Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What babble. Those that like smaller houses like them today and may like them tomorrow. Same goes for larger homes. The preference for less space is generally a niche preference held by those who prefer to engage in other forms of conspicuous consumption and/or what has been aptly described as conspicuous compassion.
Wow, you really had to contort yourself there, didn't you.
Not a bit. PP was making a silly argument that at some future date, "people" will look around and prefer smaller to larger homes because of the extra green space.
Utter bullshit. Some people prefer smaller homes now, and will prefer them in the future. Others prefer larger homes now, and will prefer them in the future.
In general, "people" prefer additional space to living in cramped quarters. Some of those who prefer less space prefer to spend their money on other things like restaurants and travel, and others just like patting themselves on the back 24/7 for "living small." If you don't understand that, that's your problem.
3,500 sq ft is "cramped" for a family of four? Please tell me you hear how that sounds.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What I don't like is that all new builds are McMansions or multifamily units. You don't see starter homes being built any longer and that sucks.
I see lots of condos being built
Condos are multifamily homes which I addressed. Starter homes that are HOUSES are no longer built. The best you can find are some from the 80's and most in this region seem to be from the 40's-70's. You can't buy a new small SFH.
You're right. So many developers are buying up older, smaller SFHs that a lot of families would love to live in and then tear them down/replace them with giant mansions for the wealthy. Sure, families can buy starter condos, but when so many people aren't buying until their mid-30s, a condo doesn't seem as attractive. Not to mention, a lot of people still want the ability to buy a small detached home, but are getting pushed farther out to do so. What happens is you end up with a bunch of rich people, renters, and manadated affordable housing in places like N. Arlington. Regular middle class families just aren't buying there anymore and I see other areas in N. Virginia going in that same direction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What babble. Those that like smaller houses like them today and may like them tomorrow. Same goes for larger homes. The preference for less space is generally a niche preference held by those who prefer to engage in other forms of conspicuous consumption and/or what has been aptly described as conspicuous compassion.
Wow, you really had to contort yourself there, didn't you.
Not a bit. PP was making a silly argument that at some future date, "people" will look around and prefer smaller to larger homes because of the extra green space.
Utter bullshit. Some people prefer smaller homes now, and will prefer them in the future. Others prefer larger homes now, and will prefer them in the future.
In general, "people" prefer additional space to living in cramped quarters. Some of those who prefer less space prefer to spend their money on other things like restaurants and travel, and others just like patting themselves on the back 24/7 for "living small." If you don't understand that, that's your problem.
I do not get the impression that people in large houses do not go out to eat, or travel.
As for people who actually do have a smaller GHG footprint, you can tell yourself its about patting themselves on the back, but unfortunately the future of the planet is actually at issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
All those things could be achieved by upzoning to allow new townhouses. More tax revenues, younger families, greater demand to support retail. Plus you would have more density that could support transit more kids within walking distance, and more housing closer in for middle class people.
That's a different point, and you'd have people in older, smaller homes who also don't welcome new townhouses and greater density. You're just dealing with Venn diagrams of disgruntlement about change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What babble. Those that like smaller houses like them today and may like them tomorrow. Same goes for larger homes. The preference for less space is generally a niche preference held by those who prefer to engage in other forms of conspicuous consumption and/or what has been aptly described as conspicuous compassion.
Wow, you really had to contort yourself there, didn't you.
Not a bit. PP was making a silly argument that at some future date, "people" will look around and prefer smaller to larger homes because of the extra green space.
Utter bullshit. Some people prefer smaller homes now, and will prefer them in the future. Others prefer larger homes now, and will prefer them in the future.
In general, "people" prefer additional space to living in cramped quarters. Some of those who prefer less space prefer to spend their money on other things like restaurants and travel, and others just like patting themselves on the back 24/7 for "living small." If you don't understand that, that's your problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They have open floor plans, energy efficient features, and there's nothing to repair. Are "McMansions" all that bad?
Isn't it obvious OP? The jealousy is not obvious to you? It should be.
All of those things are awesome. I'd just rather own an older home that has been updated to have those things.
In my neighborhood people have blown out the back of their older homes- they have space and it looks great from the street.
That however can really break the bank. The new build is the " cheaper" option in most of these scenarios.
I am extremely doubtful it looks better from the street. Who is feeding you this BS? It looks more like a bunch of trailers half wittedly added on to an old house. Trailers beget more trailers.
If you ever have billions, which is doubtful, go ahead and buy whatever you want. No one cares. Really, it is going to be alright.
THIS IS HIDEOUS:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What babble. Those that like smaller houses like them today and may like them tomorrow. Same goes for larger homes. The preference for less space is generally a niche preference held by those who prefer to engage in other forms of conspicuous consumption and/or what has been aptly described as conspicuous compassion.
Wow, you really had to contort yourself there, didn't you.
Not a bit. PP was making a silly argument that at some future date, "people" will look around and prefer smaller to larger homes because of the extra green space.
Utter bullshit. Some people prefer smaller homes now, and will prefer them in the future. Others prefer larger homes now, and will prefer them in the future.
In general, "people" prefer additional space to living in cramped quarters. Some of those who prefer less space prefer to spend their money on other things like restaurants and travel, and others just like patting themselves on the back 24/7 for "living small." If you don't understand that, that's your problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What babble. Those that like smaller houses like them today and may like them tomorrow. Same goes for larger homes. The preference for less space is generally a niche preference held by those who prefer to engage in other forms of conspicuous consumption and/or what has been aptly described as conspicuous compassion.
Wow, you really had to contort yourself there, didn't you.
Not a bit. PP was making a silly argument that at some future date, "people" will look around and prefer smaller to larger homes because of the extra green space.
Utter bullshit. Some people prefer smaller homes now, and will prefer them in the future. Others prefer larger homes now, and will prefer them in the future.
In general, "people" prefer additional space to living in cramped quarters. Some of those who prefer less space prefer to spend their money on other things like restaurants and travel, and others just like patting themselves on the back 24/7 for "living small." If you don't understand that, that's your problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What babble. Those that like smaller houses like them today and may like them tomorrow. Same goes for larger homes. The preference for less space is generally a niche preference held by those who prefer to engage in other forms of conspicuous consumption and/or what has been aptly described as conspicuous compassion.
Wow, you really had to contort yourself there, didn't you.
Not a bit. PP was making a silly argument that at some future date, "people" will look around and prefer smaller to larger homes because of the extra green space.
Utter bullshit. Some people prefer smaller homes now, and will prefer them in the future. Others prefer larger homes now, and will prefer them in the future.
In general, "people" prefer additional space to living in cramped quarters. Some of those who prefer less space prefer to spend their money on other things like restaurants and travel, and others just like patting themselves on the back 24/7 for "living small." If you don't understand that, that's your problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What babble. Those that like smaller houses like them today and may like them tomorrow. Same goes for larger homes. The preference for less space is generally a niche preference held by those who prefer to engage in other forms of conspicuous consumption and/or what has been aptly described as conspicuous compassion.
Wow, you really had to contort yourself there, didn't you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What babble. Those that like smaller houses like them today and may like them tomorrow. Same goes for larger homes. The preference for less space is generally a niche preference held by those who prefer to engage in other forms of conspicuous consumption and/or what has been aptly described as conspicuous compassion.
Wow, you really had to contort yourself there, didn't you.
Anonymous wrote:
All those things could be achieved by upzoning to allow new townhouses. More tax revenues, younger families, greater demand to support retail. Plus you would have more density that could support transit more kids within walking distance, and more housing closer in for middle class people.
Anonymous wrote:What babble. Those that like smaller houses like them today and may like them tomorrow. Same goes for larger homes. The preference for less space is generally a niche preference held by those who prefer to engage in other forms of conspicuous consumption and/or what has been aptly described as conspicuous compassion.