidates who oppose better access to birth control and abortion, so yes, they are a problem.

And before you reply "why should white men vote to pay for programs to pay for kids that aren't theirs," it's -- AGAIN -- because white men controlled the levers of power forever and didn't create a system where fathers either could be or would be responsible for paying for their kids. If the dads are in jail, they can't make child support payments. If the dads don't have jobs because the schools suck, they can't make child support payments. If the dads could make child support payments but don't because there are no laws to establish paternity and enforcement mechanisms to collect and remit support and deter men from fathering additional children they can't afford, they won't make child support payments.

And if the moms couldn't avoid pregnancy because they are normal adults who have sex but missed their birth control because there is no access because of affirmative state laws that shut down Planned Parenthood clinics, that's on policymakers. That's a choice you made. Telling grown-ups to not have sex is not public policy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

First, black men are arrested for half the violent crimes in this country. White men are not as often arrested for the same infractions. So you're not comparing apples to apples.

70% of black children are born to single mothers, which has stayed about the same for decades. Over 50% of Hispanic children and over 30% of white children are also born to single mothers. And over 40% of children overall are born in poverty. But it is white men voting for candidates who oppose any social supports to help those children, and it is white men voting for candidates who oppose better access to birth control and abortion, so yes, they are a problem.

in what districts can a candidate win with just the white male vote?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

First, black men are arrested for half the violent crimes in this country. White men are not as often arrested for the same infractions. So you're not comparing apples to apples.

70% of black children are born to single mothers, which has stayed about the same for decades. Over 50% of Hispanic children and over 30% of white children are also born to single mothers. And over 40% of children overall are born in poverty. But it is white men voting for candidates who oppose any social supports to help those children, and it is white men voting for candidates who oppose better access to birth control and abortion, so yes, they are a problem.

I don't think voting for someone who is pro abortion will force people to have aborting and birthing contorl.

Anonymous wrote:Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

First, black men are arrested for half the violent crimes in this country. White men are not as often arrested for the same infractions. So you're not comparing apples to apples.

70% of black children are born to single mothers, which has stayed about the same for decades. Over 50% of Hispanic children and over 30% of white children are also born to single mothers. And over 40% of children overall are born in poverty. But it is white men voting for candidates who oppose any social supports to help those children, and it is white men voting for candidates who oppose better access to birth control and abortion, so yes, they are a problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

Why do you think that is?

- because they are white, privileged, and cis-gender.

If you go on Reddit, spend some time on r/conservatives, r/jordanpeterson, r/theredpill or r/rebornyouth

Anonymous wrote:Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

Why do you think that is?

Black men commit half the violent crimes in this country despite being about 6% of the population, over 70% of black children are born out of wedlock, abd black men have huge incarceration, high school
dropout and unemployment rates. But, hey, white men are the problem.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.

This. Women, minorities and foreigners have hustled to get as far as they can. White males in rust belts watched the world pass them by and have done nothing and raised their kids expecting the world to continue the same. Sorry, lazy asses, work harder.

No doubt. They don't even attempt to be rappers or ballers, what losers!

+1. Typical SJW narrative. And, in some cases, untrue. Given that black males have unemployment rates of nearly 40% in many major cities, I would hardly say that a critical mass of them are “hustling to get as far as they can.” Maybe they should “work harder.” But, I’m sorry, I guess it is only trendy to sh!t on white men now, and the SJWs will perform mental gymnastics to give black men a pass for all of their issues. .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.

This. Women, minorities and foreigners have hustled to get as far as they can. White males in rust belts watched the world pass them by and have done nothing and raised their kids expecting the world to continue the same. Sorry, lazy asses, work harder.

No doubt. They don't even attempt to be rappers or ballers, what losers!

Anonymous wrote:When you are accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.

This. Women, minorities and foreigners have hustled to get as far as they can. White males in rust belts watched the world pass them by and have done nothing and raised their kids expecting the world to continue the same. Sorry, lazy asses, work harder.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is where you lost me. Why should men who are alive today have to compete with historical statistics? The women and minorities alive now should be given the chance to succeed, as should the white men. No one is "owed" a position based on their historical representation... you weren't alive then to be wronged. Neither should a group be penalized based on their historical representation, as they weren't alive to benefit from that "privilege."

Tragedy undoubtedly happened throughout much of our country’s history. But my son wasn’t part of the problem. When did we start penalizing people for the sins of other people’s ancestors?

This in no way excuses you of your (and your white son's) obligation to pay reparations to the victms.

We have no obligation to pay reparations to anyone.

The way things are going it doesn't look like you'll be in position to pay in the next 50 years. Maybe your wives/breadwinners will be willing to cover the debt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is where you lost me. Why should men who are alive today have to compete with historical statistics? The women and minorities alive now should be given the chance to succeed, as should the white men. No one is "owed" a position based on their historical representation... you weren't alive then to be wronged. Neither should a group be penalized based on their historical representation, as they weren't alive to benefit from that "privilege."

Tragedy undoubtedly happened throughout much of our country’s history. But my son wasn’t part of the problem. When did we start penalizing people for the sins of other people’s ancestors?

This in no way excuses you of your (and your white son's) obligation to pay reparations to the victms.

We have no obligation to pay reparations to anyone.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is where you lost me. Why should men who are alive today have to compete with historical statistics? The women and minorities alive now should be given the chance to succeed, as should the white men. No one is "owed" a position based on their historical representation... you weren't alive then to be wronged. Neither should a group be penalized based on their historical representation, as they weren't alive to benefit from that "privilege."

Tragedy undoubtedly happened throughout much of our country’s history. But my son wasn’t part of the problem. When did we start penalizing people for the sins of other people’s ancestors?

I guess you are agreeing with me, then?