Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not about the behavior of the kids. It’s about the reporting done by the post. It was very poor, and ultimately damaging to Sandmann because of how the post chose to report.
It has to be answered for.

This, exactly. The Post ran with the false story that the kids - specifically Sandmann - were the antagonists. The exact opposite is true. The Post maligned Sandmann and should be held accountable.

Do you even read the Post? Doesn't sound like it.

Used to, until we decided it was time to end our subscription. We have no patience with a “news source” that injects its own bias into every story it covers. Enjoy. It’s clearly right up your alley.

Same here

For a liberal source, it did a lot of teacher bashing.

- two-teacher HH

related to the Covington brats?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That POS kid deserves it. Every school, employer, and potential girlfriend should receive a copy of that shameful photo.

You mean the photo of a kid smiling pleasantly and maintaining eye contact as an adult bangs a drum and chants in his face? That photo? Yeah, the only thing shameful in it is the adult who targeted the kid and won’t leave him alone.

He could have walked away
He was being a jerk

Catholic private school, exclusive and private. Bussed by teachers to protest abortion.
Not bussed by teachers to see and visit the city.
Raised to be idiots, not well mannered gentlemen, idiots for sure. Makes you think that they are products of the environment and backward wealthy white subculture out in West

The post reported that they harassed and blocked the path of a Native American elder. Jerks or not, that didn’t happen.

I suppose we'll find out if that is defamatory.

At the very least, it was a lie. I wonder if Phillips can be sued for defamation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That POS kid deserves it. Every school, employer, and potential girlfriend should receive a copy of that shameful photo.

You mean the photo of a kid smiling pleasantly and maintaining eye contact as an adult bangs a drum and chants in his face? That photo? Yeah, the only thing shameful in it is the adult who targeted the kid and won’t leave him alone.

He could have walked away
He was being a jerk

Catholic private school, exclusive and private. Bussed by teachers to protest abortion.
Not bussed by teachers to see and visit the city.
Raised to be idiots, not well mannered gentlemen, idiots for sure. Makes you think that they are products of the environment and backward wealthy white subculture out in West

The post reported that they harassed and blocked the path of a Native American elder. Jerks or not, that didn’t happen.

It is irrelevant that they are Catholic. Your bigotry and hatred are showing.
It is irrelevant what they were there for. I don't think the Native American's or Black Israelites were there to "see the city", either.
Did you see the part of the video were Sandmann was actually trying to stop one of the kids from engaging with Phillips while he was beating his drum and chanting? I guess not. If you think the kids are "idiots", please give your description of the adults (NA's, BI's) involved. I'm all ears.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That POS kid deserves it. Every school, employer, and potential girlfriend should receive a copy of that shameful photo.

You mean the photo of a kid smiling pleasantly and maintaining eye contact as an adult bangs a drum and chants in his face? That photo? Yeah, the only thing shameful in it is the adult who targeted the kid and won’t leave him alone.

He could have walked away
He was being a jerk

Catholic private school, exclusive and private. Bussed by teachers to protest abortion.
Not bussed by teachers to see and visit the city.
Raised to be idiots, not well mannered gentlemen, idiots for sure. Makes you think that they are products of the environment and backward wealthy white subculture out in West

The post reported that they harassed and blocked the path of a Native American elder. Jerks or not, that didn’t happen.

I suppose we'll find out if that is defamatory.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That POS kid deserves it. Every school, employer, and potential girlfriend should receive a copy of that shameful photo.

You mean the photo of a kid smiling pleasantly and maintaining eye contact as an adult bangs a drum and chants in his face? That photo? Yeah, the only thing shameful in it is the adult who targeted the kid and won’t leave him alone.

He could have walked away
He was being a jerk

Catholic private school, exclusive and private. Bussed by teachers to protest abortion.
Not bussed by teachers to see and visit the city.
Raised to be idiots, not well mannered gentlemen, idiots for sure. Makes you think that they are products of the environment and backward wealthy white subculture out in West

The post reported that they harassed and blocked the path of a Native American elder. Jerks or not, that didn’t happen.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That POS kid deserves it. Every school, employer, and potential girlfriend should receive a copy of that shameful photo.

You mean the photo of a kid smiling pleasantly and maintaining eye contact as an adult bangs a drum and chants in his face? That photo? Yeah, the only thing shameful in it is the adult who targeted the kid and won’t leave him alone.

He could have walked away
He was being a jerk

Catholic private school, exclusive and private. Bussed by teachers to protest abortion.
Not bussed by teachers to see and visit the city.
Raised to be idiots, not well mannered gentlemen, idiots for sure. Makes you think that they are products of the environment and backward wealthy white subculture out in West

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not about the behavior of the kids. It’s about the reporting done by the post. It was very poor, and ultimately damaging to Sandmann because of how the post chose to report.
It has to be answered for.

This, exactly. The Post ran with the false story that the kids - specifically Sandmann - were the antagonists. The exact opposite is true. The Post maligned Sandmann and should be held accountable.

Do you even read the Post? Doesn't sound like it.

Used to, until we decided it was time to end our subscription. We have no patience with a “news source” that injects its own bias into every story it covers. Enjoy. It’s clearly right up your alley.

Same here

For a liberal source, it did a lot of teacher bashing.

- two-teacher HH

Anonymous wrote:The kid is a douche and so are his trashy parents. Best of luck taking on WaPo.

CLOWN SHOW

+1

Chaperones should have kept the baby BKs under control.

Anonymous wrote:The kid is a douche and so are his trashy parents. Best of luck taking on WaPo.

CLOWN SHOW

I would say all of the above is true about you and anyone else berating a kid for doing nothing wrong while the adults around him act like morons.

The kid is a douche and so are his trashy parents. Best of luck taking on WaPo.

CLOWN SHOW

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not about the behavior of the kids. It’s about the reporting done by the post. It was very poor, and ultimately damaging to Sandmann because of how the post chose to report.
It has to be answered for.

This, exactly. The Post ran with the false story that the kids - specifically Sandmann - were the antagonists. The exact opposite is true. The Post maligned Sandmann and should be held accountable.

Do you even read the Post? Doesn't sound like it.

Used to, until we decided it was time to end our subscription. We have no patience with a “news source” that injects its own bias into every story it covers. Enjoy. It’s clearly right up your alley.

You can't tell opinion articles from reporting?

Sorry. That sounds tough.

Sorry. The original article was not an opinion article. Even the half a$$ retraction published on March 1 clearly refers to "reporting". Try again.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not about the behavior of the kids. It’s about the reporting done by the post. It was very poor, and ultimately damaging to Sandmann because of how the post chose to report.
It has to be answered for.

This, exactly. The Post ran with the false story that the kids - specifically Sandmann - were the antagonists. The exact opposite is true. The Post maligned Sandmann and should be held accountable.

Do you even read the Post? Doesn't sound like it.

Used to, until we decided it was time to end our subscription. We have no patience with a “news source” that injects its own bias into every story it covers. Enjoy. It’s clearly right up your alley.

You can't tell opinion articles from reporting?

Sorry. That sounds tough.

Actually, it sounds like you’re having difficulty with that distinction. Hint: news reports should carry not even a whiff of bias. The Post can’t even manage that.

(Cue the predictable whataboutism).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not about the behavior of the kids. It’s about the reporting done by the post. It was very poor, and ultimately damaging to Sandmann because of how the post chose to report.
It has to be answered for.

This, exactly. The Post ran with the false story that the kids - specifically Sandmann - were the antagonists. The exact opposite is true. The Post maligned Sandmann and should be held accountable.

Do you even read the Post? Doesn't sound like it.

Used to, until we decided it was time to end our subscription. We have no patience with a “news source” that injects its own bias into every story it covers. Enjoy. It’s clearly right up your alley.

You can't tell opinion articles from reporting?

Sorry. That sounds tough.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s not about the behavior of the kids. It’s about the reporting done by the post. It was very poor, and ultimately damaging to Sandmann because of how the post chose to report.
It has to be answered for.

This, exactly. The Post ran with the false story that the kids - specifically Sandmann - were the antagonists. The exact opposite is true. The Post maligned Sandmann and should be held accountable.

Do you even read the Post? Doesn't sound like it.

Used to, until we decided it was time to end our subscription. We have no patience with a “news source” that injects its own bias into every story it covers. Enjoy. It’s clearly right up your alley.

Anonymous wrote:That POS kid deserves it. Every school, employer, and potential girlfriend should receive a copy of that shameful photo.

You mean the photo of a kid smiling pleasantly and maintaining eye contact as an adult bangs a drum and chants in his face? That photo? Yeah, the only thing shameful in it is the adult who targeted the kid and won’t leave him alone.