Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.
She won't.
She will just use them as the excuse to raise taxes, substantially, on the middle and middle upper class. That's where the easy-to-tax salary money is.
of course
She won’t. Unless you make over $50 mill a year; that’s not really the upper middle class though.
LOL. Sure.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.
She won't.
She will just use them as the excuse to raise taxes, substantially, on the middle and middle upper class. That's where the easy-to-tax salary money is.
of course
She won’t. Unless you make over $50 mill a year; that’s not really the upper middle class though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.
She won't.
She will just use them as the excuse to raise taxes, substantially, on the middle and middle upper class. That's where the easy-to-tax salary money is.
of course
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.
She won't.
She will just use them as the excuse to raise taxes, substantially, on the middle and middle upper class. That's where the easy-to-tax salary money is.
Anonymous wrote:Amazing. Predict it now has her buy price at 44 vs Biden's 26. A difference of 18
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She has to lie about her crowds
![]()
She stated 15,000 at a rally recently and evidence shows only about 1590 showed up. Meanwhile in a blue state of NM Trump numbers are 45k tickets, 94% in state purchases, 78% of registrants matched voter files, 20% voted in one or less of the last four elections, 52% female 48% female (sorry not sorry liberals, only two genders so....) 40% LATINO and 31% registered Democrats.
These numbers are staggering and it shows Trump's support gaining. After fake Russia stories, Kavanaugh BS, fake dossiers and now things like McCabe possibly being charged it's only going to get better for him.
1. I understand from Sean Spicer that it’s not lying about crowd size if you really think the crowd was big.
2. According to you there’s just one sex, female and female.
3. Those numbers aren’t really staggering, even in a blue state.
4. Where do you see his support gaining?
I want to see you gnashing your teeth when Warren wins in 2020.
Anonymous wrote:She has to lie about her crowds
![]()
She stated 15,000 at a rally recently and evidence shows only about 1590 showed up. Meanwhile in a blue state of NM Trump numbers are 45k tickets, 94% in state purchases, 78% of registrants matched voter files, 20% voted in one or less of the last four elections, 52% female 48% female (sorry not sorry liberals, only two genders so....) 40% LATINO and 31% registered Democrats.
These numbers are staggering and it shows Trump's support gaining. After fake Russia stories, Kavanaugh BS, fake dossiers and now things like McCabe possibly being charged it's only going to get better for him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:New Florida polling shows Warren and Trump in a tie
https://business.fau.edu/departments/economics/business-economics-polling/bepi-polls/
Biden v Trump, Trump is ahead by +1
Well this is bad for Trump. Can he win without FL?
Anonymous wrote:New Florida polling shows Warren and Trump in a tie
https://business.fau.edu/departments/economics/business-economics-polling/bepi-polls/
Biden v Trump, Trump is ahead by +1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.
Like a Harvard Professor: despite whatever noise she makes, she’ll support $$$ in the end.
Why would she? She never has before and her campaign relies on small dollar contributions, not contributions from corporations. Why would she be beholden to them if they gave her nothing?
Her actual history is *much more* mixed than her propaganda.
True words
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In all seriousness, how would she address offshore tax havens and all those writeoffs that the megarich use? Example Epstein.
Like a Harvard Professor: despite whatever noise she makes, she’ll support $$$ in the end.
Why would she? She never has before and her campaign relies on small dollar contributions, not contributions from corporations. Why would she be beholden to them if they gave her nothing?
Her actual history is *much more* mixed than her propaganda.
Anonymous wrote:She has to lie about her crowds
![]()
She stated 15,000 at a rally recently and evidence shows only about 1590 showed up. Meanwhile in a blue state of NM Trump numbers are 45k tickets, 94% in state purchases, 78% of registrants matched voter files, 20% voted in one or less of the last four elections, 52% female 48% female (sorry not sorry liberals, only two genders so....) 40% LATINO and 31% registered Democrats.
These numbers are staggering and it shows Trump's support gaining. After fake Russia stories, Kavanaugh BS, fake dossiers and now things like McCabe possibly being charged it's only going to get better for him.