Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

"Russian Collusion" was not a false attack. Mueller could not come to a conclusion, but he couldn't rule it out. So, it's not false.

It was based on a false premise. Period. There was no collusion. Except of course from the Clinton campaign and the DNC who paid for Russian disinformation. And, oddly, Mueller chose not to include that in his investigation. Wonder why?

The Stone warrants show that Trump's campaign was awash in foreign influence. Illicit foreign influence. Flynn was a part of that.

Anonymous wrote:

"Russian Collusion" was not a false attack. Mueller could not come to a conclusion, but he couldn't rule it out. So, it's not false.

It was based on a false premise. Period. There was no collusion. Except of course from the Clinton campaign and the DNC who paid for Russian disinformation. And, oddly, Mueller chose not to include that in his investigation. Wonder why?

"Russian Collusion" was not a false attack. Mueller could not come to a conclusion, but he couldn't rule it out. So, it's not false.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The sentencing memo doesn't say that they are not charging him with more serious crimes because of his cooperation. It says that his cooperation warrants a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines for what he was charged with.

And, how many were charged as a result? This was just whitewash.

Whitewash? What?

He was offered a Cooperation Agreement, which are agreements that are offered to criminals. He accepted, since he's a criminal, but he didn't really provide much help to the government. Nonetheless, they weren't going to argue for an increased sentence. Up until he went full Sidney Powell.

Really? The sentencing memo describes "substantial assistance" in the request for a downward departure in sentencing.

Yes, the government is being awfully nice to him. Aren't they?

The government recommends but doesn't decided the sentence. The judge does that.

I know that. But, it is disingenuous to say that Flynn did not provide much help, when the prosecutors said that he did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The sentencing memo doesn't say that they are not charging him with more serious crimes because of his cooperation. It says that his cooperation warrants a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines for what he was charged with.

And, how many were charged as a result? This was just whitewash.

Whitewash? What?

He was offered a Cooperation Agreement, which are agreements that are offered to criminals. He accepted, since he's a criminal, but he didn't really provide much help to the government. Nonetheless, they weren't going to argue for an increased sentence. Up until he went full Sidney Powell.

No. The whole thing was based on a false attack. Russian Collusion. Catching him in a lie (which the FBI originally said was not a lite) was the only thing they had on him. But, that would have looked silly--especially after they got him fired. Cooperation was an excuse to act like they were being altruistic. The people on the Mueller team should be investigated. It appears they withheld exculpatory materials from Flynn. That is illegal.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The sentencing memo doesn't say that they are not charging him with more serious crimes because of his cooperation. It says that his cooperation warrants a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines for what he was charged with.

And, how many were charged as a result? This was just whitewash.

Whitewash? What?

He was offered a Cooperation Agreement, which are agreements that are offered to criminals. He accepted, since he's a criminal, but he didn't really provide much help to the government. Nonetheless, they weren't going to argue for an increased sentence. Up until he went full Sidney Powell.

Really? The sentencing memo describes "substantial assistance" in the request for a downward departure in sentencing.

Yes, the government is being awfully nice to him. Aren't they?

The government recommends but doesn't decided the sentence. The judge does that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The sentencing memo doesn't say that they are not charging him with more serious crimes because of his cooperation. It says that his cooperation warrants a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines for what he was charged with.

And, how many were charged as a result? This was just whitewash.

Whitewash? What?

He was offered a Cooperation Agreement, which are agreements that are offered to criminals. He accepted, since he's a criminal, but he didn't really provide much help to the government. Nonetheless, they weren't going to argue for an increased sentence. Up until he went full Sidney Powell.

Really? The sentencing memo describes "substantial assistance" in the request for a downward departure in sentencing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The sentencing memo doesn't say that they are not charging him with more serious crimes because of his cooperation. It says that his cooperation warrants a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines for what he was charged with.

And, how many were charged as a result? This was just whitewash.

Whitewash? What?

He was offered a Cooperation Agreement, which are agreements that are offered to criminals. He accepted, since he's a criminal, but he didn't really provide much help to the government. Nonetheless, they weren't going to argue for an increased sentence. Up until he went full Sidney Powell.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The sentencing memo doesn't say that they are not charging him with more serious crimes because of his cooperation. It says that his cooperation warrants a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines for what he was charged with.

And, how many were charged as a result? This was just whitewash.

Whitewash? What?

He was offered a Cooperation Agreement, which are agreements that are offered to criminals. He accepted, since he's a criminal, but he didn't really provide much help to the government. Nonetheless, they weren't going to argue for an increased sentence. Up until he went full Sidney Powell.

No. The whole thing was based on a false attack. Russian Collusion. Catching him in a lie (which the FBI originally said was not a lite) was the only thing they had on him. But, that would have looked silly--especially after they got him fired. Cooperation was an excuse to act like they were being altruistic. The people on the Mueller team should be investigated. It appears they withheld exculpatory materials from Flynn. That is illegal.

Anonymous wrote:Well, that's real encouraging to know that our FBI agents at the top level would rather entrap someone in a lie than get to the truth.

I don't believe that is everyday actions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

The sentencing memo doesn't say that they are not charging him with more serious crimes because of his cooperation. It says that his cooperation warrants a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines for what he was charged with.

And, how many were charged as a result? This was just whitewash.

Whitewash? What?

He was offered a Cooperation Agreement, which are agreements that are offered to criminals. He accepted, since he's a criminal, but he didn't really provide much help to the government. Nonetheless, they weren't going to argue for an increased sentence. Up until he went full Sidney Powell.

Anonymous wrote:

The sentencing memo doesn't say that they are not charging him with more serious crimes because of his cooperation. It says that his cooperation warrants a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines for what he was charged with.

And, how many were charged as a result? This was just whitewash.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is the proper take

Nice spin.

Nope, these are facts. The "spin" is the idea that Flynn is an upstanding citizen who got railroaded by the FBI.

Anonymous wrote:

The sentencing memo doesn't say that they are not charging him with more serious crimes because of his cooperation. It says that his cooperation warrants a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines for what he was charged with.

And, how many were charged as a result? This was just whitewash.