Anonymous wrote:First of all PAC is for bad players. The few good players always leave. ONLY go there if your alternative is Arlington bottom two teams and your DC is dead set on travel.
ADP is not going to set your kid back. If you want to get better at soccer, you should actually bypass every team at Arlington other than red and maybe white and do ADP. If your player has talent like the previous poster, then supplement ADP with good individual and small group training, during the year and in the off seasons. Play Super Y, not for Arlington, but.a different club. Don't get caught up into the No Man's Land of a blue or black team. That's a waste. You will have more fun and get more development with less travel in ADP + Xtra programming, and if you your kid wants to play U13 soccer and above as a teenager, then you will be able to break in. Don't listen to any of these people who tell you otherwise. Club soccer is not going to even make the best red team player better. It is up to your and your DC.
ADP is one of the best programs inside the Beltway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^well-known Type A Arlington parent strategy.
Start ‘em in travel in first/second grade to get ‘em seen.
anyone see the k'garteners at the girls u9 tryouts?!
It's playing up one year. Blame USA soccer for requiring 1st graders to try out now for travel.
Blame parents for demanding that their kids be on “teams”. From rec and having the friends all play together (which is all good) but then after that the fix is always in. Instead of understanding and Academy style process and trusting it parents become obsessed with rosters and who is on or not on the team. Then is the A team or B team. These are all the fault of parents who either seek status or to shield their child from competing by social engineering rosters that keep everyone comfortable. Go read the Arlington Red/DA thread to see this at play. You have parents conspiring to try and keep “their team” together versus making the right soccer decision for their kid. It is all about the “team” and maintaining the team’s status quo. This is not the fault of US Soccer but the fault of parents.
Anonymous wrote:First of all PAC is for bad players. The few good players always leave. ONLY go there if your alternative is Arlington bottom two teams and your DC is dead set on travel.
ADP is not going to set your kid back. If you want to get better at soccer, you should actually bypass every team at Arlington other than red and maybe white and do ADP. If your player has talent like the previous poster, then supplement ADP with good individual and small group training, during the year and in the off seasons. Play Super Y, not for Arlington, but.a different club. Don't get caught up into the No Man's Land of a blue or black team. That's a waste. You will have more fun and get more development with less travel in ADP + Xtra programming, and if you your kid wants to play U13 soccer and above as a teenager, then you will be able to break in. Don't listen to any of these people who tell you otherwise. Club soccer is not going to even make the best red team player better. It is up to your and your DC.
ADP is one of the best programs inside the Beltway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^well-known Type A Arlington parent strategy.
Start ‘em in travel in first/second grade to get ‘em seen.
anyone see the k'garteners at the girls u9 tryouts?!
It's playing up one year. Blame USA soccer for requiring 1st graders to try out now for travel.
Blame parents for demanding that their kids be on “teams”. From rec and having the friends all play together (which is all good) but then after that the fix is always in. Instead of understanding and Academy style process and trusting it parents become obsessed with rosters and who is on or not on the team. Then is the A team or B team. These are all the fault of parents who either seek status or to shield their child from competing by social engineering rosters that keep everyone comfortable. Go read the Arlington Red/DA thread to see this at play. You have parents conspiring to try and keep “their team” together versus making the right soccer decision for their kid. It is all about the “team” and maintaining the team’s status quo. This is not the fault of US Soccer but the fault of parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^well-known Type A Arlington parent strategy.
Start ‘em in travel in first/second grade to get ‘em seen.
anyone see the k'garteners at the girls u9 tryouts?!
It's playing up one year. Blame USA soccer for requiring 1st graders to try out now for travel.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^well-known Type A Arlington parent strategy.
Start ‘em in travel in first/second grade to get ‘em seen.
anyone see the k'garteners at the girls u9 tryouts?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:re: the white tryout shirt. If they specify a white shirt, buy a $4 shirt at Michael's and have your kid wear it. At one of the tryouts last year, every single girl had on the white shirt except one girl wearing a bright pink shirt. I was torn between feeling sorry for her and wondering if her parents were either too lazy to read or were trying to get her to stand out from the pack. The whole point of the white shirt is that every kid is supposed to look the same and they have to stand out on their own merits. If your kid got a spot because a coach remembered her due to her shirt, that's unfair to kids whose parents followed the rules.
Sorry.
LOL, no kid ever lost a spot to a player who was wearing a bright shirt. It just makes it easier if everyone is wearing a single color for when they scrimmage and one team wears pinnies. It is easier for the players too in order to distinguish "teammates" during scrimmages and drills.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:re: the white tryout shirt. If they specify a white shirt, buy a $4 shirt at Michael's and have your kid wear it. At one of the tryouts last year, every single girl had on the white shirt except one girl wearing a bright pink shirt. I was torn between feeling sorry for her and wondering if her parents were either too lazy to read or were trying to get her to stand out from the pack. The whole point of the white shirt is that every kid is supposed to look the same and they have to stand out on their own merits. If your kid got a spot because a coach remembered her due to her shirt, that's unfair to kids whose parents followed the rules.
Sorry.
LOL, no kid ever lost a spot to a player who was wearing a bright shirt. It just makes it easier if everyone is wearing a single color for when they scrimmage and one team wears pinnies. It is easier for the players too in order to distinguish "teammates" during scrimmages and drills.
Anonymous wrote:
Post 05/04/2018 11:26 Subject: Re:Spring Travel Soccer Tryouts 2018
Anonymous wrote:
My understanding (from a parent of boy on one of their U10 teams) is that they are not having open try outs - just player IDs through practices. Supposedly offers will go out next week so if you want to schedule a time for your son to drop in on a practice you might want to arrange that ASAP.
so it sounds like they have their teams are set only adding a few new players thru ID practices ? guessing no open tryouts means they want to fill voids of departing players? how do they run things under their new philosophy (ECNL) separate elite, blue , and white teams or a weekly player pool ?
Yes, it would seem that way (just filling vacant spots). Not sure about how they run things (we are not in BRYC) but I do know that there are two teams of U10B (which I believe are elite?) and that the blue/white teams seem to be run out of the Rec side. Take what I say with a grain of salt - I am sure there are others on this forum much more well-versed in BRYC.
On the Elite academy side the teams are broken down elite and blue for the first two teams and white if the have enough kids to field a third team. black and silver are use on the rec side. I think BRYC has a solid program maybe spread a little thin in coaching by looking at their website.
Anonymous wrote:re: the white tryout shirt. If they specify a white shirt, buy a $4 shirt at Michael's and have your kid wear it. At one of the tryouts last year, every single girl had on the white shirt except one girl wearing a bright pink shirt. I was torn between feeling sorry for her and wondering if her parents were either too lazy to read or were trying to get her to stand out from the pack. The whole point of the white shirt is that every kid is supposed to look the same and they have to stand out on their own merits. If your kid got a spot because a coach remembered her due to her shirt, that's unfair to kids whose parents followed the rules.
Sorry.
Post 05/04/2018 11:26 Subject: Re:Spring Travel Soccer Tryouts 2018
Anonymous wrote:
My understanding (from a parent of boy on one of their U10 teams) is that they are not having open try outs - just player IDs through practices. Supposedly offers will go out next week so if you want to schedule a time for your son to drop in on a practice you might want to arrange that ASAP.
so it sounds like they have their teams are set only adding a few new players thru ID practices ? guessing no open tryouts means they want to fill voids of departing players? how do they run things under their new philosophy (ECNL) separate elite, blue , and white teams or a weekly player pool ?
Yes, it would seem that way (just filling vacant spots). Not sure about how they run things (we are not in BRYC) but I do know that there are two teams of U10B (which I believe are elite?) and that the blue/white teams seem to be run out of the Rec side. Take what I say with a grain of salt - I am sure there are others on this forum much more well-versed in BRYC.
Anonymous wrote:My understanding (from a parent of boy on one of their U10 teams) is that they are not having open try outs - just player IDs through practices. Supposedly offers will go out next week so if you want to schedule a time for your son to drop in on a practice you might want to arrange that ASAP.