Anonymous wrote:Pp, a friend of mine almost killed himself (now brain damaged) when he found out his father, who he admired, was having an affair. So, kids get hurt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
How would you feel if your dad divorced your mom and chose to cut contact with you because he wanted to give his other children a stable home?
What other children?
If he chose to remarry and have other children.
Children of marriage #1 do not threaten the stability of marriage #2, because a) there has been a formal marriage and divorce, b) wife #2 knew her husband was married before and had other children, there was no deception, and she was presumably fine with this when she married him. She went into this with her eyes open. These two scenarios are not anywhere comparable.
I am asking a specific PP whose dad does not speak with his son from his first marriage. PP and sibling are from second marriage.
I'm sure I would feel horrible. My point was to counter the earlier comment that ALL children are INCREDIBLY psychologically damaged by this. Well, I had no contact with my half sibling and I am not damaged by it in the slightest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
How would you feel if your dad divorced your mom and chose to cut contact with you because he wanted to give his other children a stable home?
What other children?
If he chose to remarry and have other children.
Children of marriage #1 do not threaten the stability of marriage #2, because a) there has been a formal marriage and divorce, b) wife #2 knew her husband was married before and had other children, there was no deception, and she was presumably fine with this when she married him. She went into this with her eyes open. These two scenarios are not anywhere comparable.
I am asking a specific PP whose dad does not speak with his son from his first marriage. PP and sibling are from second marriage.
I'm sure I would feel horrible. My point was to counter the earlier comment that ALL children are INCREDIBLY psychologically damaged by this. Well, I had no contact with my half sibling and I am not damaged by it in the slightest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
How would you feel if your dad divorced your mom and chose to cut contact with you because he wanted to give his other children a stable home?
What other children?
If he chose to remarry and have other children.
Children of marriage #1 do not threaten the stability of marriage #2, because a) there has been a formal marriage and divorce, b) wife #2 knew her husband was married before and had other children, there was no deception, and she was presumably fine with this when she married him. She went into this with her eyes open. These two scenarios are not anywhere comparable.
I am asking a specific PP whose dad does not speak with his son from his first marriage. PP and sibling are from second marriage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
How would you feel if your dad divorced your mom and chose to cut contact with you because he wanted to give his other children a stable home?
What other children?
If he chose to remarry and have other children.
Children of marriage #1 do not threaten the stability of marriage #2, because a) there has been a formal marriage and divorce, b) wife #2 knew her husband was married before and had other children, there was no deception, and she was presumably fine with this when she married him. She went into this with her eyes open. These two scenarios are not anywhere comparable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
How would you feel if your dad divorced your mom and chose to cut contact with you because he wanted to give his other children a stable home?
What other children?
If he chose to remarry and have other children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
How would you feel if your dad divorced your mom and chose to cut contact with you because he wanted to give his other children a stable home?
What other children?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
How would you feel if your dad divorced your mom and chose to cut contact with you because he wanted to give his other children a stable home?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
Nobody is saying you should.
We are saying that it takes a special kind of man to abandon his child, and it takes a special kind of woman to love that man.
We do not know the circumstances in your case((maybe the first wife wanted nothing to do with him?), so nobody is saying your father is that special kind of man.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?
You are right, I don't know. I can't fault my parents for giving me an intact, tranquil home.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like this thread is DCUM at its most batshit crazy. Can you guys hear yourself? "Separating a woman from her biological child is lethal but separating a man is merely painful"
Jeeeeesus. I've said it a few times in this thread but you are all about preserving the 'marriage' over basically everything else in the world. Including your own values, general morality, and a completely innocent baby's well being.
I also echo another PP. Apparently being married to a dead beat is ok with some of you as long as he never talks to his side piece again but in my world? Any man who has accepted that he is not allowed to see his own child, his own flesh and blood, is not the type of man I want to be married to. I would be absolutely disgusted.
I almost broke up with my DH when we were dating because HIS BROTHER had a baby in college with a girlfriend that he walked away from and the whole family seemed kind of ok with it. It was only until I talked to him about it more and learned that DH had kind of been keeping tabs on the girl and making sure she was alright that I thought he was ok. Walking away from a child is a horrific thing for an adult to do.
No one is about preserving the marriage over everything else. That type of infidelity shatters marriages and any woman who decides to divorce over this has my enthusiastic support. If this is not for you, it doesn't have to be!
For those who decide to try and rebuild the marriage, do you think they should NOT know about the scenarios that give them the best shot?
I want to address your comment I bolded above. There is no "general morality" about this. Until less than a hundred years ago, men were expected to ignore their illegitimate children. The idea that ALL children need to be embraced, much less prioritized, is a very new one. Don't oversell this as "general morality", because it isn't.
As for the wellbeing of an innocent baby, well of course it is important, but is it more important than everything else? More important than the wellbeing of the children of marriage? More important than the wellbeing of the wife? Why? They too are innocent so why should the baby be the priority to the detriment of everyone else?
Anonymous wrote:
I am not the "incredibly damaged" PP, but how do you know how incredibly damaged the son was? or does it not matter because you weren't incredibly damaged?