Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard ain’t all that.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/03/06/elite-college-degrees-give-black-graduates-little-advantage-job-market
This uses old data. You have proved nothing. Asian have the same barriers in corporate America. Your articles are coming. Blacks at elite schools do better than other blacks because they are still black. I don’t know why this concept is so hard for you to understand? But there are many more black senior managers in corporate America than Asian senior managers. Asian CEOs outside of Asian companies are not common and many Asian companies have Anglo CEOs.
There are now a number of blacks (mostly ivy alum) that are CEOs and a bunch of senior managers. Maybe you should examine some companies instead pulling up an article based on old date.
Can you name some?
Still waiting for names, especially ivy URM alum ceos.
CEO of Merck, TIAA, Amex, Former Xerox, Vista Equity and lots of senior execs and professionals
Ok that’s 4. Four out of literally thousands of US corporations gets you <1% of CEOs. And which ones are Ivy URM alums?
And who are these, “...and lots of senior execs and professionals“?
No it’s not four. I just picked fortune 100 companies that were top of mind (I don’t walk around knowing all the black CEOs in America. I thought of Vista because the CEO paid for all the students loans for a graduating class at an HBCU recently. There are many other companies and I can not list them all for you. The level below is often where I see black in public companies. Again I can not name them all for you. I am sorry you are angry at all black people. Having said the foregoing, I really only can think of one Asian CEO at a fortune 100, I think Pepsi but until
Now I never thought about it so I am sure there are more. Can you name any?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The law allows schools to have a diverse student body. You need to change the law.
The law allows schools to use racial discrimination in order to have a diverse student body.
Maybe if that were the official ruling, we can at least confront reality and move on with our lives.
I guess you should move on. Describe it as you wish but Harvard’s holistic admission process was found to be legal. The holistic admission standard has been ruled on in quite a few cases and it has been upheld repeatedly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The law allows schools to have a diverse student body. You need to change the law.
The law allows schools to use racial discrimination in order to have a diverse student body.
Maybe if that were the official ruling, we can at least confront reality and move on with our lives.
I guess you should move on. Describe it as you wish but Harvard’s holistic admission process was found to be legal. The holistic admission standard has been ruled on in quite a few cases and it has been upheld repeatedly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard ain’t all that.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/03/06/elite-college-degrees-give-black-graduates-little-advantage-job-market
This uses old data. You have proved nothing. Asian have the same barriers in corporate America. Your articles are coming. Blacks at elite schools do better than other blacks because they are still black. I don’t know why this concept is so hard for you to understand? But there are many more black senior managers in corporate America than Asian senior managers. Asian CEOs outside of Asian companies are not common and many Asian companies have Anglo CEOs.
There are now a number of blacks (mostly ivy alum) that are CEOs and a bunch of senior managers. Maybe you should examine some companies instead pulling up an article based on old date.
Can you name some?
Still waiting for names, especially ivy URM alum ceos.
CEO of Merck, TIAA, Amex, Former Xerox, Vista Equity and lots of senior execs and professionals
Ok that’s 4. Four out of literally thousands of US corporations gets you <1% of CEOs. And which ones are Ivy URM alums?
And who are these, “...and lots of senior execs and professionals“?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The law allows schools to have a diverse student body. You need to change the law.
The law allows schools to use racial discrimination in order to have a diverse student body.
Maybe if that were the official ruling, we can at least confront reality and move on with our lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard ain’t all that.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/03/06/elite-college-degrees-give-black-graduates-little-advantage-job-market
This uses old data. You have proved nothing. Asian have the same barriers in corporate America. Your articles are coming. Blacks at elite schools do better than other blacks because they are still black. I don’t know why this concept is so hard for you to understand? But there are many more black senior managers in corporate America than Asian senior managers. Asian CEOs outside of Asian companies are not common and many Asian companies have Anglo CEOs.
There are now a number of blacks (mostly ivy alum) that are CEOs and a bunch of senior managers. Maybe you should examine some companies instead pulling up an article based on old date.
Can you name some?
Still waiting for names, especially ivy URM alum ceos.
CEO of Merck, TIAA, Amex, Former Xerox, Vista Equity and lots of senior execs and professionals
Anonymous wrote:The law allows schools to have a diverse student body. You need to change the law.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard ain’t all that.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/03/06/elite-college-degrees-give-black-graduates-little-advantage-job-market
This uses old data. You have proved nothing. Asian have the same barriers in corporate America. Your articles are coming. Blacks at elite schools do better than other blacks because they are still black. I don’t know why this concept is so hard for you to understand? But there are many more black senior managers in corporate America than Asian senior managers. Asian CEOs outside of Asian companies are not common and many Asian companies have Anglo CEOs.
There are now a number of blacks (mostly ivy alum) that are CEOs and a bunch of senior managers. Maybe you should examine some companies instead pulling up an article based on old date.
Can you name some?
Still waiting for names, especially ivy URM alum ceos.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard ain’t all that.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/03/06/elite-college-degrees-give-black-graduates-little-advantage-job-market
This uses old data. You have proved nothing. Asian have the same barriers in corporate America. Your articles are coming. Blacks at elite schools do better than other blacks because they are still black. I don’t know why this concept is so hard for you to understand? But there are many more black senior managers in corporate America than Asian senior managers. Asian CEOs outside of Asian companies are not common and many Asian companies have Anglo CEOs.
There are now a number of blacks (mostly ivy alum) that are CEOs and a bunch of senior managers. Maybe you should examine some companies instead pulling up an article based on old date.
Can you name some?
Anonymous wrote:
It’s discrimination because Harvard is not all Asian? That is not what the court ruled. Maybe you can get a lobbyist and change the law. Some kids who are black, white and Asian are qualified and get rejected. A lot of kid actually. It’s a crapshoot. I will tell you who does get in people with a lot of $$$ and famous parents. That is life. There are also poor kids with multiple hardships of every race that have lower scores that get in. I guess that bother you too.
Anonymous wrote:If you “normalize” the test scores As part of a holistic admissions process how is that unfair? If anything it is an attempt to make it fair.
A 34 ACT and 104 weight GPA from one kid with every advantage in the world vs a 30 ACT and a 98 weighted GPA with every disadvantage in the world which is bigger accomplishment?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harvard ain’t all that.
https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/03/06/elite-college-degrees-give-black-graduates-little-advantage-job-market
Then why do you care?