Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, what the girls did was criminal. They produced child porn and then they showed it to a minor.

And all the receiver needed to do was hit "delete." No one forced anyone to open a website, compile and label pictures, and send out links so others could view the pictures. Many more counts of possible criminal activity for the ones involved in the creating and organizing of the website.

No. Actually "deleting" is called destroying criminal evidence - the crime being creation (by girls) and distribution of (by girls) child porn.

So. Is your contention that the boys were somehow forced to collect pictures, create a website, post and organize pictures, and then send out links to the site to others? They were innocent victims of the senders of these pictures?
If not, you must see greater degree of apparent intent to harm on the part of those whose names are connected to the account.

No. I think the boys should have told their parents, their parents should have notified the police and the girls should have been convicted of providing porn to a minor.

So... since they did not notify authorities. Both the boys and girls should be TREATED THE SAME. Imagine that, girls and boys are equal. Stop making girls the victim it is not good for anybody.

I do not think sharing the pictures with a friend is a bigger deal than getting naked and taking a picture then sending it to friends.

It is not the same. Creating and circulating a website takes many more steps and adds several issues of culpability.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, what the girls did was criminal. They produced child porn and then they showed it to a minor.

And all the receiver needed to do was hit "delete." No one forced anyone to open a website, compile and label pictures, and send out links so others could view the pictures. Many more counts of possible criminal activity for the ones involved in the creating and organizing of the website.

No. Actually "deleting" is called destroying criminal evidence - the crime being creation (by girls) and distribution of (by girls) child porn.

So. Is your contention that the boys were somehow forced to collect pictures, create a website, post and organize pictures, and then send out links to the site to others? They were innocent victims of the senders of these pictures?
If not, you must see greater degree of apparent intent to harm on the part of those whose names are connected to the account.

No. I think the boys should have told their parents, their parents should have notified the police and the girls should have been convicted of providing porn to a minor.

So... since they did not notify authorities. Both the boys and girls should be TREATED THE SAME. Imagine that, girls and boys are equal. Stop making girls the victim it is not good for anybody.

I do not think sharing the pictures with a friend is a bigger deal than getting naked and taking a picture then sending it to friends.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, what the girls did was criminal. They produced child porn and then they showed it to a minor.

And all the receiver needed to do was hit "delete." No one forced anyone to open a website, compile and label pictures, and send out links so others could view the pictures. Many more counts of possible criminal activity for the ones involved in the creating and organizing of the website.

No. Actually "deleting" is called destroying criminal evidence - the crime being creation (by girls) and distribution of (by girls) child porn.

So. Is your contention that the boys were somehow forced to collect pictures, create a website, post and organize pictures, and then send out links to the site to others? They were innocent victims of the senders of these pictures?
If not, you must see greater degree of apparent intent to harm on the part of those whose names are connected to the account.

No. I think the boys should have told their parents, their parents should have notified the police and the girls should have been convicted of providing porn to a minor.

So... since they did not notify authorities. Both the boys and girls should be TREATED THE SAME. Imagine that, girls and boys are equal. Stop making girls the victim it is not good for anybody.

I do not think sharing the pictures with a friend is a bigger deal than getting naked and taking a picture then sending it to friends.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm so curious what these posters are teaching their kids (if anything) about posting on social media. Or all you kids preschoolers? It's obvious that the parenting around here really needs to step up.

Girls post slutty pictures on instagram all the time. I tell my son not to like or comment on slutty or racist posts. I say no pictures of bodies unless the bodies are in public, like on the beach. I don't need to see your abs if you are in a bathroom or in your bedroom. If you are on the beach, you can take a picture of your six pack.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, what the girls did was criminal. They produced child porn and then they showed it to a minor.

And all the receiver needed to do was hit "delete." No one forced anyone to open a website, compile and label pictures, and send out links so others could view the pictures. Many more counts of possible criminal activity for the ones involved in the creating and organizing of the website.

No. Actually "deleting" is called destroying criminal evidence - the crime being creation (by girls) and distribution of (by girls) child porn.

So. Is your contention that the boys were somehow forced to collect pictures, create a website, post and organize pictures, and then send out links to the site to others? They were innocent victims of the senders of these pictures?
If not, you must see greater degree of apparent intent to harm on the part of those whose names are connected to the account.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So. Is your contention that the boys were somehow forced to collect pictures, create a website, post and organize pictures, and then send out links to the site to others? They were innocent victims of the senders of these pictures?
If not, you must see greater degree of apparent intent to harm on the part of those whose names are connected to the account.

Step away from the Law and Order reruns because you're sounding ridiculous now.
But what do you teach your kids about what they post on social media?

So you agree that the creation of the website involved many more counts of possible unscrupulous activity.

Objection! Assumes facts not in evidence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So. Is your contention that the boys were somehow forced to collect pictures, create a website, post and organize pictures, and then send out links to the site to others? They were innocent victims of the senders of these pictures?
If not, you must see greater degree of apparent intent to harm on the part of those whose names are connected to the account.

Step away from the Law and Order reruns because you're sounding ridiculous now.
But what do you teach your kids about what they post on social media?

So you agree that the creation of the website involved many more counts of possible unscrupulous activity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, the newspaper article indicated that not all of the pictures involved nudity. Are all the girl-blamers as outraged by a picture of a girl in a bathing suit by a pool? What if a picture like that were downloaded and ended up on a child porn site with the child's name attached as a result of being included on the dropbox account? Are you okay with that outcome?

Don't be ridiculous. Let's just stick to the facts we already (don't) have.

Actually, read the news report. Here's the exact words used in the article:

A 16-year-old male sophomore at McLean High School posted more than 50 explicit photos of female students online, including some of girls who were nude, according to search warrants filed in Fairfax County Circuit Court.

Bolding added for emphasis.

Anonymous wrote:These kids will learn a lesson many of their parents don't learn.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So. Is your contention that the boys were somehow forced to collect pictures, create a website, post and organize pictures, and then send out links to the site to others? They were innocent victims of the senders of these pictures?
If not, you must see greater degree of apparent intent to harm on the part of those whose names are connected to the account.

Step away from the Law and Order reruns because you're sounding ridiculous now.
But what do you teach your kids about what they post on social media?

Anonymous wrote:So. Is your contention that the boys were somehow forced to collect pictures, create a website, post and organize pictures, and then send out links to the site to others? They were innocent victims of the senders of these pictures?
If not, you must see greater degree of apparent intent to harm on the part of those whose names are connected to the account.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, the newspaper article indicated that not all of the pictures involved nudity. Are all the girl-blamers as outraged by a picture of a girl in a bathing suit by a pool? What if a picture like that were downloaded and ended up on a child porn site with the child's name attached as a result of being included on the dropbox account? Are you okay with that outcome?

Don't be ridiculous. Let's just stick to the facts we already (don't) have.

A 16-year-old male sophomore at McLean High School posted more than 50 explicit photos of female students online, including some of girls who were nude, according to search warrants filed in Fairfax County Circuit Court.

Anonymous wrote:Ok, so the girls can send pics of themselves "posing naked" (according to WaPo) but the recipients should have just "hit delete."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Actually, what the girls did was criminal. They produced child porn and then they showed it to a minor.

And all the receiver needed to do was hit "delete." No one forced anyone to open a website, compile and label pictures, and send out links so others could view the pictures. Many more counts of possible criminal activity for the ones involved in the creating and organizing of the website.

No. Actually "deleting" is called destroying criminal evidence - the crime being creation (by girls) and distribution of (by girls) child porn.