Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tattoos are a form of reverse virtue-signalling among the lower-middle and working classes. They are what they are.
You obviously don't know the same middle- and upper-middle class people that I do. Lots of folks in my social circle have tattoos, mostly artists and educators. It hasn't held us back in employment, social enjoyment, or earnings.
Lots of medical/hospital employees have them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tattoos are a form of reverse virtue-signalling among the lower-middle and working classes. They are what they are.
You obviously don't know the same middle- and upper-middle class people that I do. Lots of folks in my social circle have tattoos, mostly artists and educators. It hasn't held us back in employment, social enjoyment, or earnings.
Anonymous wrote:Tattoos are a form of reverse virtue-signalling among the lower-middle and working classes. They are what they are.
Anonymous wrote:Zero. When I was young I thought they were boarder line trashy, hard to pull off in a classy dress with tattoos and definitely not pretty on aging stretched out skin.
Anonymous wrote:being a pagan is sleazy too.
Anonymous wrote:I don't really understand why some people are so bothered by other people having tattoos. I think preppy Tory Birch & Lily Pulitzer types are tacky, trashy, and ugly as hell - but if you like it, you like it - different strokes for different folks. It doesn't mean I make judgments about your character.
Anonymous wrote:Funny you ask this. I just saw a shirt at the mall that said
Tattoed and employed
It made me laugh because all I could think about was "But where are you employed?" and the fact that you have to defend yourself speaks volumes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Funny you ask this. I just saw a shirt at the mall that said
Tattoed and employed
It made me laugh because all I could think about was "But where are you employed?" and the fact that you have to defend yourself speaks volumes.
Big law partner, just nothing visible in a suit