Anonymous wrote:Watching the news this morning and they mentioned Relisha's 20th birthday. I think about her often.
There is a new series about her case, hoping to get more answers:
https://www.blackandmissinginc.com/new-youtube-documentary-seeks-to-produce-breakthrough-in-relisha-rudd-case/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My heart leapt with a twinge of hope when I saw this topic, hoping there was new news, maybe even the almost impossible to imagine news of her being found alive. Good to know that some are still looking for her, or at least for answers. Her mom and mom's BF should absolutely be in jail for selling that little girl.
Me too. I think of Relisha from time to time.
Anonymous wrote:My heart leapt with a twinge of hope when I saw this topic, hoping there was new news, maybe even the almost impossible to imagine news of her being found alive. Good to know that some are still looking for her, or at least for answers. Her mom and mom's BF should absolutely be in jail for selling that little girl.
Anonymous wrote:Watching the news this morning and they mentioned Relisha's 20th birthday. I think about her often.
There is a new series about her case, hoping to get more answers:
https://www.blackandmissinginc.com/new-youtube-documentary-seeks-to-produce-breakthrough-in-relisha-rudd-case/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree. She was just gone. Out if their lives with no contact but no concern about it either. This is family pathology and it's offensive to other similarly situated families who are homeless and destitute to blame anyone other than Relisha's family for getting her into this situation.
+1
Thank you for saying what has been nagging me about this but I’ve been unable to express! It’s as if the conclusion of this is all families in poverty can’t care for their children so the government needs to step in. It’s paternalistic, has racist undertones and is offensive. This woman was a bad mother but that’s not because she lives in a homeless shelter or had a rough childhood. There are many others in the same situation who would never hand their child over to a grown man! This is an individual issue.
Did you miss the part that Relisha’s mother and grandmother spent their life in foster care as well??!
Hello!?!?
But what does that mean for Relisha? No doubt her family has some sad stories but should the city step in and involve itself in the parenting of every individual who themselves had been a part of the foster system? You can recognize the tough circumstances this family has experienced for generations but does that mean they shouldn't been responsible for keeping track of their kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the problem with the podcast is that they want to identify how the system(s) failed Relisha, but they also think that it's wrong for social services to intervene too much in families or split them up. So they can't really articulate what the "system" should have done differently, since the only thing that would really have protected Relisha was to have way more extensive intervention in the family and/or take Shamika's kids away to protect them. So it all feels disingenuous.
This podcast had the potential to be a really good investigative piece but ultimately fell real flat. She danced around the issue of ever placing the responsibility on the mother. Instead, the podcast or place responsibility on everybody else.
Anonymous wrote:I think the problem with the podcast is that they want to identify how the system(s) failed Relisha, but they also think that it's wrong for social services to intervene too much in families or split them up. So they can't really articulate what the "system" should have done differently, since the only thing that would really have protected Relisha was to have way more extensive intervention in the family and/or take Shamika's kids away to protect them. So it all feels disingenuous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agree. She was just gone. Out if their lives with no contact but no concern about it either. This is family pathology and it's offensive to other similarly situated families who are homeless and destitute to blame anyone other than Relisha's family for getting her into this situation.
+1
Thank you for saying what has been nagging me about this but I’ve been unable to express! It’s as if the conclusion of this is all families in poverty can’t care for their children so the government needs to step in. It’s paternalistic, has racist undertones and is offensive. This woman was a bad mother but that’s not because she lives in a homeless shelter or had a rough childhood. There are many others in the same situation who would never hand their child over to a grown man! This is an individual issue.
Did you miss the part that Relisha’s mother and grandmother spent their life in foster care as well??!
Hello!?!?