Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

The rich go to Morocco and the Amalfi Coast.

Ive been to Morocco, Amalfi and Portugal. What does that make me?
Why the hate on Portugal?

No one is hating on Portugal. Identifying it as UMC is not hate. On the contrary, UMC are the most adventurous. Now, you mocked my class and called me a Trump supporter, which makes me question your own class security. Portugal can be a fine destination without the rich flocking to it.

DP. How do you know PP called you a Trump supporter? I'm not following.

She responded to me and called me a trump supporter. Look upthread. I'm the one who wrote a profile of each class.

Oh, okay.

Can you give us a rundown on the yachting/beach locales of the rich vs. UMC? For example, Bahamas, etc.

Yachting tends to be for the rich, whereas sailing is UMC.

Beaches for the rich- their own beach house, south of France, Maldives, Cayman (esp for scuba enthusiasts), St Lucia, Tahiti

UMC- Aruba, Florida (esp Amelia Island), Mexico (although that is falling to the MC), Hilton Head Island. The UMC take a dim view of all inclusives and avoid islands where they are prevalent.

Bahamas is MC unless you're staying on a water vessel or at a rented, upscale house.

Domestically, Florida tends to attract more UMC while California tends to attract the rich (esp around Carmel, Pebble Beach, Malibu, etc).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

The rich go to Morocco and the Amalfi Coast.

Ive been to Morocco, Amalfi and Portugal. What does that make me?
Why the hate on Portugal?

No one is hating on Portugal. Identifying it as UMC is not hate. On the contrary, UMC are the most adventurous. Now, you mocked my class and called me a Trump supporter, which makes me question your own class security. Portugal can be a fine destination without the rich flocking to it.

DP. How do you know PP called you a Trump supporter? I'm not following.

She responded to me and called me a trump supporter. Look upthread. I'm the one who wrote a profile of each class.

Oh, okay.

Can you give us a rundown on the yachting/beach locales of the rich vs. UMC? For example, Bahamas, etc.

For the Caribbean, the old money goes to Mill Reef, Caneel Bay, Round Hill or do a sailing charter in the BVIs. The nouveau riche go to St Bart’s or Anguilla - or anywhere else to be “seen.” Taking a cruise is the lowest of low classes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

The rich go to Morocco and the Amalfi Coast.

Ive been to Morocco, Amalfi and Portugal. What does that make me?
Why the hate on Portugal?

No one is hating on Portugal. Identifying it as UMC is not hate. On the contrary, UMC are the most adventurous. Now, you mocked my class and called me a Trump supporter, which makes me question your own class security. Portugal can be a fine destination without the rich flocking to it.

DP. How do you know PP called you a Trump supporter? I'm not following.

She responded to me and called me a trump supporter. Look upthread. I'm the one who wrote a profile of each class.

Oh, okay.

Can you give us a rundown on the yachting/beach locales of the rich vs. UMC? For example, Bahamas, etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

The rich go to Morocco and the Amalfi Coast.

Ive been to Morocco, Amalfi and Portugal. What does that make me?
Why the hate on Portugal?

No one is hating on Portugal. Identifying it as UMC is not hate. On the contrary, UMC are the most adventurous. Now, you mocked my class and called me a Trump supporter, which makes me question your own class security. Portugal can be a fine destination without the rich flocking to it.

DP. How do you know PP called you a Trump supporter? I'm not following.

She responded to me and called me a trump supporter. Look upthread. I'm the one who wrote a profile of each class.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

The rich go to Morocco and the Amalfi Coast.

Ive been to Morocco, Amalfi and Portugal. What does that make me?
Why the hate on Portugal?

No one is hating on Portugal. Identifying it as UMC is not hate. On the contrary, UMC are the most adventurous. Now, you mocked my class and called me a Trump supporter, which makes me question your own class security. Portugal can be a fine destination without the rich flocking to it.

DP. How do you know PP called you a Trump supporter? I'm not following.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

The rich go to Morocco and the Amalfi Coast.

Ive been to Morocco, Amalfi and Portugal. What does that make me?
Why the hate on Portugal?

No one is hating on Portugal. Identifying it as UMC is not hate. On the contrary, UMC are the most adventurous. Now, you mocked my class and called me a Trump supporter, which makes me question your own class security. Portugal can be a fine destination without the rich flocking to it.

If you abuse people on social media, like you did the previous page, you get called a Trump supporter. That’s just how it works.

Of course the rich go to Jerez for the sherry makers, and they stop by that famous horse school to make the kids happy.

Saying that Portugal is not a destination for the rich is not abuse. In fact, from a WC perspective, the class connotations of a destination is immaterial. The only relevant isse is whether you like it. Believing that being correctly pegged as MC or UMC is insultiing is extremely middle class. If you are looking to improve your social standing, stop looking for validation of your choices.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

This is a very strange comment. You think rich people do not go to Portugal?

Certainly some rich people will go to Portugal. But the most likely traveler to Portugal will be UMC. Reasons for this- 1) Portugal's reputation as a budget destination, and 2) its relative obscurity makes the UMC traveler feel like they've conquered the hinterlands.

No. It is in Western Europe. It is just a cool country. And manageable for a fairly short trip. It is not obscure at all.

That's your view. It's still true that Portugal became a common destination among the UMC when the euro hit a high, and jet fuel prices were surging. So there's a correlation there. I've never known truly wealthy people to vacation there. That doesn't make it a bad destination. As I have said, I am WC, so calm down. Are you middle class? Relax. Try meditation. All the UMCers are doing it, as you know.

DP. I’m sure you know your snark is Trump-like, I mean, working class.

Lots of people, rich and poor, go to Portugal after they’ve done London, Paris, Rome, Amsterdam, and Madrid. It’s a nice place to visit.

"Doing" Paris, London, Rome etc sounds MC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

The rich go to Morocco and the Amalfi Coast.

Ive been to Morocco, Amalfi and Portugal. What does that make me?
Why the hate on Portugal?

No one is hating on Portugal. Identifying it as UMC is not hate. On the contrary, UMC are the most adventurous. Now, you mocked my class and called me a Trump supporter, which makes me question your own class security. Portugal can be a fine destination without the rich flocking to it.

If you abuse people on social media, like you did the previous page, you get called a Trump supporter. That’s just how it works.

Of course the rich go to Jerez for the sherry makers, and they stop by that famous horse school to make the kids happy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

The rich go to Morocco and the Amalfi Coast.

Ive been to Morocco, Amalfi and Portugal. What does that make me?
Why the hate on Portugal?

No one is hating on Portugal. Identifying it as UMC is not hate. On the contrary, UMC are the most adventurous. Now, you mocked my class and called me a Trump supporter, which makes me question your own class security. Portugal can be a fine destination without the rich flocking to it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the most asinine threads I have read here. And that is a very high bar. Well done!

you are welcome to read another thread somewhere else

It is such a disaster that I cannot look away.

Someone uses the ginormous, honking plastic thing with rabbit ears to open her wine bottles. It’s a family tradition, they haul it out for all the major holidays.

And now he’ll never look at it the same way again. But he doesn’t know how to explain that to the family.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the most asinine threads I have read here. And that is a very high bar. Well done!

you are welcome to read another thread somewhere else

It is such a disaster that I cannot look away.

Someone uses the ginormous, honking plastic thing with rabbit ears to open her wine bottles. It’s a family tradition, they haul it out for all the major holidays.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My take on OP's post had more to do with what people choose given what the means they have than what their means are. TV and bar cart vs piano and books--exactly. The piano may me a 1900 upright instead of a Steinway baby grand, and the books may be from a thrift store but carefully selected.

OP here. Yes, this was what I was trying to explore. Should have known the DCUM crowd would devolve into arguing about private schools and tax brackets.

Agree on the distinctions. Here’s another: when you go to Portugal, is that to hang out on the beaches or to visit the museums and sip sherry?

I hate to say this, though, but I think these are distinctions between MC and UMC. Old money where there’s still lots of money have a family grand piano, but nobody can play it well.

I don’t understand the Portugal part. Most people hit the beaches and museums n

The rich don't go to Portugal. The UMC goes. MC doesn't. So this comment is odd.

The rich go to Morocco and the Amalfi Coast.

Ive been to Morocco, Amalfi and Portugal. What does that make me?
Why the hate on Portugal?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the most asinine threads I have read here. And that is a very high bar. Well done!

you are welcome to read another thread somewhere else

It is such a disaster that I cannot look away.

Anonymous wrote:This is one of the most asinine threads I have read here. And that is a very high bar. Well done!

you are welcome to read another thread somewhere else

Class is very different than wealth! I grew up lower middle class from a wealth standpoint but my parents raised us with class and good manners! The most important things they taught me were to get as much education as possible because nobody can take away your education and give because it is the right thing to do (we gave anonymously). We did not have designer things but we were always to be clean and presentable and that meant our clothing was ironed etc.
The funny thing about this, is that to this day, people have always assumed that I came from a very wealthy family.