Anonymous
09/19/2020 11:07
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:Collins has basically gone on record saying she won’t vote for Amy Barrett because she won’t follow precedent
Collins doesnt matter. She'll be allowed to vote no.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 11:06
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they win Democrats must pack the court.
Why can’t Dems play by the rules? The Dems eliminated the filibuster for nominations, then cried when the Republicans benefited from the change.
The law of the land says the President nominates and the Senate confirms. There is nothing in the Constitution about dying wish.
If the roles were reversed, would the Dems wait?
Mitch McConnell set the precedent of waiting when there is a vacancy this close to the election. Lindsey graham personalmt said in 2018 that they wouldn’t fill a vacancy if it was In the presidents last year and the primaries had already started. Completely hypocritical.
If Trump was in his last term, you would be correct. It might not be the Presidents last year, so it’s not the same.
Nope. Y'all don't get to play this game. Bunch of hypocrites and liars who will do anything for power.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 11:04
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they win Democrats must pack the court.
Why can’t Dems play by the rules? The Dems eliminated the filibuster for nominations, then cried when the Republicans benefited from the change.
The law of the land says the President nominates and the Senate confirms. There is nothing in the Constitution about dying wish.
If the roles were reversed, would the Dems wait?
Mitch McConnell set the precedent of waiting when there is a vacancy this close to the election. Lindsey graham personalmt said in 2018 that they wouldn’t fill a vacancy if it was In the presidents last year and the primaries had already started. Completely hypocritical.
If Trump was in his last term, you would be correct. It might not be the Presidents last year, so it’s not the same.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 11:04
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Collins has basically gone on record saying she won’t vote for Amy Barrett because she won’t follow precedent
Anonymous
09/19/2020 11:03
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:
Will a Barrett nomination cause the left to lash out at Catholics? I am scared this morning for my safety.
People on this thread certainly are.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 11:02
Subject: Re:RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:The Dems can be fair -Bork, Thomas, Kavanaugh. . .
All received votes.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 11:01
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Give me a break... if the dems held the senate they would ABSOLUTELY confirm a new SC judge. Stop with the drama.
Well said!
How is it well said? The dems didn't hold up a vote for 10 months to steal a seat.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 11:00
Subject: Re:RGB Politcal Discussion
The Dems can be fair -Bork, Thomas, Kavanaugh. . .
Anonymous
09/19/2020 10:59
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:Give me a break... if the dems held the senate they would ABSOLUTELY confirm a new SC judge. Stop with the drama.
Well said!
Anonymous
09/19/2020 10:55
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Remember Trump was impeached and the justification of the GOP was let the people decide his fate in 9 months. Now they are out here letting a man that was not removed under that premise pick a lifetime appointment.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 10:51
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they win Democrats must pack the court.
Why can’t Dems play by the rules? The Dems eliminated the filibuster for nominations, then cried when the Republicans benefited from the change.
The law of the land says the President nominates and the Senate confirms. There is nothing in the Constitution about dying wish.
If the roles were reversed, would the Dems wait?
Mitch McConnell set the precedent of waiting when there is a vacancy this close to the election. Lindsey graham personalmt said in 2018 that they wouldn’t fill a vacancy if it was In the presidents last year and the primaries had already started. Completely hypocritical.
Harrison will use that quote (it's on video) in every ad between now and election day.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 10:51
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:
Will a Barrett nomination cause the left to lash out at Catholics? I am scared this morning for my safety.
What? More Catholics are Democrats than Republicans.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 10:50
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Will a Barrett nomination cause the left to lash out at Catholics? I am scared this morning for my safety.
Are you serious right now??!
- A Jew who thinks you’re crazy
+1
Those who shoot up houses of worship are right wingers.
Not always true and Catholics are particular targeted: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.catholicnewsagency.com/amp/news/cathedrals-in-6-states-damaged-by-violent-protests-91111
Oh that’s why Catholic Churches have so much security ... wait no that’s synagogues.
Just stop. You should be standing up for Jews, but you won’t.
I do stand for Jews! I think security for synagogues is very important.
Anonymous
09/19/2020 10:50
Subject: RGB Politcal Discussion
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they win Democrats must pack the court.
Why can’t Dems play by the rules? The Dems eliminated the filibuster for nominations, then cried when the Republicans benefited from the change.
The law of the land says the President nominates and the Senate confirms. There is nothing in the Constitution about dying wish.
If the roles were reversed, would the Dems wait?
Mitch McConnell set the precedent of waiting when there is a vacancy this close to the election. Lindsey graham personalmt said in 2018 that they wouldn’t fill a vacancy if it was In the presidents last year and the primaries had already started. Completely hypocritical.